Is This the Future of Virginia?

By: Lowell
Published On: 10/14/2006 7:53:12 AM

From George Allen's "hoedown" comes this picture of Allen dressed up as a cowboy with a bolo tie and a football in a pastoral setting with lots of neat fencing.  That's very nice, I suppose, if you yearn for the mythological America of, oh, 1820 or so.

The question is this:  does the picture of "Cowboy George" Allen, with a football, in a rural setting, say anything meaningful about the way that Virginia has been evolving, and is likely to keep evolving, into the 21st century?

A few factoids might help:

*In 2005, according to the USDA's Economic Research Service a whopping 85% of Virginians lived in urban or suburban settings.  That's 6.5 million Virginians out of 7.6 million total.  The remaining 15% lived in rural areas.

*According to the same source, Virginia's rural population has remained approcimately flat since 1980, while the urban/suburban population has grown by over 2 million people (from 4.3 million to 6.5 million).

*Interestingly, the average age of farmers in Virginia was around 57 as of 2002, and that age is increasing.
*Virginia's gross state product in 2004 was $329 billion.  Of this, only $1.2 billion (about 0.4%) was from "agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting."  The other 99.6% was from a variety of non-rural, non-agricultural sectors, including: 1) "government" (17%); 2) "real estate, rental and leasing" (12%); 3) "professional and technical services" (10%); 4) "nondurable goods manufacturing" (7%); 5) "finance and insurance" (7%); 6) "retail trade" (6%); and 7) "health care and social assistance" (5%). 

*Per-capita income in rural Virginia was $24,495 in 2004.  In contrast, per-capita income in "urban" Virginia was $38,144 (54% higher than rural) in that same year.

*The rural poverty rate in Virginia was 13.9% in 2003, nearly 50% higher than the 9.3% poverty rate seen in "urban" Virginia.

*The percentage of people completing college was 13.1% in rural Virginia in 2000, less than half the 32.6% college graduation rate for "urban" Virginia.

In sum, "rural" Virginia - the Virginia of "hoedowns," "cowboys," and picket fences - is an extremly small, relatively poor, and rapidly shrinking part of Virginia.  Overwhelmingly, Virginia today is an urban and suburban state, a highly educated state, a prosperous state, and a highly diverse one as well.  And it is become more that way - fast!

Let me emphasize that I believe a rural life can be a wonderful thing, and there's certainly nothing wrong with it whatsoever.  All I'm pointing out here is that the Virginia of George Allen's fantasies - not that he personally has ever lived it, coming from Southern California and now residing in a wealthy part of southern Alexandria - is a small and rapidly shrinking part of our state. 

As we move forward into the 21st century, it is likely to shrink even further as we move increasingly towards a high-tech, highly educated, urban/suburban, service-sector, globalized, highly-value-added economy.  The question is, does George Allen understand the New Virginia, or is he forever dreaming of the old Virginia, one that he didn't grow up in, one that he doesn't live in - although he certainly makes a big show of visiting it during election seasons (can we say "overcompensation?") - and one that hasn't existed for decades, if it ever existed at all?  I wonder.

Lowell Feld is Netroots Coordinator for the Jim Webb for US Senate Campaign.  The ideas expressed here belong to Lowell Feld alone, and do not represent those of Jim Webb, his advisors, staff, or supporters.


Comments



It's like two different states (Catzmaw - 10/14/2006 9:53:17 AM)
I grew up in a suburban Virginia which still had enough of its rural identity to have a stables located at one end of my development and a horse farm right up on Route 7 between Falls Church and Tysons Corner.  This was in the 60s. Virtually my entire neighborhood was white and made up primarily by migrants from the Blue Ridge and the Shenandoah who came to Fairfax looking for work.  People from other more prosperous neighborhoods were openly disdainful and referred to kids from Pimmit Hills as rednecks living in a "non-mobile trailer park".  In high school I had to hear kids from McLean refer to my neighborhood as "shitsville".  Now no one calls it that now, but it left an impression. 

Frankly, it makes me sad to see us losing so much of our rural identity.  The gulf between rural and urban in this state is quite wide, and sometimes right next door.  I have family in Berryville. They live hand to mouth on minimum wage jobs.  If you count the exes in the family they stretch down the mountains all the way to Staunton.  They tend to be undereducated, underpaid, uninsured, and ardently and unthinkingly Republican.  They know little about actual politics, but buy one hundred percent into the Republican line about the Democrats wanting to take their guns and give the country away to minorities.  They feel marginalized and forgotten, and resent very much the implicit assumption held by a lot of liberal whites that white and poor is not as bad as black and poor.  They're annoyed at the outsiders who are expanding into places like Berryville and then demanding that the farms not smell, the fire siren not sound for the volunteers (too noisy), that people stop parking their pickup trucks near the river so they can fish.  The list goes on, and the locals are pissed. 

Jim Webb is the first Democratic candidate to come along in a long time who has the bona fides to appeal to this segment of the population.  I agree that there is increased urbanization and education in Virginia, but it tends to be concentrated in the North and East.  Travel down the Valley and hook right, and almost nothing's changed, and not likely to change much, except maybe to get worse.  These are the people who need to hear from Jim Webb.  Their mountains are being strip-mined for coal and their rivers poisoned.  They've been taken for granted by the Republicans as a solid reliable vote for years.  We need to get them thinking again, but it means adjusting our own thought processes.



Thanks for the info Lowell (Gordie - 10/14/2006 9:54:11 AM)
What is sad about what you have written about the poverty of the rural areas is it does not have to be that way. The rural areas can attain the higher stand of living and still keep their ruralness. One of the problems is that there are people like George Allen who promote this life as glamous for their own selfish goals.
They ride in on their white horses as some sort of savior and convinence people there life is the best they can get and if they strive for other life stile they will lose there upbringing. For some reason they push their children away from their birth place just to keep their cost of living low.
The George Allen's of the world are just trying to keep a certain base and low wages so they can make lots of money off the backs of others.
These people have convinced others to get into land conservation groups and preserve large areas of land and to write ordinances to protect there land from developers. What does Virgil Goode so, "he sponsors a bill that developers can go right to Federal Court to get their way". By passing the lower court and sticking it to the local land owners and citizens. The court costs for local communities will be outlandish.
Their corruption goes far beyond getting a picture taken in somebody else's pasture.


The Assalt on Rural Virginians (tbrewste - 10/14/2006 11:26:24 AM)
First, I am a democrat and a Jim Webb supporter. With that said, I firmly disagree with your characterization of our rural citizens in Virginia. You fail miserably to recognize the positive attributes and contributions of these regions. Your emphasis is place on making rural residents appear as inhabitants of a wasteland whose heritage and way of life is well out of the mainstream of the urban and suburban populations of Virginia. Mr. Feld, we are important and we matter!

I am proud to be a citizen of the GREAT Southwest! Furthermore, Jim Webb as a statesman with a true connection to southwestern Virginia would certainly disagree with your characterization of his ancestral home place. However, you are correct about one thing, George Allen has fooled many with his “good old boy” image, not only in rural areas, but suburban and urban areas as well. A native of southern California, he does not represent Virginia’s values.



The Assault on R ural Virginia (tbrewste - 10/14/2006 11:30:52 AM)
Misspelling discovered in earlier post's subject. 


You are not reading what I wrote (Lowell - 10/14/2006 11:32:10 AM)
I think rural Virginia is great, beautiful, amazing, and I have nothing against it whatsoever. In addition, I believe that we are ALL "real" Virginians, and that we all have a great deal to offer.  All I'm saying is that George Allen does NOT represent the future of Virginia, nor does his phony-cowboy, 18th/19th century mythological rural point of view.  The future of Virginia is all about education, technology, trasnportation, and equal rights for all in a globalized economy.  The future of Virginia is NOT about George Allen's narrow view as to what constitutes the "real Virginia," that's for damn sure.


Thanks (tbrewste - 10/14/2006 11:39:20 AM)
I agree with your response. I detest the image that he projects while he is traveling in this region. He projects this image because there is a lack of substance, just rhetorical and symbolic grandstanding.

Thanks for your quick reply.



One more point. (Lowell - 10/14/2006 11:58:20 AM)
The "Hoedown" was held in Maidens, Virginia.  That's about as far from the beautiful terrain of Southwest Virginia as you can get.  It's actually off of Rt. 64, a few miles northwest of Richmond and southeast of Charlottesville.  It's located in Goochland County, which ranks #56 nationally in per-capita income, just ahead of Boulder, Colorado.  The median income for a household in the county is $56,307, and the median income for a family is $64,685.


By the way, these are all hard and fast facts (Lowell - 10/14/2006 11:33:47 AM)
I place no value judgment on them, I am simply stating them to make my point - that George Allen has no clue how to lead Virginia "forward, TOGETHER."


By the way, the idea for this post came from (Lowell - 10/14/2006 11:38:48 AM)
Waldo Jaquith, who wrote brilliantly on the same subject back on September 1.  Several people - although not many - misread what he wrote in the same way you misread what I wrote.  Sorry if there's been any misunderstanding due to my lack of writing skills.


the Irony (Teddy - 10/14/2006 1:27:07 PM)
can be tasted here. George Allen, phony country boy playing football in the pasture (hope he remembers to watch out for cow patties) has carefully cultivated his aw-sucks persona, which when examined seems made up based on a Hollywood template of Old South rural innocence and is far from reality--- he's, as we know, a Southern California surfer who now lives in a McMansion in (gasp!) fake Virginia, I mean Northern Virginia, making bundles off corporate largesse.

And Allen's opponent, Jim Webb, Scotch Irish in heritage with a family that has lived in Mountain Virginia for over 200 years, who exemplifies the values and history of the mountain rural South is scorned by phony Southern Allen as not being a real Virginian. Yet it is Webb who says that we need to level the playing field, that programs similar to affirmative action need to be devised to help all the disadvantaged, including those in rural areas. It is Webb who says raise the minimum wage (without any fancy extra tax benefits to already over-benefited businesses); it is Webb who says we need full access to affordable health care for everyone. It is Webb who advocates a 5 percent tax reduction for veterans (a disproportionate number of whom come from the poverty-stricken rural areas). And so on.

How can Allen by comparison ever be considered a representative of the rural Virginian?



Allen's rural pose (libra - 10/14/2006 7:44:04 PM)
"George Allen has no clue how to lead Virginia "forward, TOGETHER." -- Lowell

My husband calls Allen a "damn carpetbagger". Me, a "transplant Virginian" myself... I think he's just a Rhinestone Cowboy, who misheard the text of the song and thought it said "I'm a right strong cowboy"

PS He sure does seem to invoke his father -- one way or another -- every chance he gets, no? Here he is, in a cowboy hat, amongst the rolling hills and fences of -- supposedly -- rural Virginia (nicely mowed rolling hills and not a sign of an animal capable of leaving cow-pats, horse-apples or sheep-droppings ).. And what is he doing? Holding a football...

I guess it's quite wise, given that a horse is even harder for him to control (vide Buena Vista Labor DAy Parade) :)