What will arise?

By: Josh
Published On: 10/9/2008 12:49:09 AM

A friend of mine from college was in town today and I got a chance to sit down for lunch with him.  His career has him working very closely with international financial markets and the conversation we had today was truly fascinating.

"Every central bank in the world dropped rates 50 basis points and the market's still dropping!   This is free fall and nobody can do anything about it.  We're watching the end of capitalism as we know it."  Unfortunately, he may be right:


Central banks around the world have cut interest rates by 50 basis points in an unprecedented move to breathe new life into the ailing global economy.

The Bank of England, the European Central Bank and the Federal Reserve along with central banks in Switzerland, China, Canada and Sweden have collectively cut rates by half a percentage point.

Despite these astonishing and unprecedented actions by central banks worldwide, markets continue to slide, with no end in sight.

If this is the fall of the economic system created by the market fundamentalists, and it appears that it is, then we all have to begin to ask, what will arise to replace it?  The most likely answer, is, unfortunately, quite terrifying.
For a long time the greatest rising power in the world has been the multinational corporation.  As the existing banking structure collapses, we're looking at the end of the final constraint on the multinationals.  What is increasingly likely, is that a core of powerful multinationals will emerge with ultimate control of the international banking system.  

The ramifications of this are more than alarming.  If the multinational supersedes the nation as the dominant power paradigm in the world, complete with banking control, then finally market fundamentalism may break free from the conventions of morality, humanity and the common good which governments are supposed to embody.  Once the only value of a tree is its wood, the only value of water is its effect in industrial processing, and air the only value of air is its capacity to hold pollution, what becomes of the value of human life, dignity, freedom, or the other things Americans hold dear?   What becomes of American values if the only value in the world is the bottom line?

In order to face the coming effort to rebuild the world economic system, Americans must enter this phase of rebuilding with some important concepts firmly in mind:

Monetization: Nothing in human experience has managed to stop the abuse of natural resources at the hands of industrial processing.  We are reaching the end of the "tragedy of the commons", we're basically running out of resources to exploit. Take a few minutes to explore The Story of Stuff before you continue.

Until true costs become integrated into all legal enterprises, 90% of all stuff extracted from the earth will continue to find its way to landfill within 6 months as is currently the case.  Human rights, worker rights, environmental concerns, human trafficking,  disease and poverty relief worldwide will continue to fall by the wayside of the world economic order.  

Business must pay for what it gets.

Like carbon credits or sky trust schemes, all natural resources will need to be monetized and included in the costs of goods.  Some businesses will need to go away, but that's fine, some businesses are too destructive to be allowed to exist, which brings us to...

Regulation:  The solution to our current financial crisis is actually quite simple.  The bill that Phil Gramm blasted through congress in the dark of night as Bill Clinton was preparing to exit from the world stage, eliminated Glass-Steagll and directly precipitated our current economic disaster.  In it, a completely unregulated section of finance was created which basically amounted to insurance bets on whether or not some assets would default.  Here's a bundle of mortgages, I bet they'll fail, you bet they won't.  This kind of junk is what is now called "toxic assets", and it creates what amounts to something on the order of $60 Trillion in liabilities to the world banking system.  It's the cement galoshes, dragging the world economy to the bottom of the river.  Eliminate those instruments and you eliminate the current disaster.  

What that fix wouldn't address is the fact that nearly every area of financial dealing in America was left essentially unregulated by Milton Friedman cultists like Graham, Bush, and McCain.  Trust in the system will require that when uninformed prospective home buyers go to a mortgage lender, that buyer can trust that the lender won't allow the purchase of a house the buyer can't afford.  Trust in the system will require that those who regulate finances are not the ones who benefit from the financial transactions.  Regulations are necessary, and they will be re-introduced, because this current disaster has done to Reaganomics what the fall of the Berlin Wall did to Socialism - discredited it utterly.

Education:  When Broder described Sarah Palin as emblematic of a terminal "cancer" on the body of the Republican party, he wasn't talking about her vicious partisanship, vendetta mindset, or even her profligate financial record.  He was talking about her as the embodiment of a worldview that hates ideas.  Much like President Bush, Palin violently despises education, knowledge, discourse, and educated informed decision making of all kinds.  That vaunted war on reason has nihilisticly driven the value of knowledge toward zero.  It's not what you know, it's what you are, and if you aren't like me, you're evil.  That is the American Exceptionalism of Sarah Palin, a thinly veiled cover for racism, bigotry, hatred and every driving force of the death culture that is animating the Conservative zombie today.

Education is a human right.  Solid education must be available to all children in America and in the world.  It should begin as early as possible, in order to free parents to make a living, and begin a process of lifelong self-directed learning.  There should be a strong grounding in mathematics and engineering, as well as arts and music education available to all, regardless of class, wealth, race, creed, or location.  And education must include financial education so that we never again have a nation filled with so many ill-informed sheep, that they can accept a believe that unregulated markets can sustainably function.
---
If the new world financial structure does not include monetization, regulation, and education, there is a looming distopia on the horizon. Anyone who's seen the movie Wall-E, will feel it instinctively, but here's a quick view of it from the Atlantic way back in 1992.

Jihad vs McWorld

Just beyond the horizon of current events lie two possible political futures-both bleak, neither democratic. The first is a retribalization of large swaths of humankind by war and bloodshed: a threatened Lebanonization of national states in which culture is pitted against culture, people against people, tribe against tribe-a Jihad in the name of a hundred narrowly conceived faiths against every kind of interdependence, every kind of artificial social cooperation and civic mutuality. The second is being borne in on us by the onrush of economic and ecological forces that demand integration and uniformity and that mesmerize the world with fast music, fast computers, and fast food-with MTV, Macintosh, and McDonald's, pressing nations into one commercially homogenous global network: one McWorld tied together by technology, ecology, communications, and commerce. The planet is falling precipitantly apart AND coming reluctantly together at the very same moment.

Nations have already ceded nearly unlimited power to multinational corporations, but they have largely remained constrained by the power and size of America's economy.  What American market fundamentalists have universally failed to acknowledge is that the market doesn't give a care about America.  Schumpeter's principle of creative destruction implies that only that which is viable is necessary.  Once America becomes denuded of it's market power, if it does not have powerful value to provide to the world, there is nothing in economics to compel the continuation of the American experiment.

As Americans, it is critical for us to understand, that American values must be protected and compelled.  Markets don't define values, they define value. Responsibility, empathy, and aspiration must be incorporated into the system. If America fails to employ its international competitive advantages in order to build value and it's regulatory power to control markets, nothing can protect America from the onslaught of a rising, megalithic, international corporate banking regime.  America must bring its knowledge, experience, and power to bear lest the singular profit motive overthrow the people and governments, ultimately precipitating an even greater dustbowl economy than the one the world is currently forced to endure.

What will arise?  Ultimately it's up to us.  We'd better act wisely and soon.


Comments



My views on this... (ericy - 10/9/2008 7:57:35 AM)

The financial crisis is really just the first of several crises that are looming.  The others include peak oil, climate change and the 800-lb gorilla in the room - overpopulation.  

My own view is that over the next 100 years or so that human population will decline to more sustainable levels, but that the economic system that we have wasn't designed to deal with a shrinking world.



I disagree that this a boon for big corps (tx2vadem - 10/9/2008 9:52:53 AM)
The existing global financial structure is what has created big corporations.  That goes away and then these giant institutions go away too.  I don't see this leading to more massive corps because they would need capital to become more massive.  And no one is interested in big deals like that from a debt perspective.  And the equity market is in such a hole, it is hard to see that supporting big mergers.  If this is a boon for big corps, I don't see it.

If anything, I see this as a triumph for big government not big corporations.  Iceland has just nationalized its entire banking system.  We have stepped into the financial market in a big way: organizing mergers, lending to private companies, taking over private companies...  Milton Friedman is spinning in his grave.  And all of his acolytes from the Chicago School are silent or any arguments they have are falling on deaf ears.  For the next decade now, governments are going to be involved in capital markets in a big way.



As a graduate of Chicago...I'm happy to say I told 'em so (Josh - 10/9/2008 10:28:13 AM)
I was the lone contrarian voice arguing Keynes, the commons and moral hazard while the rest of my cohorts were rushing over to take internships at Anderson Consulting and the Merc.

Friedman was wrong...suck it.

Modigilani/Miller (aka deficits don't matter) is also dead - RIP.

I owe bob lucas an email



Monetization won't probably happen either (Hugo Estrada - 10/9/2008 10:01:08 AM)
You raised a lot of good points, but the reality is that we may be seeing a depressed market for a while. Monetization of everything will raise the cost of living of everything, and most government will not risk turning so many people off. Look where we are at at this point: a massive crisis, and we can't honestly talk about how taxes must be raised.

The priorities will be to get the world economy going again. And unless there is a deux ex machina ready to save us, I don't know if it will happen.



Externalities must be internalized (Josh - 10/9/2008 10:38:51 AM)
Somehow the cost of that $5 t-shirt at Wal-Mart must be covered.  You don't pay it in the store. It's paid by the community around the fabrication plant that produces the synthetics.  It's paid by the textile workers who sacrifice their human rights for slave wages and in many cases actual slavery.  It's paid for by the store workers who don't get health insurance and especially the women who work and equal day without equal pay.

The truth of that $5 t-shirt at wal-mart is that everyone pays, except the producer, because it's their corporate mandate to maximize profits, all other concerns be damned.  Only government can introduce other concerns to the process, and government means - us.



I agree with you on the moral imperative (Hugo Estrada - 10/9/2008 11:16:08 AM)
Hey, I have only been in a Wal-Mart once in my life because I was taken to it on a visit to California for very similar reasons that you have given.

At the same time, there is a quirky psychological thing about prices: people are happier paying for that $5 t-shirt than if they had to pay the correct price. After all, so far they don't care about the working conditions, the slave wages, or the health insurance of workers. All what they want is their $5 t-shirt.

In a depressed economic environment, when people are pushed to having to need the $5 t-shirt, forcing them to pay $20 for it will be very, very unpopular.



yet high prices have lasting value (Josh - 10/9/2008 11:56:29 AM)
Why is there no place for wisdom in America?  There's room for religion, but not wisdom.  Only youth has value, because it is new.  

In the 50's America's leaders made an overt decision to create a world of disposable merchandise, wherein self-esteem, self-worth and even spiritual fulfillment were determined through consumption, in fact, through the purchase of new material objects.

Savings have now gone to zero in America, while debt, personal, national, trade, has gone through the roof.  All in pursuit of the disposable and the new.

yet, there is the same medicine at a higher price is often more effective.  Those who live within their means are often happier than even those who are the most well to do.  

Your point is obviously true, but I'd honestly like to grow old in a world that values wisdom, because that is a world that can endure.  



I want the same (Hugo Estrada - 10/9/2008 7:28:33 PM)
I want the world that you describe. We just got to wait until the conditions are good to be able to implement them.


"Corporate Feudalism" (Teddy - 10/9/2008 10:10:49 AM)
was what I have called the new order, but whatever it is called you have explained what's going on very well, and offered some pointed solutions.

Time is short because already the corporate former free-marketers like Paulson are laying the groundwork to control whatver "reforms" are produced. There is a trial balloon floating now that the United States Government will use some of the $700B rescue money to buy failing banks, thus completing the nationalization of the banks. They do not tell us what they will do with all the banks and bankshares the government will then own, but I ask you, who will end up actually owning whom in the long run?



what's the old saying? (Josh - 10/9/2008 10:40:05 AM)
when you owe a bank a thousand dollars the bank owns you, but when you owe a bank a billion dollars you own the bank.

something like that.



Expericne, tell us, Teddy, (Hugo Estrada - 10/9/2008 11:19:20 AM)
that the government will absorb the loses, bring them back up, and then the free market fundies will come out again asking for the de-nationalization of the banks, because, you know, the government can't run efficiently anything.

Then the government sell the banks at a deep discounts to the oligarchs of the nations.

And this scenario actually played out in Mexico from 1982 to the early 90s.



International capital (Teddy - 10/9/2008 10:18:06 AM)
cannot be controlled by national regulations because of the geographic limitations of national governments, which means that we must have international agreements among fractious national governments, which means that only a super power in full throttle can bring about such commonality of purpose (forget the United Nationas here). And that means that the longer we have Dubya at the helm, or a similar Republican, the less credibility the United States will have in leading the world into controls over capital---- and the less likely we are even to make such an anti-free market attempt. Another reason to vote Democratic.

Nevertheless, we must try: Pottery Barn rules: We broke it, we have to fix it.



That's the moral hazard (Josh - 10/9/2008 10:45:46 AM)
The recklessness and incompetence of the current Neocon president is ideologically intentional.  The purpose of Aristocrats is simply to be Aristocrats.  The only power that can stand in the way of Aristocratic hegemony is government.  Thus the ideology of Aristocrats (conservative republicans) requires the incompetence of government.  That's why the greatest success in the Bush Administration is failure, and why the greatest failure is success.  If a government program, like say social security or medicare, actually succeeds, it reinforces the power of government and props up the only force which can stand in the way of Aristocratic rule.  Brownie was actually doing a heckuva job, and Bush isn't a failure, he is the Aristocrat's greatest success.

And the pottery Barn Rule doesn't apply to Republicans - they break it, and we Democrats have to fix it.



And the (former?) middle class and the poor have to pay for it (Hugo Estrada - 10/9/2008 11:22:06 AM)


Interesting article (Ron1 - 10/9/2008 10:42:46 AM)
Very thought-provoking, Josh.

I tend to think things will be fine in the long run, but the next five to ten years might be rough.

All the current banks will need to be nationalized and recapitalized, and then all the CDSs will need to be wiped out in some manner to erase that bubble -- it's beyond ridiculous that on paper they account for more than the GDP of the entire world.

The government will have to ramp up spending on infrastructure and green energy development, but otherwise I think things in general will go on relatively unscathed.

I do agree with all the other commenters and you that it will be the job of governments going forward to address resource utilization in a much more stringent fashion, and hopefully get us off of a carbon-based economy. Healthier for everyone in the long run.