Can anyone rescue Boucher from King Coal or us from Boucher?

By: Macduff
Published On: 6/19/2007 11:00:56 PM

Can anyone in Virginia rescue Rick Boucher from his addiction to the coal industry--or, alternatively, rescue us from Rick Boucher?  I recognize that he's from western Virginia, but is he really so wedded to the coal industry and its contributions that seriously addressing looming global warming catastrophies rates behind promoting coal industry profits? 

Not only has Boucher been pushing coal-to-liquids subsidies and measures to block states' rights to be more aggressive than the lazy Federal government on climate change, but Energy & Environment Daily (June 13, 2007)reports that, Boucher has been hanging out and travelling with Jim Connaughton (Council on Environmental Quality), the Bush Administration's chief appologist for doing nothing substantive on global warming.  Boucher says that, in addition to Connaughton, "I've been in a dialogue with the others in the White House over this."  Boucher's position on climate change is reportedly close to that of the White House and he expects them to support what he pushes in Congress.

Now if that doesn't scare you, I don't know what would.  We know that Bush wants no mandatory commitments to combat climate change, and, above all, Bush is wedded to traditional energy industries--oil and coal.  At most Bush wants to create an illusion of action, while actually doing nothing but delaying action by the U.S. and the international community.  Jim Connaughton, CEQ, says Bush seeks an international agreement only on "aspirational goals"--i.e., all talk, no action. 

If that's what Boucher wants then Virginia voters need to put pressure on him to move well beyond that head-in-the-sand approach.  Mandates for clean energy, efficiency and carbon pricing (carbon fees or, second best, a cap with auctioned-rights-and-trade)are desperately needed. 

If Virginians can't move Rick Boucher in the right direction, then the House leadership should shift responsibility from Boucher to a leader who will write aggressive climate legislation that the Nation needs.


Comments



Boucher is reacting out of genuine fear (Todd Smyth - 6/20/2007 4:04:21 PM)
Boucher is reacting out of genuine fear for the survival of the people in his district.  Evidenced by his recent obsession with introducing hair sheep as the next big agricultural product in SWVA.  The south side is going through a severe depression with textile factories shut down and 350 years of tobacco farming near gone.  People are dying there without access to health care. The conditions are far worse than most people up here are willing to admit or comprehend.

We import 700,000 gallons of ethanol per day from the mid-west used (10%) at every gas pump in NoVA, Richmond and Hampton Roads.  Some or all of that could be grown and produced in Virginia to re-vitalize rural Virginia and stop the desperation of coal to liquid fuel, which would turn our hybrids into Hummers.



Yes, get rid of coal, but what next? (TheGreenMiles - 6/22/2007 9:46:40 AM)
Good points, Todd.  If you're going to take away coal, you need to make sure you're replacing that element of the economy with something else.  Treehuggers like me can tell you to get rid of coal, but figuring out how that impacts places like SWVA is a much harder question.


Coal and SW Virginia: a Tough Issue (aprilac - 6/23/2007 10:36:15 PM)
http://hillbillysava...