Direct Democracy? Hah!

By: Ellen
Published On: 8/2/2005 1:00:00 AM

Here's your carpetbagging California correspondent again. I just wanted to follow up on my recent post railing against the use of ballot initiatives (and their collateral damagers). You may recall that my main point was this: in spite of the fine words, "direct democracy," ballot initiatives have become the plaything of the special interests, and are contested as any election is, with big money.

Today's Los Angeles Times has a roundup of recent financial filings by the groups for and against the propositions that will be on the ballot in November ? Arnold Schwarzenegger's Special Election that into the bargain will cost California taxpayers upwards of $80 million. Whether defending turf or offending the bottom line (particularly notable in the Prop 78 v. Prop 79 prescription drug cost battle), those with the most at stake are raising funds in the gazillions.

Take particular note of this: "[Average people are] tired of relegating government to the election box."

Ultimately, policy decisions have to be made by our elected officials, so we know where the buck stops and can hold them accountable. Governance-by-initiative is a cop-out, leaving no one ? and everyone ? holding the bag. And fiscal governance by referendum is subject to abuse by all the same parties and for all the same reasons. Please, please, don't fall for it.

[Cross-posted, for California consumption, at The Broad View.]


Comments