McCain's Forced Error

By: Josh
Published On: 9/2/2008 11:42:23 PM

Sara Palin is less likely to be VP than Harriet Miers is to ascend to the Supreme Court.  The Palin nomination is DOA.  Her nomination will go down as the singular event which destroyed the McCain candidacy.  That's not the full story, but that's how it will be remembered.  Here's why:

Virginia Democrats learned three powerful lessons from the Webb campaign in 2006:

1.  No Republican is invulnerable against a Democratic candidate of character ready to fight for a powerful vision of America.

Jim Webb ran on character and issues: foreign policy, economic fairness, government accountability.  He ran a forceful campaign against George Allen and defeated him.  

2.  Once pressured, Republicans buckle, and make forced errors which cause the overriding narratives of their public personae to unravel.

George Allen would never have exposed his dark side unless he had been pushed and pressured by the Webb camp for months before.  "Macacca" exposed Allen's true feelings to the "Real World of Virginia".  It cost him his Senate seat and it cost Republicans the Senate.

3.  It takes passion and powerful volunteer turnout to turn a candidate's advantages into election day victories.

In addition to the campaign's efforts and Senator Webb's enduring character, it took a pumped up "rag-tag army" of volunteers to make Webb's nail-biter victory a reality.

Democrats are bringing the lessons of 2006 to bear on 2008 .  Obama has forced the error and John McCain has provided his own "Macacca" moment:  the nomination of Sara Palin for VP.  Now it's time to get to work and win this thing.  
On Thursday, Barack Obama simultaneously united and invigorated the Democratic party with such force and power that it sent a shock deep into the McCain campaign.  So effective was Obama's speech and so well-orchestrated the convention that it drove John McCain to make a critical error that will lose him the White House.

Terrified and desperate, the McCain campaign took a wild risk and nominated the un-vetted right-wing extremist, Sara Palin for the number two slot.  In so doing, McCain fundamentally failed in his responsibilities as a major party candidate.  John McCain has proven himself fundamentally incapable of making critical decisions.  

This is not by accident.  It is by ideology.  Just as Bush is the fulfillment of conservatism's ideologically driven incompetence, so is McCain another Deadbeat conservative, short-changing America for political expediency.
John McCain did not vet his Vice Presidential pick, Sara Palin, and now the steady drip, drip, of Palin-related scandal has become a roaring river.  

Palin was director of indicted Senator Ted Stevens' 527 - There goes that "reformer" brand.

Palin lied about being against the "bridge to nowhere", and she Hired a lobbyist to get $27 Million in earmarks for Alaska. There goes that "honest public servant" brand.

Woops!  There goes that "America First Slogan", maybe "Alaska First", or "Caribou over Red White and Blue"?  Kinda catchy that...

Sara Palin: Dominionist Stalking Horse.  Yeah, these guys want to institute some crazed Christian Sharia, and put the world under a totalitarian regime until the rapture. It's not just crazy it's completely against scripture.

If you think the totalitarian thing is just hyperbole, consider that the only thing that stood between Palin and a good old fashioned book burning was a lone, principled librarian

Reckless John Disses America

She uses her power for vengeance against personal enemies. more.

She was almost recalled as mayor.

Sarah Sinking So Fast RNC Just Called Her "Sarah Pawlenty"

Palin's Church May Have Shaped Controversial World View

McCain Fought Teen Pregnancy Programs

Palin claims massive foreign policy credentials, that she doesn't have, because she basically has paid no attention to the most important foreign policy issue of our time, except to note that Iraq is a war for oil, oh and that we were sent there by God.

Can Sara Palin Give Blackwater's Mercenaries to Joel's Army?
(This is rather a stretch, but Palin is associated with Joel's Army, read this and try to remain calm.

At this point, Sara's failed business, and her husband's DUI seems completely inconsequential, indeed, prosaic.

Her friends think she's just wrong for the job.

And finally with regard to news reports of Palin's 17 year-old-daughter's pregnancy and impending shotgun wedding to a guy who is "proud to be a "f******ing redneck" (high school hockey is awesome!), two questions arise.  First, how could a woman be so ambitious that she would knowing of her daughter's condition, she would expose her to national and international scrutiny of this level.  Second, could there be a greater irony than the fact that that this anti-Roe candidate has produced a truly magnificent example of a true pro-Choice poster child.  Even though everyone in Alaska knew about it the McCain campaign didn't think to ask.

The media is asking whether Palin should leave the ticket and Intrade.com is taking bets.

There's more on the horizon...

Not only is the McCain Campaign stalling an investigation into whether Palin's used her power to get a public safety commissioner fired, it now turns out that Palin lied about traveling to Ireland.

The press is now asking whether Palin was vetted at all.  It clearly seems she wasn't.  All of this calls McCain's judgment into question, as it rightly should.

The truth is that this endless stream of Palin scandal is not the critical issue in this story.  The critical issue is that John McCain has proven and reinforced every assertion and attack made by the Obama campaign.  Just as Obama in Denver won the argument for the future of America, John McCain has lost the argument of who has the judgment to lead that future.  When so much depends on leadership, you don't shoot dice with the future of America.

Now it's time for us to get to work and bring this thing home.

When McCain announced the pick, it was viewed as a high-risk.  This in itself is an example of an epic failure of judgment, it completely disrespects the responsibilities of the presidency.  Even Karl Rove agreed that the Palin pick was a political and not a governing decision.  This was a simple play to achieve 2 political ends:

1.  Rally the extreme constituencies that made up the Bush electorate.  Palin as Bush in a Dress.
2.  Recruit the fringes of disgruntled(rapidly dwindling) Hillary supporters before they all settle in and support Obama.  Hillary + Ralf Reed = Palin.

In attempting to put lipstick on the pig of Republican betrayal of American principle of responsibility, McCain has yet again failed to live up to his responsibilities.    This is a cynical, desperate choice, that puts McCain's ideology front and center.  

To take a high risk with the critical constitutional responsibility is not leadership it is the same irresponsible failure that America has suffered these long 8 years.

With Palin's pick, John McCain's desperate, insulting, and demeaning campaign concedes that Obama has won the argument for the future of America, but they are determined to hold onto power. It will take a magnificent volunteer effort combined with the continued excellence of the Obama campaign itself to wrest power from these deadbeat Republicans and put a responsible leadership back in the White House.

Now, more than ever, McCain is more of the same.  By picking Sara Palin, McCain has empowered the anti-Hillary.  Hillary crusaded for critical issues like equal pay, universal health care, and reigning in the power of oil companies.  Sara Palin is no Hillary Clinton.  She is, in fact, pale in comparison to the greatness of HRC.  

Obama has done his part. He has won the argument and continues to lead by example.  

McCain has done his part. He has buckled to Limbaugh and produced a failure of epic proportions, so desperate to win that he has abandoned judgment, reason, and his moral compass.  

Now it is time for us to do our part. It's time to work tirelessly to win this election and send Barack Obama to the White House.


Comments



COMMENT HIDDEN (Indy4all - 9/3/2008 1:30:51 AM)


Completely untrue (Lowell - 9/3/2008 6:11:24 AM)
"lets get real about his victory. We have the "macacca moment" to thank for that victory, period. That single moment swayed conservative Democrats and independents over to Webb."

That's utterly ridiculous, contrary to all polling (and other) evidence, just plain wrong.  See here for the real "macaca" story.



Wrong (Josh - 9/3/2008 8:03:45 AM)
McCain provided this.  There is increasing evidence that McCain himself is alienating independents and especially women by running a desperate, insulting, despicable campaign.  The fact that he chose to gamble America's future on an unknown radical is causing a backlash.  

The McCain campaign's spin doctors can't play the victim enough to convince America that he's putting America first.  This is politics as usual from McCain.  more of the same.

Meanwhile, Obama remains above the fray.



Josh-just not seeing it (Indy4all - 9/3/2008 9:17:31 AM)
I have posted a few comments regarding what I am seeing and hearing from those conservatives both woman and independents and again that is all I can speak to. I only know that the canvass in my area conducted Saturday morning resulted in some really striking results given the area had a considerable turnout for Webb. I can also only speak to events and social gathering I myself have been involved in the last few weeks and especially over the Labor Day weekend. I can just tell you that "right now" the independents mind you very older in demographic are getting behind Mccain.

I will leave it to the experts to determine why. What I know is of the dozen or so folks I "know" voted Webb in 2006 are not voting Obama. I "know" a majority will support Warner as well. Theres a gap there that I have witness ed throughout the area here within different groups. Like a commented before, teachers like my wife are upset over the Palin attacks and the pereption of the anti-woman, stay at home, five kids rhetoric. I do not care who you are, Dem or Rep, that crap does not play well with any conservatives of either Party that are woman.

People can say its of no consequence and thats fair, but are not these Gallup polls like 2,800 people and we use it as a reflection of an entire population? Just saying.

My point has always simply been that these things do not help Obama in Virginia. Thats all. I say that because back during the Primary there was alot of enthusiam with folks I talked to and no can tell me that after that great speech at the Convention there should not be a helluva lot more than back during the Primary. I juts wonder if peoples psyches can take two great contests, first against Clinton and now the Republicans. Thats it.

I do not intend to speak for others; but when teachers are upset and say-and say is a big question I guess, they'll support a woman out of solidarity not "politics" and the very freinds and co-workers that voted for Webb are now saying they are not supporting Obama...."Houston We Have A Problem"

It may not in the context of RK be worth much other than a troll rating I guess, but I present them as "observations" nothing more.



Factual inaccuracy in this comment (aznew - 9/3/2008 8:10:51 AM)
I am not a big fan of DKos, but the statement that DKos has put out falsehood is patently untrue. A diarist of DKos apprently related rumors and allegations that have been floating around Alaska for a few months now.

It is simply inaccurate to attribute these comments to DKos. Diarists do not speak for the site.

And before you give me a long explanation about perceptions and how perceptions become truth whether they are accurate or not, I disagree. Truth does matter.



Exactly. (Lowell - 9/3/2008 8:25:07 AM)
I'm really getting tired of the slanders put out here about Daily Kos by one particular commenter.  I don't agree with stuff that's written on that blog in the user diaries, sometimes I really dislike certain diarists' tone or style, but the "front page" stuff is great, and a lot of the user diaries are excellent.  Also, the site is now getting 2.4 million visits per day, more than just about any newspaper in the country. That says a great deal right there.  Anyway, this anti-Daily Kos crap is simply a distraction from the real issue at hand:  John McCain's horrendous judgment in picking a completely unqualified person to be his running mate.  And besides "unqualified," we can add all the other issues about Palin:

*Social extremist on a wide variety of issues
*Supporter/sympathizer with a SECECESSIONIST party!
*Believes in teaching CREATIONISM (!!!) in schools
*Supported the "bridge to nowhere" and hired a lobbyist to scarf up millions of taxpayer dollars for Wasilla.
*Left Wasilla in bad fiscal shape, racking up nearly $20 million in long-term debt
*And then there's this
*And this.
*And much, much more.  What on earth was John McCain thinking?  Has this guy completely lost it?



I hope its not me (Indy4all - 9/3/2008 9:24:38 AM)
Lowell I hope its not me you are referring. I only posted one comment about the Daily Kos and that was based on a few people voicing there concern and over the references made on cable news about them.
I was informed this morning they were mentioned again as "cover" for the mainstream media or so it seems. I did not see it frankly, but sounds like throwing Kos under the bus.
In any case, my post was more a point towards the content than the site.
"putting out" was a reference made by Chris Mathews I think regarding the piece in question or "diary".


Really (Indy4all - 9/3/2008 8:59:29 AM)
The why was Daly Kos reported on all three networks as the source for the story that had the pundits scrambling for cover.
Remember perception is reality to most folks. And if you listen to radio at all yesterday, That is all you heard about. I am sure there his the claim to bias in the radio, but there the denial that these were falsehoods is BS.

I could care less who it is, if you can't call it down right BS its a sad day here in Virginia for all of us. You are seeking to capitalize on falsehoods "targeted" at a family solely for political motivation.

How would you feel if someday someone got so peeved at you and sought you out and your family and basically said you know I have enough money to smear you and your family and send people to bloggers work or harass those that worked with you or for you in an attempt to bring about some politcial end? News is one thing but that crap is crap.

I hope that day never comes to any of you.

I can only speak to what I know and feel. I can only speak about things I am seeing here and maybe because it has tradtionally been a more conservative area it skews it about as much as it does for folks who live in Arlington.

Perception is reality.

BTW James Webb was getting crushed by Geroge Allen if any of you were canvassing like I was in the 7th Congressional District, a highly Republican area, UNTIL the "MOMENT". Say what you want brought from one canvass to another we saw dramatic shift after the video moment was released and THEN picked up by televison. So what I am getting at. Its one thing for "real" news but everyoneknows the thing went viral and the canvass supports it.

Lowell makes no apologies for it and should not, but to deny outside NVA Webbs numbers were climbing in the areas that secured him his victory is absurd. Review the data form the polls in areas four years earlier, compare the turnout and then look at the results in previous Pro-conservative and Republican areas.

I know Rob over at Alter canvassed virtually every weekend for the whole summer in heavily Republican districts for Webb and has written many posts about the swing of independents down in Chesterfield in that election versus this one.

Truth does matter I think to most of us. Some truth is indeed an inconvenient truth I guess.

Diarist to Daily Kos is fair enough but it was the Kos not diarist it is being reported that provided MSNBC comment regarding the issue but folks at the Kos. We have seen these many times in the history of the blogosphere have we not?

I can recall someone recently trying to attribute info on RK to RK I think in a ad. I do not agree with that at all, but this is a feel a bit different. Whether you are a Democrat or a Repug I think we all can only look to ourselves and know if the results from such diaries is truly beneficial.

If all we want to do is win at all costs then I think we lose something greater in ourselves and communities and it is truly shameful if people cannot see that. If Daily Kos is the level of discourse we want to have, all be it the diarists, then we continue to travel down the wrong path. Sacrifice long term for the short term mentality I guess.

Aznew I respect you views on most topics, byt when the site (Daily Kos) and not the diarist is referenced on cable news it provides ample validity to my point. It was the Kos as an entity that was attributed with the backstory not a single individual or diarist. The run the risk and I guess alwasy have of simply being the politcial blogging version of the National Enquirer and thats fine but the media some have some deper standard of truth in labeling when they say that the Kos has just "released a story" like they are a legitimate news wire or something.

Like grandma always said, "that smells fishy" friends.



Why the media attributed the comment to Daily Kos (aznew - 9/3/2008 9:26:42 AM)
Three possible reasons.

First, the media had it wrong. Many reporters seem to simply not understand how blogs work.

Second, the media reports it that way because it fits neatly into their narrative of the Internet/bloggers as irresponsible and unturstworthy as a source of information

Third, the media is lazy, and are simply reprinting GOP talking points as if they were facts -- shocking, I know.

So, Indy, I don't just accept what I read in the media. Whatever the reason for this false report, it is a false report, as least with respect to sourcing.

Personally, I think the issue of how the public should vet Palin is a complicated matter. I feel bad for Palin's daughter, however, and her boyfriend. They are a pair of teenagers probably unequipped to deal with this problem in such a public way, and the pnly reason they are doing so is because Palin said "Yes" to McCain.

I'm not defending this behavior, but anyone who did not realize this is what would happen to these two young people has been living under a rock the last 12 years.



I really like Pat Buchanan's analysis.... (ub40fan - 9/3/2008 8:16:10 AM)
because it was unbiased. Buchanan recognizes the unique talents of Barrack Obama both in his speech writing and delivery which hundreds of thousands of people already know.... across the globe.

It is the reason Barrack Obama is where he is today .... the new leader of the Democratic Party and soon to be Leader of the Free World.

Like Indy4all I'm uncomfortable with all the Palin Pounding. Daily Kos has now become the "Angry Left" and has earned the censure of Obama himself regarding these "baby" matters. How ugly, untrue and counter-productive to assert that the youngest child was the daughter's already.

Yes babygate lends itself to a certain hypocrisy about "holier than thou" extreme Christian conservative "principals" .... but hey ... the daughter is living her own life and might be truly in love. Anyhow it's nothing worth making Gov Palin a martyr for.... and that's exactly where this whole thing is going because of GOSSIP BLOGS.

One final note. If John McCain had truly wanted to be a Maverick (aside from selecting Lieberman for VP) .... He should have reached out to select Ron Paul for Vice President.  Ron Paul is going to pull the Libertarian vote out of the Republican party, particularly in a few key Western states (Nevada) ensuring a Democratic Victory.

This more then anything may ensure a Democratic Victory (that extra-measure). Personally I think the Obama campaign has all the potential of "running the table" and winning in a Landslide. Just keep Barrack Obama out there .... uniting and inspiring a broad base.

Sarah Palin is just a side-show.



Sarah Palin may be a side show (Lowell - 9/3/2008 8:26:19 AM)
or a freak show or whatever, but John McCain's LACK OF JUDGMENT IN PICKING HER is certainly not a side show.


on my, I am really paranoid todey but maybe...... (pvogel - 9/3/2008 9:52:02 AM)
Maybe the Mccain folks, knowing 25 million racists needed "cover" to vote against Obama

They get "cover" with Palin.

this is how my twisted brain works some mornings.
I realize that Palin is just Mccains  bad judgement, but part of me  thinks its all the republicans bad judgement.



Polar Bears ... (Eric - 9/3/2008 12:17:31 PM)
That's a solid list of Palin's shortcomings, but I didn't see her anti polar bear position or that she doesn't believe the scientific community about global climate change.


You know... it's all just more of the same (Josh - 9/3/2008 2:19:41 PM)
This list of Palin outrages simply reinforces the fact that, just like Bush, McCain doesn't take his responsibilities seriously.  

We could keep listing all this stuff, and you should certainly feel free to.  Just beware the coming "sexism" backlash, and remember that this is about Obama vs. Bush and the Bush twins (McCain/Palin).  Obama has the judgment to lead.  He fulfills the American values of aspiration, empathy, and responsibility.  Meanwhile, Bush and the Bush Twins talk about values and fail every time to live up to them.  McCain's irresponsible choice is merely the current case in point, but it's incontrovertible and becoming clearer all the time..



Don't underestimate (Quizzical - 9/3/2008 1:32:04 PM)
Palin is trained as a journalist and worked as a sportscaster, and has a reputation for being an excellent speaker.  I expect her to read her speech (written by McCain's staff) from the teleprompter with brilliance tonight, to the general acclaim of the media.  She has some liabilities for the McCain campaign, but I don't see her nomination as being DOA by a long shot.


Vin Weber: "Lets' not play the experience game." (KathyinBlacksburg - 9/3/2008 2:38:25 PM)
He just said that on MSNBC less than five minutes ago.  Methinks they know they are in trouble.


PS (KathyinBlacksburg - 9/3/2008 2:38:55 PM)
Wasilla Town Hall--about the size of a convenience store.


A call for real expertise (Indy4all - 9/3/2008 3:12:36 PM)
I not be biggest beliver in pollsters. I have canvasses and know in my heart people lie to pollsters and I do not think that is very much of a surprise but I have been asking this basic question for since the Public Policy Polling tracking poll from Virginia cam out:

How is it that Mark Warner (D) is polling 70+% against Jim Gilmore (R)

and

Barack Obama (D) is polling only 47% over John McCain with the SAME respondents???????

No one here has taken up the question and provided this conservative with a real explaination as to how this dynamic is playing out in Virginia.

I would be interested to see the next PPP tracking now that Palin has been selected and am interested to see what that does to the numbers.

If anyone here at RK would like to educate me as to why this dynamic exists in the numbers I would be grateful.



Why also (Josh - 9/3/2008 3:30:14 PM)
Is George W. Bush polling at somewhere around 29% popularity and McCain polling at about 43%.  

John McCain has been the leading political celebrity of the Republican party for the last 16 years, and he's a military guy.  McCain's numbers are as good as they're going to get.  Mark Warner is well known and widely beloved by Virginians.  Obama is just now becoming known.

I'm interested in seeing where the polls are in a couple of weeks.  We'll see what we see.  How about this, if Obama/Biden is up outside the MOE 2 weeks from now, I'll buy you a beer.  If McCain/Palin, you buy me one.  If we're still floating, we'll re-bet for the next week.

Don't I owe somebody a beer from the Biden pick?



You already owe me a beer but... (Indy4all - 9/3/2008 4:50:54 PM)
if McCain/Palin are ahead in two weeks I think we may both need more than just a beer to make it.

I do think it could be interesting if Gimore gets it under 10pts, I don't think that is going to happen but if he does it would have to be solely attributed to the Sarah palin effect.

My gut tells me though they will be counting votes to the wee hours of the morning on the 5th.



Another explanation (Quizzical - 9/3/2008 3:52:48 PM)
It's Gilmore that is causing the discrepancy.  


That's definitely part of it. (Lowell - 9/3/2008 3:54:46 PM)
Gilmore's a complete loser.


In Virginia (Eric - 9/3/2008 4:02:20 PM)
Warner and Gilmore are well known former governors.  Gilmore almost drove Va into economic ruin while Warner pulled us back up to be one of the best managed states.  Warner is running a stellar campaign while Gilmore flails around.  Warner is firmly a centrist and Gilmore is an extremist.  People clearly understand the differences between Warner and Gilmore and are rewarding the candidate they see as more qualified and better represents their values.

There is much less familiarity with the Presidential candidates - we haven't had either leading (or misleading in Gilmore's case) our commonwealth for four years.  So the baseline would naturally revert to the D/R norm initially.  The fact that R's have carried Virginia for many Presidential contests running should be giving McCain a significant lead.  But it's not - meaning at least some of Obama's positives are beginning to move voters from their R norm.  Or that some of McCain's negatives are pushing them away.  Or both.

We'll see if somehow this Palin selection sticks.  But I suspect as more and more people get to know what she really stands for and has really done, and as Josh indicates, what it means about McCain making a big error, we'll see Obama's numbers solidify.  

Don't look for a Warner type stomping, but even in red Virginia we may well see Obama push past McCain as McCain's failure(s) pile up and Obama gets to really dig into campaigning after the Republcian Convention.



Excellent analysis. (Lowell - 9/3/2008 4:09:50 PM)
The other sad fact is that there are a lot of people out there who are racist to varying degrees.  Last I checked, Mark Warner was a white guy (as is Jim Gilmore).