ACTION ALERT: Don McEachin's fundraiser with Governor Kaine

By: phriendlyjaime
Published On: 12/7/2006 9:00:00 PM

Donald McEachinHere's the important info:
Governor Tim Kaine will attend a special reception for The Honorable A. Donald McEachin, member of the House of Delegates for the 74th District. The reception will be held at the Science Museum of Virginia on Tuesday, December 12, 2006 from 5:00-7:00 pm.

The Science Museum of Virginia is located at 2500 West Broad Street in Richmond, Virginia.

For more information, or to RSVP for this event, you can call Sonya Bowman at 804-288-3381 or e-mail Sonya at sbowman@mceachingee.com.

UPDATE:  If you can, try to help promote this issue on Daily Kos.  Thanks.

Now follow me below the fold for some juicy bits on why this is so important...
I don't know if any of you have wandered over to The Richmond Democrat lately, but JC Wilmore is doing a great job reporting on what looks like Benny Lambert's impending doom.  There is an in-depth report on The Richmond City Democratic Committee meeting held last night, and things do not sound good.  Unfortunately, I couldn't be there, but here are some highlights:

There were several issues to be discussed, but attention turned immediately to the issue of what to do about Benny Lambert. The committee's chairman, Jim Nachman, reported that he had sent a brief letter to Senator Lambert informing him that in openly supporting George Allen during the general election on November 7, 2006, Lambert had violated the rules of the Democratic Party of Virginia and the Richmond City Democratic Committee. Nachman asked that Lambert appear before the committee and explain his actions.

According to Nachman, Lambert replied that he was unable to appear at last night's meeting due to a prior commitment--a claim that was greeted with the roll of eyes and shrug of shoulders--but that he wanted to appear before the committee in January.

And THIS is rich...
  * Lambert claimed that he didn't understand that what he did violated the rules of the Democratic Party of Virginia and that he didn't realize that he might face discipline as a result.
  * Lambert claimed that his endorsement was the result of a "deal" he had cut with Allen to obtain funding for Historically Black Colleges and Universities ("HBCU"). Lambert complained that the General Assembly was all too ready to fund schools like UVA and Virginia Tech, but not HBCU.
  * Foreshadowing a possible legal argument that he may make, Lambert claimed that the Democratic Party of Virginia's rule against publicly opposing a Democratic candidate in a contested race is "unconstitutional."
  * Lambert also opined that the DPV should be thanking him for uniting the party (against Lambert and Allen).
WOW.  I'm a speechless, which is entirely out of character for me.

Additionally, we see that the Richmond Free Press (and yes; I picked up my free copy this morning on my mighty brisk walk to work) has picked up on the upcoming battle between the stellar and amazing Del. Don McEachin and "dead in the water, soon to be out of a job" Benji Lambert, and they have some GREAT quotes from Lambert himself:

"It's a free country. He can do what he wants," Sen. Lambert said Tuesday when he was informed of Delegate McEachin's plans. Such a contest, if it materializes, would be the first since Sen. Lambert won the 9th District Senate seat in 1986, when then-Sen. L. Douglas Wilder went on to be elected lieutenant governor.

"I am going to run for re-election, and I am going to run as a Democrat. I want to stay with the party," said the 69-year-old optometrist, who helps write the state budget as the second-ranking Democratic member of the Senate Finance Committee.

"It will be up to the people to decide," said the senator, who continues to defend his support for the defeated Sen. Allen by citing an unfulfilled Allen promise to gain millions of dollars in funding for histroically black colleges and universities.

Senator Lambert seems to be in complete denial: both about the moral ground he stands upon when he continues to defend his support of George Allen and in his assumption that he will be allowed to retain his membership within the Democratic Party.
Damns.  Seriously.  Not lookin' good for Mr. Lambert, huh?

Finally, because Mr. Lambert didn't show up to the meeting last evening, people felt free to speak their minds and get it all out in the air.  Here are some of the main points made by citizens and elected officials of the city of Richmond:

The excuse that Senator Lambert most often cites when justifying his support for George Allen--funding for HBCU's--is without merit. In six years in the U.S. Senate George Allen never delivered on his promise to obtain additional funding for HBCU's.

George Allen isn't any ordinary Republican: he once gloried in boasting that he would push Democrats' "soft teeth down their whiny throats." It's not like Benny Lambert endorsed a moderate centrist like Lincoln Chaffee: George Allen is the mortal enemy of Democrats everywhere.

This was not an "ordinary" election. The War in Iraq, the Supreme Court, and control of the Senate hinged on Webb's challenge to Allen. If Lambert's betrayal had succeeded in achieving its goals then Bush would have been able to use the Senate to block the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives, Bush would have been able to continue to appoint right-wing activists to the judiciary, Donald Rumsfeld might have been able to hang on to his post as Secretary of Defense, John Bolton might have succeeded in gaining confirmation as ambassador to the United Nations. Had Lambert succeeded, the consequences would have echoed through History.

WELL.  I think we can all agree that the Honorable A. Donald McEachin deserves a great deal of our thanks for helping Senator-elect Jim Webb (D-VA) win the election.  And thanking him is the LEAST we can do, pholks.  I think we should all make sure we actively help Mr. Lambert find a new job.  And by "find a new job", I mean "lose present job to the Honorable A. Donald McEachin."

What do you think?  Who's with me?


Comments



Benny Lambert (drmontoya - 12/7/2006 9:08:19 PM)
There's a word for him:

TURNCOAT

I guess he forgot he's a Democrat.



McEachin (drmontoya - 12/7/2006 9:10:54 PM)
He deserves all of our FULL support and he will have it. Don McEachin was an early early endorser of Jim Webb before the primary. Go Don Go!


Jaime (Kathy Gerber - 12/7/2006 9:18:20 PM)
If it weren't in the middle of the week I'd certainly attend.  Is there some place online to contribute to Delegate McEachin?

Also, FWIW, I did subscribe to the Richmond Free Press but haven't received a copy yet.  They said it takes several weeks.



Link (DukieDem - 12/7/2006 9:30:39 PM)
Here's a link to help out Delegate McEachin.

http://www.donaldmce...

Those of us who worked in the Richmond Office could not put into words how helpful Delegate McEachin was during the general. He deserves our full support.



Scratch that.. (DukieDem - 12/7/2006 9:32:50 PM)
How helpful he was during the ENTIRE election.


Thanks, Dukie (Kathy Gerber - 12/7/2006 9:34:05 PM)
That's quick service!


Support McEachin with $$, too. (vadem - 12/8/2006 12:50:59 AM)
During the months that McEachin worked for Webb's election (very, very actively I might add) he put all his heart and soul into this and did not use the time to do any fundraising for his own upcoming campaign.  If you aren't aware, he is barred by law to fundraise once the GA session begins in January, so the window of time he has to refill his coffers for a run against Lambert is NOW!!  For about the next month, McEachin has to maximize his fundraising.

If you are as grateful as I for what he did for Jim Webb and for Democrats across this state and this country, then part with a little $$ now for Donald.  Have a "Thank You Donald McEachin House Party" and remind people of his courage and steadfastness.  He deserves to be thanked by all of us.



When I First Started Looking at the Webb Campaign (Catzmaw - 12/7/2006 9:35:31 PM)
I started wondering who the big guy was who kept showing up at various campaign events.  I've seen films of him accompanying Webb on grip and greets, in the background at speeches and rallies, appearing in all manner of venues for Webb.  What I learned about Mr. McEachin is that once he picks a horse he backs him all the way.  He's got loyalty and dedication. He threw himself whole-heartedly into the Webb campaign and no doubt smoothed the way for him with folks who may otherwise not have voted for him.  He deserves our support. 

Oh, and as for Lambert's belief that his free speech rights might be infringed by holding the DPV rules against endorsing a non-Democratic against him, I wonder if the recent decision by Fed. Judge Claude Hilton against open primaries in Virginia might contain some analysis and precedent which would strengthen the DPV's position. 



Lambert should stick to optometry (teacherken - 12/7/2006 11:11:30 PM)
because he clearly does not understand law or constitutional principle.  DPV is not the government, and is therefore not bound by the restrictions of the Fist Amendment.  It is voluntary organization entitled to make its own rules.

Further, unless Lambert can demonstrate that the rules were changed after fact in order to specifically punish him, he cannot even claim a civil violation.  In fact, the Democratic party might be able to claim that since he violated the terms of his party membership and endorsement he is no longer entitled to use their label of Democrat.

Methinks it is not a discussion he really wants to have in public.



Lambert should stick to optometry (teacherken - 12/7/2006 11:12:04 PM)
because he clearly does not understand law or constitutional principle.  DPV is not the government, and is therefore not bound by the restrictions of the Fist Amendment.  It is voluntary organization entitled to make its own rules.

Further, unless Lambert can demonstrate that the rules were changed after fact in order to specifically punish him, he cannot even claim a civil violation.  In fact, the Democratic party might be able to claim that since he violated the terms of his party membership and endorsement he is no longer entitled to use their label of Democrat.

Methinks it is not a discussion he really wants to have in public.



Lambert might need his own services (vadem - 12/8/2006 12:43:24 AM)
Since he obviously missed reading the pledge he surely signed when joining the Richmond Dem Committee.  If its like the pledge on the membership application in Chesterfield, you pledge not to support any candidate running against the Democratic candidate.  Period.  He violated the pledge.


Time to clean house... (Kindler - 12/7/2006 10:18:06 PM)
I'd love to see Don McEachin take on Benedict Arnold Lambert.

BRING IT ON!