Republican AG McDonnell 'executive order on gay hiring unconstitutional'

By: Corey
Published On: 2/24/2006 2:00:00 AM

Today, Republican Attorney General Robert McDonnell issued a seven page opinion saying the executive order signed by Governor Tim Kaine that prohibits discrimination in state hiring because of sexual orientation is unconstitutional.  McDonnell "issued his ruling at the request of Del. Robert F. Marshall, R-Prince William, a sponsor last year of a proposed constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage and a frequent author of anti-abortion legislation".  The AP has the full story.

Marshall, the most outspoken House Republican added "First, there's been no demonstration that homosexuals, as a class, are subjected to discrimination," he said. "Second, I see it as a way to give legal status to sodomy and other practices homosexuals engage in."

Democrat Tim Kaine countered the statements by Republicans McDonnell and Marshall with several statements:

Kaine, a lawyer, said he had "some grave doubts" the opinion's legal accuracy and would not rescind it.

"I'm not going to tell my agency heads and cabinet secretaries that they're now free to discriminate," Kaine said.

"I guess somebody who felt wounded by this could try to file some suit ordering me to allow people to discriminate, but I would find that to be kind of weird," Kaine said.

Kaine's office said 14 of the 19 Fortune 500 corporations based in Virginia have sexual orientation discrimination bans in effect as do eight of the state's top 10 employers.

The article also adds that Senator's Warner and Allen, along with McDonnell's predecessor Jerry Kilgore all have policies that ban this type of discrimination. Furthermore "Sixty of the 100 members of the House of Delegates and 24 of the 40 senators have either issued statements or signed pledges that sexual orientation would not figure into whom they employ on their legislative staffs."

McDonnell's spokesman Tucker Martin countered with what has become a talking point of the Virginia Republican leader's "If this order was about puppies, it would have the same result," (remember the ridiculous references to turtles and goats earlier in  the year).

Virginia Republican leaders =  Discrimination okay
Virginia Democratic leaders = Discrimination illegal



Comments



The Governor should (Sophrosyne - 4/4/2006 11:33:05 PM)
The Governor should be ashamed of himself- trying to create unecessary policy that rightfully falls under the pervue of the General Assembly.


This is such a hot-b (summercat - 4/4/2006 11:33:05 PM)
This is such a hot-button thing.  The AG should be ashamed of himself.  If all these homophobic policies are followed, VA should be looking at bigtime civil rights suits.  Wonder what Englin will have to say?


Sophrosyne: From (Lowell - 4/4/2006 11:33:05 PM)
Sophrosyne:  From the Virginian-Pilot:

"The governor is flabbergasted that the attorney general would opine that the governor cannot instruct his management team not to discriminate," said Kevin Hall.

Hall said Kaine believes his decision to expand employment protections to gay and lesbian workers is "not only morally right but legally proper." The spokesman emphasized that the executive order covers only agencies under Kaine's direct supervision.

"We're not presuming that this is the policy of the judicial branch or the legislative branch, although it certainly ought to be," Hall said.

That pretty much sums it up right there.



J. Sarge, you didn't (Sophrosyne - 4/4/2006 11:33:05 PM)
J. Sarge, you didn't understand my point- I suggest you read McDonnell's ruling (assuming you haven't already) where he explained that this IS a separation of powers issue and that the E.O. was invalid because it in effect was creating policy... which is the job of the legislature.  This is what I was talking about, not some AG-Gov thing.

I am well aware that the AG and Gov are part of the Executive Branch... my point was that Raising Kaine didn't even discuss the basis for the ruling but went off on the usual rant.  Maybe if they had discussed some substance you would have understood my previous point.



Gotta love how you f (Sophrosyne - 4/4/2006 11:33:05 PM)
Gotta love how you folks don't even discuss the legal reasoning behind the ruling.  You love the "separation of powers" doctrine when it helps you, and reject it when it doesn't.


I don't want to be e (Mark T. Blair - 4/4/2006 11:33:05 PM)
I don't want to be elitist but I find it a little ironic that Mcdonnel presumes to correct Kaine's supposed misunderstanding of the law.  In terms of legal resumes, Kaine dwarfs his AG.


Bob McDonnell once a (Lowell - 4/4/2006 11:33:05 PM)
Bob McDonnell once again lives up to his nickname.


Agreed. This is cert (Corey - 4/4/2006 11:33:05 PM)
Agreed. This is certainly not an unplanned event and has everything to do with November's election.  I wouldn't be surprised if some Republican leaders were hoping some of these anti-gay bills and constitutional amendments fail, if only so they can bring them up again next year, and the year after that, .....


This is all designed (Teddy - 4/4/2006 11:33:05 PM)
This is all designed to ramp up the gay issue for the upcoming elections. We should ramp up discussion of the unconstitutionality, futility, and assininity of the gay marriage amendment. Can't we get some legal opinions of our own? And, what does the non sequiter of puppies have to do with anything? I guess you either get it, or you don't, like 2+2=4.