Jim Hoeft's "Open Apology"

By: Lowell
Published On: 7/21/2007 10:11:58 PM

I'll tell you, I may not agree with Jim Hoeft on very much politically, but this is courageous.

As human beings go, I'm pretty fallible. I occasionally get caught up in the moment and do things I regret later. So, I'm sorry.

So, what am I sorry for?

For example, last year I wrote that I thought Jim Webb was using Harris Miller's Jewish heritage against him through a caricature and then was doing the same through the attacks on George Allen for his Jewish ancestry. I called the whole tawdry scene "jew-baiting". Probably not the best choice of words. And I am still being criticized for them.

It was stupid. I'm sorry.

I wrote those words on a Web site dedicated to George Allen's re-election: Allen's A-Team. On that site, some of my fellow contributors got a little carried away with their characterization of Jim Webb early in the process. I never wrote on the site again. But I never publicly criticized the process, at least that I can recall. So, I will forever be labeled as being complicit to those activities.

I was not active in condemning the posts. I'm sorry.

There's a lot more, including some commentary on the Blogs United conference controversy involving Eileeen Levandoski of VB Dems, as well as another controversy involving a story Jim wrote on Phil Kellam.  This is truly an extraordinary post, no doubt about it, and I commend Jim for writing it.

[UPDATE: I was thinking more about what Jim wrote, and it's obvious that some of the "apologies" are sarcastic non-apologies, like "For choosing principle, this time, over partisanship, I?m sorry" and "For listening to both sides of an argument and reporting facts, I?m sorry."  I've got to say, the mixture of real apologies and sarcastic non-apologies in a single post makes it a bit difficult to know for sure what's going on.  I hope Jim clarifies.]


Comments



Better late (Teddy - 7/22/2007 12:05:01 AM)
than not at all, and it shows backbone and character--- why now? It puts up a standard of conduct we should all honor, whatever our political leanings. My regards.


It Really Was Remarkable. (Hermione - 7/22/2007 6:59:09 AM)
It would have been even more remarkable if he had not immediately allowed his sidekick, Squeaky Wheel, to take the apology back once it was publicly accepted.  This good cop, bad cop routine is very, very old, and discredits Hoeft's repeated claims of higher moral authority more quickly, thoroughly, and persuasively than anybody in the opposition could with their words.  Dump the Squeaky Wheel, Jim, and you will have nothing at all for which to apologize.


Yeah, that IS a weird pairing. (Lowell - 7/22/2007 7:36:52 AM)
Dr. Jekyll and Mr Hyde have nothing on these guys!  Ha.


Squeaky moved to Ohio (elevandoski - 7/22/2007 8:26:46 AM)
so he doesn't post as often.  Thank god!


A Lot More Courage and Integrity Than Most Realize (AnonymousIsAWoman - 7/22/2007 11:52:54 AM)
I don't agree with much that Jim writes politically either, which is why he once offered me the chance to do guest posts on his blog.  He wanted to have a wide variety of opinion on his site. It's why his friend Ragnar and Sean Holihan also post there.

So even though I had quit blogging, he asked me to do some occasional posts.  By doing that he became one of the people who enticed me back to the blogosphere.  So did Lowell and Ben Tribett. 

It's probably why I still am loyal to Jim as well as to Ben and Lowell and why it was so wrenching for me when things erupted across the blogosphere recently.  I like, admire, and respect all of them.

Jim is human, he's fallible. He makes mistakes and has failings like all of us.  But that piece blew me away.  And I'm proud of Lowell for picking it up too.  Great catch.

And by the way, you might actually agree with Jim more than you think.  He sometimes surprises.



And furthermore ... (AnonymousIsAWoman - 7/22/2007 11:56:30 AM)
I am so glad that he and Eileen have made up.  I was really, really sad that Eileen did feel excluded from the recent bloggers conference.  As I said before, she is too valuable to the blogosphere also to not be part of conferences and events.


Eileen and Jim both have a great deal to offer (Lowell - 7/22/2007 12:01:00 PM)
I hope that they will reach some sort of truce, if they haven't already.