Colbert King on Frank Hargrove and the "Spirit of Jim Crow"

By: Lowell
Published On: 1/20/2007 7:42:25 AM

Check out Colbert King's op-ed, ,
"In Virginia, More to 'Get Over' Than Slavery"
, which takes on not just Frank Hargrove specifically, but also Virginia's racial history more broadly.  According to King, whose great grandparents were slaves, owned by "a white Culpeper County family that had the last name Colbert."  As Colbert notes, explaining why he's not going to "get over it" anytime soon, these people - his ancestors - were "listed by name, with individually assigned monetary value, among the inventory of farm implements, barnyard animals and other Colbert-owned assets."

OK, you argue, but that was a long time ago.  Why can't Colbert King "get over it" in the year 2006, when slavery is so far in the past?  Well, as Faulkner said, "The past is never dead. It's not even past."  In fact, Virginia's history of racial segregation and discrimination continued through much of the 20th century, definitely in Hargrove's lifetime.  For instance, King points out:

*"Hargrove was 17 when the Virginia legislature passed a law requiring separate white and black waiting rooms at airports. Surely he must have heard about that."

*"When Hargrove was 29, Sen. Harry Byrd declared massive resistance to the Supreme Court's 1954 Brown decision desegregating public schools. Did he miss that?"

*"What did 31-year-old Hargrove think in 1958 when the General Assembly passed a series of laws to prevent school desegregation, including a measure forbidding state funds to be spent on integrated schools?"

It's amazing that Hargrove, who lived through all of this, can so casually tell black people to "get over it."  Has he "gotten over" the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts, which some would say caused the Democratic Party to lose the once "Solid South" for 40 years now? 

And has Hargrove "gotten over" the fact that his ancestors were far more likely to have benefited from slavery than to have suffered from it?  In fact, as King points out, "contrary to what Frank Hargrove and others may wish to believe, the state's legacy of segregation and discrimination in education and employment has harmed many black Virginians, depriving them of the tangible benefits enjoyed by their white counterparts."  The point is, slavery isn't just a moral evil, it's also an economic system that greatly benefits some, while greatly harming many others. 

And it's not just slavery, King points out, it's also more insidious systems like the segregation and institutionalized discrimination known as "Jim Crow" that prevailed in Virginia for nearly 100 years after the Civil War ended.  King's concluding paragraph cuts to the core of this whole issue:

Which gets me to the source of his consternation: the legislative proposal for Virginia to issue an apology for slavery. I'm not sure it's worth the trouble. But if the effort must be made, why should the apology be limited to involuntary servitude? Why not include the sins of segregation and discrimination? Unlike slavery, those are sins that loads of Virginians, alive and well today, had something to do with.

Perhaps THAT is why the Frank Hargroves of the world want everyone to "get over" the past?  Because in their own lives, the past was not only not "dead," it wasn't even past?


Comments



Get Over Slavery? (Gordie - 1/20/2007 9:11:01 AM)
The discusting issue to get over is "Civil War" re-enactments. Every so often I drive past "Oak Ridge" estates and see confederate and union uniforms moving in and out of the woods. As slavery is a heavy burdon on our past, so is the Civil War. A war which was faught over the separation of the United States. Thank God we never became a North and South Korea or a North and South Vietnam.
Thank God for President Lincoln that he was smart enough to find a moral issue to fight over to prevent the dividing of this country. Moral issues such as slavery will always get ones blood boiling. Thank God for a president that was smart enough to stop 2 injustcies with 1 war.
So in reality as much as I hated slavery and the imprisonment of other humans for no reason other then laziness, cheap labor and power over other humans, I must thank and apologize for slavery of the past. But today I must still apologize for the "NEW" slavery being practised in certain areas of the United States.
What really has to be gotten over, is the Superiorty thinking of some people. 


President Lincoln (Ingrid - 1/20/2007 10:18:29 AM)
The Great Emancipator?  As a state legislator, and even after 1863, he believed strongly in the deportation of Blacks. He wasn't too crazy about Mexicans either. The Emancipation Proclamation, forced on him by abolitionists like Frederick Douglass and others, did nothing to abandon Lincoln's own belief in white supremacy and civil rights for Whites only.  In the end, we should thank Frederick Douglass and other abolitionists, who should be called the Great Emancipators.


Thank You (Gordie - 1/20/2007 3:01:10 PM)
for the history lesson,but if you read my posting I never said anything about Lincoln's feelings toward blacks. All I said was he used the slavery issue to get others to back him in the War to keep the Nation one Nation. It is quite evident after this statement at his inaugural:

Lincoln warned the South in his Inaugural Address: "In your hands, my dissatisfied fellow countrymen, and not in mine, is the momentous issue of civil war. The government will not assail you.... You have no oath registered in Heaven to destroy the government, while I shall have the most solemn one to preserve, protect and defend it."

Lincoln thought secession illegal, and was willing to use force to defend Federal law and the Union. When Confederate batteries fired on Fort Sumter and forced its surrender, he called on the states for 75,000 volunteers. Four more slave states joined the Confederacy but four remained within the Union. The Civil War had begun.

My statement "thereby solving 2 issues" may have confused you.



A pathetic letter to the Roanaoke Times (KathyinBlacksburg - 1/20/2007 11:22:38 AM)
I am personally ashamed that such Hargrove bigotry has reared its ugly head --again. 

Closer to home (mine) there's a pathetic letter to the editor today in the Roanoke Times

Said the letter writer:


I learned as a child that when someone digs up a dead dog, it stinks. Let's enjoy the history of Jamestown 2007 without an exhumation of any dead dogs.

Unbelievable!  I guess the letter writer subscribes to a sanitized version of our history, perhaps a Disney-like cartoon.  Revisionism strikes another blow. 

Without ensuring that our collective memory remembers, we (collectively speaking) are doomed to repeat old travesties. 



Above comment by me should have read: (KathyinBlacksburg - 1/20/2007 11:27:53 AM)
I messed up and left off the end blockquote above, thus including my comment (from "Unbelievable ....").  The comment should have read:

I am personally ashamed that such Hargrove bigotry has reared its ugly head --again.

Closer to home (mine) there's a pathetic letter to the editor today in the Roanoke Times

Said the letter writer:

Unbelievable!  I guess the letter writer subscribes to a sanitized version of our history, perhaps a Disney-like cartoon.  Revisionism strikes another blow.

Unbelievable!  I guess the letter writer subscribes to a sanitized version of our history, perhaps a Disney-like cartoon.  Revisionism strikes another blow.

Without ensuring that our collective memory remembers, we (collectively speaking) are doomed to repeat old travesties. 



Sorry... failed to preview (learned my lesson). (KathyinBlacksburg - 1/20/2007 1:33:55 PM)
Yikes!  Lowell, if you have the power ("of the powerful"), as I think you do, to delete a comment, please delete away at the last two comments I made here on this story.

I messed up, not once but TWICE, thus including my comment (from "Unbelievable ....")as if it were from the letter writer.  One last time:

My words: I am personally ashamed that such Hargrove bigotry has reared its ugly head --again.

Closer to home (mine) there's a pathetic letter to the editor today in the Roanoke Times

Said the letter writer to the Roanoke Times,
"I learned as a child that when someone digs up a dead dog, it stinks. Let's enjoy the history of Jamestown 2007 without an exhumation of any dead dogs."

My words again:
Unbelievable!  I guess the letter writer subscribes to a sanitized version of our history, perhaps a Disney-like cartoon.  Revisionism strikes another blow.

Without ensuring that our collective memory remembers, we (collectively speaking) are doomed to repeat old travesties.

 



deleting comment deletes subthread (teacherken - 1/20/2007 5:57:20 PM)
which would mean the corrective comment(s) appended thereto would also disappear.

I use to have that power when I was an administrator, no longer do.

Peace



Delegate Hargrove (JLK - 1/20/2007 11:42:17 AM)
Hargrove argued that "not a soul in this legislature" had anything to do with slavery.  This argument is seductive and needs to be refuted.  The fact is that we as a people belong to states, churches, companies, etc. that have existences spanning generations; and we identify with, and take pride in, those entities' past accomplishments.  Thus, on every 4th of July, we celebrate, the accomplishments of our American Revolution forefathers even though we as individuals had nothing to do
with their actions. 

If we are to show pride in the accomplishments of our forefathers, we must, by the same token, be willing to express shame for their past wrongs. It is this logic of intergenerational continuity that led to many recent apologies for past wrongs, such as the Holy See's 1998 apology for an earlier generation of Catholics' passivity in the face of the Nazis' genocidal treatment of Jews.  Such owning up to past wrongs is important for the moral health of a people, a fact of life that Mr. Hargrove is, sadly, oblivious to.



Great comment. (Lowell - 1/20/2007 1:35:39 PM)
Thanks!


Great comment! (KathyinBlacksburg - 1/20/2007 2:08:52 PM)
JLK, your comments about the melding of the good and the bad in our history is really important.  We can't carry with us only our accomplishments as a nation.  We must also carry on and try to right the wrongs of the past.  In fact that's what human life is about.  We continue to try to do better.  But how can we continue to do better if there comes a point where no one even recognizes our own history?


King gets it (Vivian J. Paige - 1/20/2007 1:44:16 PM)
and so do I. That's why I posted the copy of the purchase document on my great-great grandmother. That's what I meant in my post about looking at property records to find my ancestors.

Yes, slavery was a long time ago. But as Kaine said in his speech here in Norfolk on MLK Day (also on my blog), it's not just about slavery - it is about the systematic way in which Virginia denied basic rights to its black citizens after slavery was abolished.

People like Hargrove don't understand White Privilege and how, to this day, it affects out economic system.



King Gets It (Susan P. - 1/27/2007 9:19:13 PM)
Jesus didn't "get over it."  He observed Passover, commemorating the Jews' release from bondage.