Poll: Virginia's Senators Now Even

By: Chris Guy
Published On: 3/28/2007 10:12:11 PM

A few months ago, just after Sen. Webb took office, Survey USA gave Sen. John Warner a 62-29 approval/disapproval rating, with Webb coming in at a depressing 42-47. I was quick to point out that Hillary Clinton had an approval rating of 38% in Jan. of 2001 when she first took office, and six years later they were nearly double that. But, nevertheless, those numbers for Webb were a tad humbling.

But the newest SurveyUSA numbers have Warner waaaay down to 51-37, with Webb up to a statistically even 49-38. Also, Gov. Kaine beats either of them, with a solid 53-38. Hopefully these numbers will help prove that John is not unbeatable next year, if he chooses to run again. Are you listening Mark? :)

 


Comments



Warner's not going anywhere... (Greg Hoss - 3/28/2007 10:56:32 PM)
Warner has far more popularity on both sides of the isle than Allen did. Even with his pro war stance, Warner seems like he's about even with Webb, who is anti war and on the side of public opinion.


Webb has quickly become a "popular figure" (DanG - 3/28/2007 11:19:27 PM)
He has a +11 Approval Rating.  Again, Warner is at +14, so he's not exactly unpopular.  Kaine is only at +15.  But the thing is that, right now, all Virginia politicians are relatively popular.  Webb could probably stand to get up over 50% by 2012, but he's doing just fine now.

Even though Warner is relatively popular, if Mark runs, John may go down Chaffee-style (relatively popular, but a casualty of the War).

P.S. - I make the movement that we now create the phrase "Going down Chaffee-style" to represent a popular politician going down because of an unpopular party.



Webb's rising ratings (libra - 3/28/2007 11:50:11 PM)
aren't at all surprising. He has, very quickly, become Dem netroots' favourite, for example, even though there had been doubts at first. But how can you object to a guy who's got a pair? Especially as you're wishing that a lot of other Dems in Congress would grow one too? On top of which he's clever, he's wily, he says precisely what he means to say (watching some other congresscritters on C-Span can be really embarassing), he knows his way around and he votes as we'd hoped he would. Compare that to the dashed hopes of Connecticut Dems (and the ecstasy of the Conn. Repubs)...

Nor are Warner's (slowly) sinking ratings all that surprising, either. Warner has become another Specter or McCain -- says one thing  but votes a different way. He may be more moderate and not as disgusting as Allen had been but, when all's said and done, he's still a Repub, with Repub loyalties. I most sincerely hope we can replace him with something better, come '08 (I agreee that replacing Warner,J with Warner,M would be wonderful and should be relatively easy to achieve, too)

BTW. Here's a collection (on YouTube) of 10 best political videos of recent years. Even there, Webb wins... #1 is the famous Macaca one which knocked Allen for a loop :)



Another McCain (Hugo Estrada - 3/29/2007 9:55:56 AM)
Libra,

You nailed this. Warner is quickly becoming another McCain. He says one thing, but he votes differently.

I know that the Republican Party discipline has served them well for many years, but this is becoming a major liability for them.

When Republican representatives or senators have to choose between their voters and conscience or their party, they tend to favor their party. Sometimes they do this even if it hurts them politically.

It is so absurd that most Republicans will still follow party lines to protect Bush, even though he is a lame duck that is destroying their party.



ooops... (libra - 3/28/2007 11:51:03 PM)
This is the URL for the 10 political videos:
http://tinyurl.com/3...


ISG Betrayal (Josh - 3/29/2007 12:29:25 AM)
Warner pretended to support a rational foreign policy with the ISG, but when push came to shove, he just stuck with Bush.  It happened at the last minute and it was a slap in the face.  Pure politics bereft of principle.