A. Someone who bought, hook line and sinker, the Vice President's assertions that we would be greated as liberators by mobs of American Flag waving, democracy embracing throngs, and the Sec. of Defense's argument that it probably wouldn't last six months.
OR
B. Someone who went to Virginia's US Senate delegation and urged, vociferously, that they oppose the war because it would drag us into a protracted occupation with our soldiers becoming the targets for Muslim jihadists.
Wouldn't it make sense to elect the guy who was right rather than the guy who got it totally wrong? Who has a better grip on the reality that we face? Who has the ability to get us out of the mess with grace and honor?