Great Webb Flyer
By: Lowell
Published On: 6/6/2006 8:38:56 AM
A friend of mine put together the ultimate "killer ap" flyer for Jim Webb. Check it out here in black and white, and here in color. If you like it, print it. Make a few hundred copies and distribute them all over the place. C'mon, we've got 2,500 volunteers for Webb; if everyone makes and distributes 100 copies, that would be 250,000 flyers handed out. Let's do it!
Comments
Awesome Flyer! (Alicia - 6/6/2006 9:41:50 AM)
Printing right now....
Warner (va.walter - 6/6/2006 9:44:53 AM)
I know it'll never happen but I'd love to hear Warner's take on that flyer. While it is honest and never says Warner has endorsed Webb, the uninformed reader will absolutely read it as so. I think it can fairly be characterized as misleading. I have a feeling Webb folks would have cried foul had Miller done the same.
All that said, this is how you play the political game and the reality is that Webb should have started playing it a long time ago.
Miller has been mentioning Warner (Alicia - 6/6/2006 9:53:59 AM)
since Day 1 - before Webb even got in the race. Funny, since Warner approached Webb first, last summer.
I'm sure Warner would approve. (my guess, since he likes to be on the winning side of things...)
You may be right. (va.walter - 6/6/2006 10:26:22 AM)
The Warner dynamic has been one of the fascinating things about this race from day 1.
Just make certain you report it to the campaign as a gift in kind (JC - 6/6/2006 9:59:49 AM)
Federal law says you must report these things. If you do make copies and distribute make certain you report it to Webb's campaign. The good news: it counts towards his fundraising totals.
Great flyer!! (summercat - 6/6/2006 2:39:58 PM)
Thanks!!
Excellent Poster (xcurmudgeon - 6/6/2006 3:45:25 PM)
Very well done!
Please let people know about it. (Lowell - 6/6/2006 3:51:59 PM)
Print and distribute as widely as possible. In my opinion, if Democrats know who's supporting Jim Webb, they'll be far more likely to vote for him.
Not to be anal or anything like that... (LAS - 6/6/2006 8:34:28 PM)
but shouldn't it be "whom" rather than "who?"
Otherwise, looks very good!