George Allen: Only the Rich Should Have Property Rights

By: Mark
Published On: 8/18/2006 3:01:06 AM

In a press release today from the National Center for Public Policy Research, George Allen is revealed to be anti-property rights. Surprised? I didn't think so. {emphasis added in following quoted text}


Washington, D.C. - Nearly one year after the U.S. Supreme Court's shocking Kelo v. New London decision touched off a firestorm of bipartisan support for stronger property rights protections, some anti-property rights groups are receiving support from a surprising source:  Senator George Allen (R-VA).

Senator Allen is the chief sponsor of legislation that would create a massive federal "National Heritage Area" that would stretch from Charlottesville, VA, through Frederick County, MD, and end in Gettysburg, PA.  Such areas are best described as heavily regulated corridors where property rights may be strictly curtailed.

Allen's bill would deputize special interest groups -- many with clear anti-property rights agendas -- and federal employees to oversee land use policy in the corridor.

It gets better; join me, won't you?

"Senator Allen often describes himself as a 'Jeffersonian' conservative, which he defines as someone who doesn't like 'nanny, meddling, restrictive, burdensome government,'" said Peyton Knight, director of environmental and regulatory affairs at the National Center. "However, if you fail to support your rhetoric with substance, you're all hat and no cattle."

Sen. Allen's initiative in some ways resembles a pork-barrel earmark, as it disburses funds to pre-selected preservationist interest groups.  Unfortunately, it is even worse than an earmark, as it would threaten property rights by:

  1) Creating a "management entity" to oversee land use policy in the area composed of groups that have a record of being hostile to property rights.

  2) Directing this management entity to create an inventory of all property it wants "preserved," "managed" or "acquired."

  3) Giving the management entity the authority to disburse federal funds for the purpose of land acquisition and restricting land use - an enticement for such activities.

"This is a transparent effort by "not in my back yard" elitists to milk millions of dollars from the nation's taxpayers to mandate gentrification of their rural landscape.  These bluebloods want their pretty views and bucolic fields preserved in perpetuity at the expense of property rights, small landowners and farmers, and taxpayers," said Robert J. Smith, a senior fellow at the National Center.

"It is remarkably similar to the exclusionary zoning for 'green space' and 'open space' that roiled New Jersey politics and communities for a quarter century," Smith adds. "Such policies were ruled unconstitutional by the New Jersey Supreme Court in the Mount Laurel decisions for being economically and racially discriminatory, and as an effort to lock out low and moderate income families and especially people of color, blacks and Hispanics."

Mychal Massie, national chairman of the African-American leadership network Project 21, which is affiliated with the National Center, notes the impact of Allen's bill will be felt disproportionately.

"Senator Allen's Heritage Area scheme is further evidence of the chasm that develops between working families and elected representatives once they are in office," said Massie.  "Allen's measure would restrict and limit land use
to all but the very wealthiest, and would severely and unjustly handicap families and individuals of moderate means."

Dr. Roger Pilon, director of the Cato Institute's Center for Constitutional Studies, notes the irony that overzealous preservationists at Thomas Jefferson's Monticello are corrupting Jefferson's legacy, ostensibly in an effort to protect it: "They want to traduce Jefferson's views in order to save his views."

Citizens of Virginia, Maryland and Pennsylvania might look to property owners caught within the boundaries of the Yuma Crossing National Heritage Area in Arizona to catch a glimpse of their possible future.

The Chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Resources has filed a report explaining the situation in Yuma.  The report, which accompanies legislation designed to amend the Yuma Heritage Area in order to protect property owners, states:

"When the Yuma Crossing Heritage Area was authorized in 2000, the public in Yuma County did not understand the scope of the project and was surprised by the size of the designation... Concerns were raised by citizens about the size of the designation and the potential for additional Federal oversight. The fear of adverse impacts on private property rights were realized when local government agencies began to use the immense heritage area boundary to determine zoning restrictions."

Thomas Jefferson was quite clear in his views regarding property rights when he wrote:  "The true foundation of republican government is the equal right of every citizen in his person and property and in their management."

Robert J. Smith adds: "No one supporting such plans and legislation attacking the underlying principles of a free society can conceivably then have the hubris to attempt to wrap themselves in the mantle of Mr. Jefferson's belief in individual liberty, or in Ronald Reagan's inclusive conservative Republicanism."

"It dishonors 250 years of American history and freedom-from Abraham Lincoln's genuine Hallowed Grounds in Gettysburg to Thomas Jefferson's Monticello mountaintop," he said.

Whew! I know that's a lot to digest. This is the gist of it: George Allen only wants property rights for the wealthy and privleged class, where he considers himself to reside. All his wealthy buddies and donors. He is above the citizens he represents, so naturally, he would be in favor of restricting property rights.

This has to be stopped. Call Allen's offices. Email George Allen about this outrage. Read more about this at the links below. We can't let the snobby elites in this country take our property rights away.

As this press release states, "All hat and no cattle".

For more information on this issue, see "The Journey Through Hallowed Ground National Heritage Area: An Example of How Pork-Barrel Politics Can Threaten Local Rule and Property Rights," by Peyton Knight, available online at http://www.nationalcenter.org/NPA540HallowedGround.html, or "Assertions vs. Reality: The Journey Through Hallowed Ground National Heritage Area Act of 2006," by Peyton Knight, available online at http://www.nationalcenter.org/NPA548.html.


Comments



Cross Posted on Kos (Mark - 8/18/2006 5:22:32 AM)
http://www.dailykos....

Thanks.



Great story, Mark! (Kathy Gerber - 8/18/2006 6:27:09 AM)
This just gets crazier and crazier...


Thank You (Mark - 8/18/2006 6:39:12 AM)
Kathy!!!


I don't have time to research, but (teacherken - 8/18/2006 6:43:52 AM)
I have a vague memory that some of the sources upon which you rely to criticize Allen have opposed ANY preservation schemes, whether they be of Civil War battlefields, historic district, or the like.  They are absolutists on the idea of property rights and some don't even like the idea of zoning restrictions.

While I do not know the specifics of what Allen is proposing/supporting in this case, I happen to be a strong supporter of certain elements of preservation.  Absent preservationists Brandy Station, site of the largest cavalry battle in N America, would have been turned into an auto race track,we would ahve had a large Disney theme park destroying a huge chunk of N Virginia and overloading further roads that cannot fully andle current capacity. 

It seems to me that in our desire to diminish Allen's standing we need to be careful whose arguments we use, lest we imply a willing to follow an end justifies the means methodology, an approach with which I do not agree.



Right on, Ken. This issue cuts both ways. (RayH - 8/18/2006 7:41:19 AM)

Some property rights advocates are developers, opposed to any restrictions on their quest for profits without regard to greenspace, historic preservation, or basic infrastructure. While this example definitely shows an inconsistent philosophy in George Allen, it has the potential to divide us.


Ouch! (Joan K Nyne - 8/18/2006 2:10:08 PM)
I'd rather have a colonoscopy than agree with gfa about anything, but this may be semi-legit, at least.  I have seen photos of him decked out in a Confederate uniform, the Civil War reenactment community is pretty large, and a lot of them, and of folks who do other periods as well, are really adamant about preserving as much of the military heritage of the country as possible.  I'm inclined to agree, partly because I do, and partly just to keep a few trees and a little open space in the State.

It's not often we get to see a right-winger proposing that the Federal government *buy* land.  It's just possible that the POS has come up on the correct side of something for once.



Does history repeat itself? (kevinceckowski - 8/18/2006 9:17:02 AM)
Charlottesville, VA, through Frederick County, MD, and end in Gettysburg, PA.

Does he meet Abe along the way?



COMMENT HIDDEN (I.Publius - 8/18/2006 9:31:29 AM)


If Rove/Wadhams/Roberston is fer it, you keep in step! (RayH - 8/18/2006 9:45:19 AM)

Yours is a neo-conservative dialectic; it has a different slant than the Stalinist one, but tends toward authoritarianism just the same. Too bad your canned message is spoiled and moldy. People who consume it try to contain the bile in their anal-retentive fashion, but it always spills out uncontrollably.


COMMENT HIDDEN (I.Publius - 8/18/2006 8:56:58 PM)


Read my earlier post. (RayH - 8/18/2006 9:40:23 PM)

I haven't called you names.


But what about Race (Matt in VA - 8/18/2006 9:45:10 AM)
please... don't get it go...


Sorry, Matt n/t (Kathy Gerber - 8/18/2006 10:46:41 AM)


dkos diary to read (Matt in VA - 8/18/2006 1:27:37 PM)
on the WAPO softpedaling Allen's racial history. This is the kind of thing that needs attention if you want to hurt Allen at the polls.

http://www.dailykos....



Great diary. For all those who say the Post... (Lowell - 8/18/2006 2:22:20 PM)
is the "liberal media," they really haven't been paying attention.  Or, they're being disingenuous and cynical in claiming such a thing.


The text (Kathy Gerber - 8/18/2006 10:45:40 AM)
Mark linked to the text of the bill on DK.

The name of the area would be the Hallowed Ground Corridor. 

At the core of the huge protected region would be the John Mosby Heritage area.

The primary features are already preserved and protected.


Included among the numerous historically
significant sites, structures, battlefields, and districts
are 8 homes of former United States Presidents, the
largest concentration of Civil War battlefields in the
country, the greatest concentration of rural historic
districts in the country, 13 National Historic Land-
marks, 2 World Heritage Sites, 15 Main Street
Communities, 13 National Park Units, and 47 His-
toric Districts, and the largest concentration of
Rural Historic Districts in the country, which are
collectively and individually of national significance
in the early history of our Nation.

Visit http://www.hallowedg...

There is a listing of sites with African American Heritage interest.  One of the sites is a black high school established in 1941, the year my mom graduated from high school herself.  It's relevance is that it is Loudoun's first black high school and was named after Frederick Douglass.

Another featured site with African American Heritage is Bremo Slave Chapel, constructed in 1935.  But there's a problem.  The Chapel is not even in the proposed Hallowed Ground region; it is 38 miles south of the southern end of the region, Charlottesville. 



About the only good thing Allen has done (Not A Wingnut - 8/18/2006 11:14:03 AM)
Try and learn something about a topic before you post on it. (If you want to carry water for the pave our heritage crowd GOP development crowd just day so)

  I am as liberal as they come, and I support this legislation for many reasons. Allen has broken with the extreme right of his party by supporting this legislation

I am disappointed that a democratic blog has such a weak understanding of the land use issues facing Northen Virginia. First and formost - the term "property rights" was dreamed up by the same folks who call the estate tax the "death tax".

  The so called property rights crowd cares about nothing but being able to develop their land for maximum cash with no thought to the "property rights" of neighboring property owners. No thoughts to the water supplies of neighbors, no thoughts to the impact on the tourism dollar, no thought to the local tax base, just let us build what we want to and fuck anyone who tries to impose reasonable controls.

The next time someone tries to open a landfill, or a stripclub, or a sex shop in your neighborhood shut up and sit and your hands. Isn't it their right as a property owner?

One poor ass weakly reasoned post Mark. Check your sources next time.



Kathy Gerber (Not A Wingnut - 8/18/2006 11:23:43 AM)
...and Kathy.

"At the core of the huge protected region would be the John Mosby Heritage area.

The primary features are already preserved and protected."

I guess you missed the golf course going in next to histric Oak Hill, birthplace of a president, or the development that broke ground next to Oatlands (both Oak Hill and Oatlands are National landmarks.

I live in the John Mosby Heritage area- to say it is preserved and protected is assinine. The bulldozers are running 24/7 building stripmalls and tract housing. Our taxes have gone out of site building new roads (not that you would know it from the traffic!) new schools, providing suburban style services.

We are paving our over heritage and the farmland we will need to feed us in the future.

Do you work for the development community?



I just read about this today. (Kathy Gerber - 8/18/2006 12:09:38 PM)
Taxes were driving serious farmers out of Loudoun down to places like Giles at least since the 1970's.

In the short term is is difficult for many to reconcile the farmland paving as critical when existing family farms are finding it increasingly difficult to survive or actually going under.

No I do not work for the development community, nor am I at the no-growth extreme.  We have growth issues in my own county as a matter of fact so I'm not inclined to take on such a divisive issue from another community.  I have new neighbors that shoot off fireworks for days on end and shoot guns the rest of the time.  And while my natural tendency is to be territorial or NIMBY, I try to work on this.

I also have a concern about affordable housing for working class and lower income people.  I suppose the most knowledgeable blogger on this is Vivian Paige.

The entire state has an incredibly rich history and I do question why one area should be particularly privileged in that regard.  That's how it seems to someone who does not own property in the area as you do. And part of the touted richness of the area involves a slave church nearly 40 miles away.

Didn't Mosby at one point consider establishing his own nation in that region?  I thought I read that somewhere.



consider establishing his own nation in that region? (loboforestal - 8/18/2006 12:38:41 PM)
Yeah, it's called "West Virginia".  Right?


Which president (lwumom - 8/18/2006 12:52:26 PM)
was born at Oak Hill?


Come tour the area before it is gone (Not A Wingnut - 8/18/2006 2:06:40 PM)
Kathy- Thank you for your level headed response. I will try to go point by point on your post

Taxes have given the small farmer in NVA some issues- mainly due to increased land values from residential developmental pressures. I don't know what you mean by "serious" farmers being driven out of the area- if you mean traditional dirt farmers (soybeans, corn and other mainstream products) you are right. Loudoun lost many to more rural areas of Virginia, and they ain't fairing that much better down your way.
The family farmers who have tried to produce huge crops on a large scale have a hard time keeping up with the agri-corporations. The farmers who have adapted to niche markets and who diversify their products continue to do well in NVA- better than the "serious” farmers.

More farms in NVA continue to be lost to bad estate planning and poor response to market pressures than increased tax burdens. Preserving the Mosby heritage areas helps protect our rural economy, which puts far more into the local tax base than it withdraws (unlike residential housing)

The second myth you speak of is affordable housing- let me assure you that no developers in LC are trying to built affordable housing (unless you consider houses starting at $600,000 "affordable") Most of our new residential construction is 6000 plus square foot McMansions- there simply isn't money to be made building affordable housing when you could build $1,000,000 homes instead. The "property rights" movement doesn’t care diddley about affordable housing.

Regarding your last point- Yes, we are blessed with a rich historical background in all of Virginia, but NVA is (more like WAS) something special. Look at a map- the proximity to Maryland and Washington DC made this area ground zero during the Civil War- Winchester changed hands over 60 times during the war.

The proximity to Washington DC has made this area a possible tourism goldmine, similar to Williamsburg. You can still walk down dirt roads surveyed by George Washington which look very much as they were 200 years ago- all less than 50 miles from the nations capital. I ask you; where else in the world can you find such historically rich countryside less than 50 miles from the capital? Comparing Giles County historical sites to Loudoun, or Fauquier is comparing apples and oranges- please come tour the area so you will see what I mean.

A good example of the differences between the 2 areas could be demonstrated by a friend recent experience- he bought a 400 parcel in Bath Country and started the process of putting the land under a conservation easement, restricting future development- nobody (Virginia Outdoors Foundations ect..) was interested in holding the easement. They simply do not consider the land to be at risk when compared to other areas in the state.

…and yes the other poster caught my mistake- James Monroe (with Jefferson’s help) built Oak Hill but was not born there. I guess we can make a golf course/ strip mall out of it after all.

...and Mark- checked your sources yet? You might be surprized to find you are on the same page as Dick Black, Eugene Delgaudio, Mick Stanton, and other right wing GOPers.....are these your people and will carrying their water help Webb win NVA?



McMansions (RayH - 8/18/2006 3:19:34 PM)

Whenever I drive by a McMansion development miles away from stores, schools, workplaces, etc., I think about whether I would want to live there and spend more time driving.

During the last gas price hike, I imagined what those neighborhoods would be like if driving became unfeasible. McMansion ghettos, maybe? 



The corridor (lwumom - 8/18/2006 6:09:20 PM)
runs along Route 15 in Virginia in some of the places that have been economically disadvantaged in the past. People in those areas need jobs and don't want to travel for hours to get there. They need an offset from business to keep property taxes down. There is alot of growth in the Zion's Crossroads area that is GOOD for the people in that area.  It supplies industry as well as housing that is more affordable than that in the over-priced Albemarle area.

I can understand the concern that there are numerous historical battlefields in the area of Louisa County.  One such area was land where Lafayette once stood, right off Route 15 in the Green Springs area.  But this land has been protected by LOUISA COUNTY for hundreds of years.  Why do we need the Federal Government to suddenly take over?  Because George Allen needs to look like he's been doing something for the past 6 years.

It's not historical preservation that's the issue here.  It's keeping the riff-raff out of the rich neighborhoods.



OOPS (lwumom - 8/18/2006 6:32:54 PM)
Who is Cate Magennis Wyatt, executive director of The Journey Through Hallowed Ground?  A former REAL ESTATE DEVELOPER. 


not so fast Mom (Not A Wingnut - 8/18/2006 7:26:25 PM)
Mom- you are playing into their hands with the rich people vs poor people rhetoric. The so called property rights people wish to muddy the water with a little class warfare- and it works every time.

Newsflash- the sharecropper families I grew up and went to school with are long gone from this county. Don’t know what happened to most of them, but unfettered development didn’t do them any favors ‘round here.

Furthermore, Ms  Mageniss Wyatt’s experience with development brings know-how and common sense to the table - Kate has received high marks from everyone she works with and I fail to follow your logic that her life experience disqualifies her from involvement in preservation issues.

Lastly- check out the bill before you knock it – it does very little other than recognize one of Virginia’s assets- sort of like recognizing that the Chesapeake Bay is important to Virginia, or do too many rich people live there?

C and P from http://www.hallowedg...  the proposed district includes
• Eight U.S. Presidential Homes:
o Jefferson’s Monticello
o Madison’s Montpelier
o Monroe’s Oakhill
o Ashlawn Highland
o Zachary Taylor’s home
o Eisenhower’s Cottage
o Theodore Roosevelt’s Cabin, Pine Knot
o Kennedy’s Middleburg home
• John Marshall’s Home
• Gen. George Marshall's Home
• The largest collection of Civil War Battlefields in the country
• The greatest concentration of Rural Historic Districts in the United States (11)
• Sites from the Colonial times and Revolutionary War, as well as the War of 1812 , Native American history, as it was the trading route for the Susquehannock and Iroquois, among others.
• African American history: with Frederick, Maryland hosting one of the country’s largest collections of underground railroad sites and Harpers Ferry the home of John Brown’s raid and the first American meeting of the Niagara Movement, considered by many as the beginning of the modern Civil Rights era.
• World Heritage Sites: Monticello and the Rotunda, University of Virginia
• 13 National Historic Landmarks
• 47 Historic Districts
• Approximately one million acres already on the National Register
• Numerous scenic rivers, roads and landscapes
• 13 National Park Units

http://www.hallowedg...

http://www.hallowedg...

Mark- next time do a little research before posting a weak ass cut and paste from a wingnut publication



Not A Wingnut (lwumom - 8/18/2006 8:02:16 PM)
The point I think we're all trying to make is that it's really scary to give eminent domain to a government with a history of raping the US in every way.

What if the government suddenly decided that YOUR property was desirable for themselves or a third party?



I guess I will call you "Not" (Mark - 8/18/2006 9:26:06 PM)
There are two things here; I can correct any mistakes or faulty logic in my diary by continuing to post. That's what I intend to do, and learn from it.

You, however, will still be an asshole for talking to people the way you do.

If you want to teach us all something, write a damned diary and put us out of our simple-minded misery.

I will have more to say about this issue in a continuing discussion, will you bring more invective with your information? I hope not. It's not the way to have a discussion about such important issues.

Ease up, "Not", if that's really even your real name. (That's a joke, just in case you are also humor-impaired.)



Blinded by Allen hate? (Not A Wingnut - 8/19/2006 10:12:05 AM)
Mark- thanks for getting back to me. I was hoping you would address the content of your post. I am disappointed you instead decided to hurl names at those (me) who called a spade a spade. Invective? Pot meet kettle

I took a breath after your response- Frankly I had no idea what you were talking about in regards to posting a diary so I took some time to look around on the site. My first surprise was that anybody can make a post that in theory will show up on the front page. Huh? I was almost as surprised by this as I was yesterday finding the rating system in the comment section.

I originally surfed over here because of interest in the Allen /Webb Senate race. I found the link on NLS and followed his platinum recommendation. All I really want from this site is accurate up to date information on the Senate race. I have no desire to post diaries. I have no longing to rate everyone’s comments for accuracy, style and prose, and no hunger for flame wars. I just want to know what is going on within the campaigns, and look at whatever poll numbers are available.

Imagine my surprise yesterday when I logged on a saw the hateful divisive words of Dick Black and Eugene Delgaudio staring me in the face. I assume you know who Dick Black and Delgaudio are? If not, go for a google. My reaction to their words and platforms may have been sharp and cutting, and may have hurt your feelings, but if you parrot the words of the extreme right wing of the GOP don’t expect thank you notes from my crowd. Your post was inaccurate, and merely a regurgitation of the GOP pro-developer lobby and I labeled it as such. I expect more from my informational sources.

Aside from an involvement in local NVA politics (which you might want to brush up on) another reason your post affronted me so much was because I have seen first hand how well the language and message you spoke works to divide the electorate. Immediately, you had comments from readers who bought into the divisive class warfare hook line and….Preservation is for rich people ‘cause poor people don’t care about their history? The government is screwing the United States? They’re gonna take my land? Zoning laws are evil?

All one has to do is mention imminent domain and the recent Supreme Court case and people get riled up- People without legal degrees. People who don’t know how to digest a SCOTUS decision, and who certainly have no understanding how said ruling will apply to Virginia Law.

I do hope you continue to educate yourself on preservation issues in our Commonwealth. Virginia has a rich history which we are losing by the day. I also hope you research your topics further and figure out which side of the aisle you are speaking for before you post- merely parroting the words of the extreme right is not the way to discuss such an important issue.



I think this deserves a diary (Bubby - 8/19/2006 10:29:54 AM)
A diary that collects the contrary points that you have thrown out.  We don't have to agree on every point. But we do have to be informed and no better way than to see many sides of the issue.  I'm sick about what is happening to Virginia, and the reckless, unsustainable, sprawling development of our open spaces.  It is a complex issue that deserves in-depth analysis. Thanks for participating.

This is an topic that Jim  Webb will inherit in November, and if Loudoun (and this diary) is any indication, it will be a contentious issue.



Are all of those sites (lwumom - 8/18/2006 7:47:59 PM)
not on the National Historical Registry already?


what was that?? (Not A Wingnut - 8/18/2006 8:16:01 PM)
I'm sorry Mom- your last 2 posts make no sense to me.

The government is raping the United States? ugh...I have nothing to say to that.

Aren't these sites already on the historical record? ugh...yeah, most of them. All the more reason to recognize the unique historical nature of the corridor.



Busted (lwumom - 8/18/2006 10:09:03 PM)


List of National Historical Landmarks (lwumom - 8/19/2006 2:50:31 AM)
http://www.cr.nps.go...

Click on the appropriate link.