Environmental Fixes For Dominion Re-Regulation Bill

By: xcurmudgeon
Published On: 3/8/2007 12:40:31 PM

Governor Kaine has his plate full with the defective, but still fixable, transportation bill sitting on his desk.

That leaves little time for him to focus on an equally important bill dumped in his lap by the General Assembly, which would dramatically change the way electric utilities--particularly Dominion Virginia Power--are regulated in the Commonwealth.

Among other things, the bill is an environmental disaster.  Here, we explore some ideas for improving the bill on the environmental side.  However, the entire bill needs careful consideration--which it did not get this term.  The Governor should veto it so that he, the Attorney General and the General Assembly can more carefully consider these important issues next year.
Others have done an excellent job here on RK of detailing the way Dominion rammed this bill through the General Assembly this term without anyone really understanding what it will do to electric power consumers in the state.

Our focus is on the environmental side.  For all practical purposes, Dominion is the only electric utility in the state of Virginia.  We are fortunate that it is a well-managed company that has kept electricity rates relatively low.

Dominion, however, is behind on the environmental curve, and it won't even try to catch up unless the legislature, Public Service Commission, Governor and Attorney General force it to.

Dominion badly wants new legislation that will change the way it is regulated and allow it to raise the capital needed to meet Virginia's future power demands. That puts the state in an excellent bargaining position to obtain some key environmental concessions.

First, Dominion should be required to offer its Greenpower program--which is available in NC--to Virginia customers.  This program, similar to programs offered by other utilities around the country--allows a customer to pay a bit extra to obtain his or her power solely from renewable resources, such as wind energy.  These programs incentivize utilities like Dominion to expand their investments in renewable energy.

Second, Dominion should be required to expand its net metering program in Virginia by providing a set amount of financing for consumers who want to install their own renewable energy generation onsite.  This further encourages development of wind and solar energy in the state.  At present, there is a cap on the amount of net-metered energy that Dominion must accept, equal to 0.1% of its total energy demand in Virginia.  The cap should either be removed, or raised to at least 5%.  There is some other tinkering that can be done with the net metering provisions to further encourage individuals and businesses to develop their own alternative sources of renewable electricity.

Third, Dominion should be required to make aggressive investments in conservation.  There are ways to structure regulation that will give Dominion appropriate incentives to promote electricity conservation programs.  We should study successful programs from other states and implement them here.  Remember:  a 100 megawatt reduction in electric demand is just as good as building a new 100 megawatt powerplant.  There is plenty of room for Virginians to reduce their consumption without any impact on lifestyle. (I have detailed on my own blog how I reduced my power bill by as much as 30 percent in some months by taking simple steps that don't require any sacrifice.)

[One way to improve conservation is to raise rates.  We note that higher rates does not necessarily mean higher bills: if rates go up 25% but as a result you use 25% less energy, your total bill will stay the same.  Californians use, on average, almost half the electricity of Virginians.  Their electric rates are higher, but their total electric bills are not.]

Fourth, we need to explore incentives to discourage Dominion from building new coal-fired power plants in Virginia (or elsewhere for purposes of supplying Virginia).  With prospects high for the enactment of national legislation to discourage carbon emissions, it would be economic folly for Dominion to commit the state to new generation from coal.  In any event, it is environmentally irresponsible.  Virginia has a long and sensitive coastline that is vulnerable to rising sea levels and increased storm activity.  We can ill afford to endanger our historically significant and economically vital coastal communities through such short-sighted actions as building new coal electric plants.  If anything, we should be looking for ways to retire the existing ones.

With its good management and sound financial base, Dominion could, with the right incentives, become an environmental leader that would do Virginia proud.  Now is the time to make sure those incentives are put in place.

Governor Kaine should veto the bill hastily pushed through the General Assembly this term, followed by a commitment to work with Dominion, environmental groups and consumer advocates for a bill that suits all Virginians in the next term.


Comments



Virginia Conservation Network on the Dominion bill (Kindler - 3/10/2007 11:25:55 AM)
FYI, the Virginia Conservation Network reports the following:

Electricity "Re-regulation"  The final version of SB 1416 and HB3068 would still guarantee excessive corporate profits by forcing consumers to pay for polluting new power plants and invasive new infrastructure. The governor has indicated his willingness to amend the bill. VCN and our national partners have asked Gov. Kaine to place energy efficiency, peak-demand management and renewable generation on equal footing with new base-load generation.  Dollar for dollar, these are the most cost-effective solutions, but this lopsided legislation contains fuel- and construction-cost recovery provisions that distort the marketplace.

  I encourage you to call Gov. Kaine (804-786-2211) and ask him to protect our air and landscapes, combat global warming, and ensure Virginia 's long-term economic competitiveness by amending this bill.  Tell him you want to see a comprehensive, statewide approach to energy efficiency that includes a system benefit fund, decoupling, distributed generation, and a mandatory renewable portfolio standard.



Yes, we need more groups' input on this bill (Hugo Estrada - 3/10/2007 1:03:30 PM)
My guess is that Virginia Power understand that re-regulation is happening no matter what, so they want to ram through a bill that will be in their advantage. Understandable position, but wrong for our state.

Virginia Power's re-regulation bill should have been a draft. Every other energy stakeholder in Virginia should have had a chance to voice their opinion and offer modifications.

Since this didn't happen, there should be a veto to allow a fairer process.

It is absurd for a monopoly to dictate how it should be regulated. An energy monopoly should be mainly focused on serving the public good.