Tysons Tunnel: Time for Action, Not Words

By: charlie hall
Published On: 6/4/2007 8:42:13 AM

Today, TysonsTunnel.org is busing over supporters to attend a Board of Supervisors session on the Tysons-Dulles rail project. But those supporters will not be allowed to speak. Instead, they will be silent witnesses as the board finally shows whether it really supports the Tysons Tunnel, or is just paying lip service.

Unfortunately, we already have a strong clue. On May 4, TysonsTunnel.org asked all 10 supervisors to hold a public hearing today, so that citizens can speak their minds before the board votes to commit our money to an elevated train through Tysons that almost nobody wants.

As of Sunday night, according to TysonsTunnel.org director Scott Monett, the board still hadn't responded to the organization's request. As Scott acknowledged in last night's RK blog radio talk show, Fairfax supervisors appear to be drifting toward a hugely unpopular, disastrous decision to fund the elevated train.

We all know the saying: Actions speak louder than words.
The board, especially Chairman Gerry Connolly and Providence Supervisor Linda Smyth, want it both ways. They want the warm fuzzy feeling of saying they prefer a tunnel, but their actions show a different agenda altogether.

RaisingKaine.com has done a wonderful job in recent weeks of pulling together the whole picture. Gov. Kaine said recently that the Fairfax board has not asked him to consider a tunnel. And Gerry Connolly has falsely said his only two choices are an elevated train or nothing at all. And of course Linda Smyth, as is her history on the big issues, has had little to say at all about what action the board should take.

When your choices are bad, you need to try to create some better choices. If the board really supports a tunnel, they'll do things that TysonsTunnel.org has requested.

1) They'll allow a public hearing without further delay.
2) On June 18, they will insist on full competitive bidding, as a condition of releasing Fairfax County funds for the rail project.
3) And they will also insist that a tunnel project will be considered before signing off on Fairfax's share of the funding.

Fairfax's funding is vital to the success of any rail project. Gov. Kaine can't move ahead without it. Scott Monett agreed on last night's show that the board would have enormous influence if they used their funding as leverage to fight for what almost all Fairfax citizens want: a tunnel, not an el.

This Board of Supervisors has made a habit of claiming its hands are tied as a reason not to do what is needed and right. But that tired game won't work here. If they passively sign a blank check for an elevated train, instead of fighting now when they can, voters will not forgive them.

Starting today, we need actions, not just words.

Charlie Hall,
Candidate, Providence District supervisor in the upcoming June 12 primary


Comments



Fairax Board: Not sincere in support of the tunnel (BettyLou - 6/4/2007 10:12:32 AM)
Linda Smyth, the consummate cog in a political machine, is facing a serious challenge from grassroots candidate Charlie Hall for Providence District Supervisor. Since Connolly "needs her" (his words) to insure that his desires are carried out in Providence, the political theater posed by this situation is intriguing.

Charlie's got it right. The Connolly/Smyth machine wants it both ways. They want to pay lip service to the overwhelming popular support for a tunnel, yet continue behind the scenes (and probably in their secret, closed door Board of Supervisor meetings) to facilitate the EL.

Smyth and Connolly don't want to upset some of their biggest campaign contributors who want something, anything to justify the high density development in Tysons that will enrich them. Also, what strings is the influential Bechtel Corp, builder of the EL, pulling behind the scenes?

So even if the Board declares today that there will be a public hearing on the issue, it is unlikely that hearing would have any effect on the Board's actions. Such a declaration would give Smyth the political cover to say "See, we're listening to the citizens". The hearing would be conducted after the June 12 Providence Supervisor primary and the Board could then do whatever they want (read that support the EL).



Any other major corporations interested? (Teddy - 6/4/2007 1:24:18 PM)
There may have been no competitive bidding, but has Tysons Tunnel project come up with any offers from another major construction firm, an offer to build the tunnel for less?  Or, even to build an elevated for less? Or is there genteel price-fixing by the Big Boys in the field? The only way I can see to get the Feds or The Supervisors to listen is to get another global-sized republican campaign contributor to make a better bid.


There is a competitive bid (Alice Marshall - 6/4/2007 2:47:00 PM)
The bid for the tunnel would cost LESS. Hans Mast has all the details on his blog.

The problem is too many Democrats think that it is a done deal and that vetoing the aerial plan would jepradize the entire project.

Tom Davis has set this up and is trying to persuade Democrats to take the blame for his behind the scenes manuvering.

They need to do the right thing, insist on a tunnel.



Wow! (Lowell - 6/4/2007 3:09:12 PM)
For the first time in probably 1 1/2 years, I agree with Alice Marshall on something! :)


Me too... (Doug in Mount Vernon - 6/5/2007 1:15:34 PM)
See, we do have unity sometimes!  :-)


Alice, what's your (Eric - 6/4/2007 3:12:56 PM)
guess on how the Fx Board of Supervisors will vote? 

I gather from your previous comments that you support Connolly and Smyth and it's widely anticipated that they will approve the aerial option.  And given your position on the tunnel (which I agree with), where does that leave you with supporting the current BOS?



I believe they will support a tunnel (Alice Marshall - 6/4/2007 3:26:13 PM)
The Tysons Tunnel coalition has done their work and very likey have rescued us from a very bad decision. But it never should have come this close.


I believe they will support a tunnel (voter4change - 6/5/2007 12:16:31 AM)
Alice, Alice, Alice.

Did you come to the BOS today and hear the staff briefing and BOS questions? 

Ain't no way this BOS is going to vote for the tunnel? If you believe this, could I have what you are smoking.

Gerry Connolly almost choked on his words while talking about the need to have a public hearing where citizens would get to speak. He said that he had heard enough.

Kauffman was great...maybe this was already fixed and everyone was in his/her position to act out the part where they thought they could pull the wool over our eyes. 

Like other hearings, this was a done deal.  Just like on June 18....Done Deal. This BOS will vote for the elevated. 

The time for change is now!  Start by voting for Charlie and put him in the Providence District Supervisor's office.



Alice, glad to hear (Eric - 6/5/2007 9:10:54 AM)
that you are so optimistic.  Sadly, I can't share your optimism - I think after talking the good talk the BOS is going to vote in the aerial option because "we need rail and we'll lose the $900M if we don't do this now - although we'd still prefer the tunnel". 

So my next question to you is: if the BOS does stab you in the back and vote for the aerial, are we going to see a scathing post on GOTV ripping the BOS a new one?



What ARE you smoking? (Lowell - 6/5/2007 10:00:36 AM)
Were you at the meeting yesterday?  Do you have any clue what you're talking about?  Let me spell it out for you nice and slow-like:

The.
Fix.
Is.
In.

Got it? 



Leadership (HerbE - 6/4/2007 2:04:48 PM)
Charlie has shown great leadership in pressuring the Board to open this rail decision (under not over) to a public hearing and to competitive bidding. But, perhaps, the current Board doesn't think that we (the general public) have the capability to understand the issue - or maybe they have more facts than the public so we are unqualified to make such a decision.

Oh, I forgot, they do have more facts! They held secret meetings to discuss policy information with MWAA and the Dept of Rail and Public Transportation. They would seem to think that it's important to not give the public too many facts...we might get confused.



Charlie Leads WITH Citizens! (Deborah Reyher - 6/4/2007 7:06:35 PM)
Indeed, Charlie publicly called for public input in the form of a series of Town Halls on April 30th.  Tysons Tunnel echoed that on May 4th and May 10th with letters seeking a single public hearing, which should be a MINIMUM standard for a project of this magitude.

That the Board would ignore such a call from the challenger to Connolly's favored Linda Smyth is predictable, and fully in keeping with the pleas of ordinary citizens over the years, whose requests repeatedly fall on deaf ears.

But to ignore TysonsTunnel.org as well, with its 20,000 energized supporters?

Like I said earlier, we have an established culture on the Board of "hearing no citizens". We need to stop it, and the way to start is to vote for Charlie Hall on June 12th.