Democratic Issues

By: Gustavus
Published On: 5/2/2007 3:10:34 PM

One of the most remarkable accomplishments of the Republicans during their rule of this country was making the Democrats scarred of what should have been their core issues.  The Republicans, with help from the MSM, convinced the Democrats that they lost numerous elections because they advocated a (very mild form of) gun control.  They are still afraid to speak out on this issue.  Similarly the Republicans (again with their MSM friends) convinced the Democrats that being for a sane use of military forces cost them one or two presidential elections.  Only now are the Democrats beginning to take a few tentative steps towards a rational policy in this area.

Another issue where the Democrats have been afraid to speak out, and perhaps the most important one, is tax policy.  In their hearts I think the Democrats know that almost everything the Republicans say about taxes (e.g., the Lafler curve) is absurd but they remain covinced that if they even mention "tax increases" they will lose every election in sight.

A perfect example of how this fear is hurting the country can be found in a recent article in the New York Times. The Food and Drug Administration inspectors sampled less than 21,000 of the 8.9 million food containers that arrived in this country.  Shipments from China, which were responsible for the recent contaminated pet food scare, totaled "199,000, of which less than 2 percent were sampled."  Why are so few inspected?  According to the Times it is because "the agency's budget has not kept pace with inflation."  The only way to have a safe food supply is by having more inspectors, but this would require more money, and more taxes-and that, the Republicans have convinced the Democrats, is a losing issue.

It is certainly a losing issue for you and I, who have to eat uninspected food. 


Comments



Just about every day we're reading about program cuts (Dianne - 5/3/2007 10:52:51 AM)
The NYT article states that the number of food inspectors is actually down from 2002 levels (post 9/11 they were increased).  One could then surmise that Bush's insertion of an unnecessary and unspeakable war and its staggering costs had something to with this cut in the FDA budget.  Look at Walter Reid, Medicaid, Medicare, education, etc.  Just do a google on "programs Bush has cut". 

I think the NYT's mention of inflation was merely as a comparison to what would be a minimum expected increase in services.