Quick Update on Anti-Gay Legislation in Nigeria

By: PM
Published On: 3/25/2007 5:16:28 PM

The Episcopal Diocese of Washington blog, Daily Episcopalian, says that the Nigerian legislature adjourned without acting on the controversial anti-gay legislation that would have created severe criminal penalties even for gay advocacy in the country.  The legislature does not reconvene until May, after the general election, and then only for one week.

[P]eople who have been monitoring the situation for various human rights organizations have suggested that the election may alter political dynamics enough to make passage of the bill in its current form less likely.

http://blog.edow.org...


Comments



Episcopal Bishops Stand Firm for Tolerance Dispite Untimatum from Anglicans (connie - 3/26/2007 11:06:00 AM)
Meanwhile, the Episcopal House of Bishops stood firm this week as viewing the Gospel as teaching that "all God's children, including gay and lesbian persons, are full and equal participants" in the church. Here's the AP Story:
http://www.chieftain....  By taking this position, the Episcopal Church of the United States risks being separated from the more conservative "Anglican Communion" with which the Bishop of Nigeria (and those churches in Northern Va. who left the Episcopal Church) have alligned themselves. 


Good for the Episcopal Church of the US!!!! (Dianne - 3/26/2007 12:45:30 PM)
It so good to read that the Episcopalians are practicing Christianity.  I'm saddened that the Archbishop and the Church of England are so anachronistic in their thinking, so intolerant in their humanity, and I'm sure the sadness on the part of the Archbishop as to the American wing is related to the following (from the article you've cited):

The small yet affluent Episcopal Church, with 2.3 million members, covers a significant chunk of the Anglican Communion's budget.

To the parishoners of Truro Church in Falls Church who have aligned themselves with this type of despicable intolerance, go find another place to worship if you believe so hardily that homosexuals are evil!  Or is it a matter of money too? 



Here are some anti-gay quotes that will shock you (PM - 3/26/2007 1:52:12 PM)
from one of the main monetary supporters of the anti-gay Episcopalians, Howard F. Ahmanson Jr.

Ahmanson was a disciple of the Rev. Rousas John Rushdoony, the father of Christian Reconstructionism. Rushdoony died in 2001 with the Ahmansons at his bedside. He advocated basing the American legal system on biblical laws, including stoning adulterers and homosexuals.

Ahmanson [said in 2004]: "I think what upsets people is that Rushdoony seemed to think--and I'm not sure about this--that a godly society would stone people for the same thing that people in ancient Israel were stoned," Ahmanson was quoted as saying. "I no longer consider that essential."

"It would still be a little hard to say that if one stumbled on a country that was doing that, that it is inherently immoral, to stone people for these things," he added. "But I don't think it's at all a necessity."

http://www.edow.org/...

I urge people to read the entire two part article from which this excerpt comes.  The writer, an official of the Washington Diocese, seems to have carefully traced the attempted hijacking of mainstream American Episcopals on behalf of GOP theocrats.

The anti-gay crowd wants to be governed by Peter Akinola of Nigeria, who thinks this of gays:

http://www.churchtim...


We argue that it is a blatant lie against Almighty God that homosexuality is their God-given urge and inclination. For us, it is better seen as an acquired aberration.

Protagonists of homosexuality try to elevate this aberration, unknown even in animal relationships, beyond divine scrutiny, while church leaders, who are called to proclaim the undiluted word of God like the prophets of old, are unashamedly looking the other way.

It is rare to find such a combination of bigotry and ignorance in one person -- but he's the right wing Episcopal's champion.

However, from what I've read, it looks like the mainstream Episcopals intend to hang together.  There are some observers who think the Archbishop of Centerbury, by allowing himself to be rolled by Akinola, may find himself out of a job:http://www.telegraph...

 

The text of the American bishops' statement is damaging. This is a national Church speaking with an (almost) united voice. The casus belli has shifted from the ordination of Gene Robinson, a bishop who is in a relationship with another man, to allegations of bullying by a group of primates led by the Archbishop of Canterbury.

Dr Williams now finds himself out of favour with liberals and moderate conservatives in his own Communion. And, harsh though it may sound, he has only himself to blame.

In the past couple of years, he has allowed conservative Anglicanism to be hijacked by extremists.

Again, I don't want to talk about the internals of Episcopal church politics, but sometimes it is intertwined with the human rights issue.

If anyone is interested in what the individual bishops have to say about these issues, someone is collecting links here:  http://telling-beads...



He's a Presbyterian. (loboforestal - 3/26/2007 2:33:41 PM)
So what?  Lot's of outsiders got wacky ideas.


Episcopal Bishops' Refusal to Succumb to Anglican Ultimatum (connie - 3/26/2007 1:57:47 PM)
The Anglican Church in Great Britain is just limping along.  Church attendance is abysmal.  I cannot help but think that this is due in part to the fact that the Anglican Church is just out of touch with the thinking and beliefs of most people in Britain, gay and straight alike, who cannot relate to a church obsessed with intolerance and hanging on to outdated viewpoints.  I'm no expert on "The Anglican Communion" but a friend of mine went to a seminar about it, and it all began in the last century as somewhat of a "let's all sit down and have tea together" kind of organization.  The Anglican Church doesn't "own" our churches, nor do they have the legal right to tell the Episcopal Church what to do.  While a "communion" is a nice thing to have, it's not something the U.S. Church needs.  The Episcopal church, while relatively small in number in the whole "Communion" is a HUGE force in the group financially. 
The Episcopal Church, like the U.S. of A. was founded in reaction to our not wanting to be controlled by or dictated to by the king or the Archbiship of Canterbury.  Guess it's hard for them to accept that we aren't colonials any more!


That's what I've heard about the Anglican church there too (PM - 3/26/2007 2:32:45 PM)
Church attendance is down in most of Europe.  For example, I just read about the Church of Sweden (Lutheran) telling the Swedish government that if it made gay marriage legal (civil unions are what exist there now) the church would adopt a gay marriage ceremony.  Most Swedes consider themselves belonging to the Church nominally -- but attendance is only about 5%.

It's interesting that Europe is losing organized religion.  I guess they looked hard at themselves after WWII and found it to be a divisive force?  I don't know.  But Spain has gay marriage.  And Mexico City just approved civil unions.  And those traditionally were strongholds of Catholicism.

I wonder if the American Episcopal church will get even closer to the ELCA Lutheran church here -- they already have a "communion" agreement.  According to Wikipedia: "The [ELCA] Church maintains full communion relationships with member churches of the Lutheran World Federation (which is a communion of 140 autonomous national/regional Lutheran church bodies in 78 countries around the world, representing nearly 66 million Christians), the Episcopal Church, the Moravian Church in America, the Presbyterian Church (USA), the Reformed Church in America, and the United Church of Christ."

Seems like those churches should pool resources and have an international alliance.

The Lutherans seem a little bit behind the Episcopals on gay issues, but they seem willing to tolerate the differences, and officially welcome homosexuals.  Apparently some blessings of gay unions are taking place. http://en.wikipedia....
And they're good on women's issues generally speaking.

According to my wife, an ex-Lutheran -- the Lutherans have the best church singing of all the denominations.  She said it is common to go into a church and hear the entire congregation singing the different voice parts during hymn singing.



Episcopalians and Lutherans (connie - 3/26/2007 3:09:08 PM)
PM, until you mentioned your wife I had presumed you were a woman since you spoke out so much about injustice and intolerance. Guess I shouldn't have been so biased toward my own gender.  My husband grew up in the United Church of Christ, a progressive, mostly northern religion which has been at the forefront of gay inclusivity in the Protestant world.  My husband belongs to the Episcopal church because I'm Episcopalian, and I think this whole debate has made him have more respect for the Episcopal Church and church leaders even though at the parish level most priests don't take a public stand  for fear of offending at least some of the congregation.  Suffice it to say, by staying in the church, we are all taking a stand that it's about time for the church to stop excluding gays from church leadership positions.

Another issue which someone needs to research, which I have only heard through the grapevine, is that supposedly there has been an attempt in past years to introduce legislation at the Virginia General Assembly which would somehow give greater statutory rights to churches that want to break off from governing church bodies and take church property with them.  The person who told me this didn't know all the details, so I'm not sure if this is accurate or not. Perhaps someone who's down at the General Assembly a lot might know what this is all about and if it is true.  I'd hate to think that persons within these dissenting church groups might use our legislature this way, so if you can find out anything about this I'd be interested.



I'll check around (PM - 3/26/2007 4:49:06 PM)
Thanks for the compliment, too.  I think one of the reasons my wife and I get along so well is that we don't think in terms of male-female roles. Our mutual parents did not either.

I'm not any minority.  But I've just seen too many people, close friends, hurt by prejudice.  Maybe the bigots don't know that even adults of a put-upon group suffer emotionally, as well as physically and financially.

I understand that one of the Va. breakaway churches reached a settlement recently with the diocese.  It seemed fair to me.  The current, breakaway group had bought land a few years ago to build upon.  They get to keep that.  They are renting the current building for 5 years at $1 a year plus upkeep of the building), at which time the diocese will take it over.

Akinola is said to be a buddy of the horrible bishop Kunonga in Zimbabwe, who works hand in hand with Mugabe.  I have a few interesting citations on the Zimbabwe bishop, but here's how he got his house:

He [Kunonga]was rewarded by Mugabe with St Marnock's, 2000 acres of prime farmland 15 kilometers outside Harare , confiscated from its previous white owner, 25-year-old Marcus Hale. The bishop installed his son in the seven-bedroom farmhouse, which overlooked a lake and sweeping fields of wheat and soya: the lake remains, but the house is now derelict and the crops have been replaced by weeds. The bishop, a short, thickset man who wears a jeweled cross over his cassock, also evicted 50 black workers and their families from the property.

Rowan Williams recently gave Kunonga a verbal wrist slap for being close to Mugabe.  But the allegations against Kunonga (from whites and blacks) suggest he's a first-class thug.  For example, Kunonga licensed the acting vice-president of Zimbabwe, Joseph Msika, a man on record as saying that whites are not human beings, to act as a deacon of the church. Akinola, for his part, had Kunonga speak at an African Conference.

Here are some citations to that can of worms:

http://blog.edow.org...

http://www.isn.ethz....

http://www.guardian.... contains this sum up:


Yet curiously, Akinola seems much more obsessed with what gay white men get up to than with some of the abuses in Africa. He has uttered not a word of condemnation of Bishop Nolbert Kunonga of Harare, a crony of the Mugabe regime, who has been accused by his own black parishioners of seizing white property, evicting black farm workers, and calling for the assasination of his church opponents. Indeed, Akinola invited Kunonga to address a plenary session of the All African Conference of Bishops.


New: The Archbishop of Canterbury on Gays Within the Church (PM - 3/28/2007 10:16:13 AM)
Rowan Williams, the current Archbishop of Canterbury, has just issued a statement on gays within the Church.  He seems to keep one foot in the majority American (pro-gay)position; but he does not condemn the anti-gay efforts in Nigeria.  In any event, it is a sensitive statement:http://www.archbisho...

Here's an excerpt:

" The commitments of the Communion are not only to certain theological positions on the question of sexual ethics but also to a manifest and credible respect for the proper liberties of homosexual people, a commitment again set out in successive Lambeth Conference Resolutions over many decades. I share the concerns expressed about situations where the Church is seen to be underwriting social or legal attitudes which threaten these proper liberties. It is impossible to read this report without being aware that in many places - including Western countries with supposedly `liberal' attitudes - hate crimes against homosexual people have increased in recent years and have taken horrifying and disturbing forms.

" No-one reading this report can be complacent about such a situation, and the Church is challenged to show that it is truly a safe place for people to be honest and where they may be confident that they will have their human dignity respected, whatever serious disagreements about ethics may remain. It is good to know that the pastoral care of homosexual people is affirmed clearly by so many provinces.