While everyone is distracted with the family drama involving the Palins, it looks like another one of her supposed strong principles is quietly becoming more of an issue. Much like the stand she made against the bridge to nowhere - which was originally presented as a display of her leadership and stand against government waste. After mere days the facts have been floating to the surface that show that she was for it (provided the Federal government was going to pay for this huge waste) before she was against it (when she found out her state would have to pay).
Well, the Washington Post is pulling up another one. Ok, this isn't Deepthroat material, but it certainly adds a question mark to exactly how tough she is when it comes to dealing with public corruption. A few highlights...
Palin's name is listed on 2003 incorporation papers of the "Ted Stevens Excellence in Public Service, Inc.," a 527 group that could raise unlimited funds from corporate donors.Palin, an anti-corruption crusader in Alaska, had called on Stevens to be open about the issues behind the investigation. But she also held a joint news conference with him in July, before he was indicted, to make clear she had not abandoned him politically.
And the two filmed a campaign commercial together to highlight Stevens's endorsement of Palin during the 2006 race.
Shortly after Palin was announced as McCain's vice presidential pick, the ad was removed from her gubernatorial campaign web site.
And the Stevens/Palin ad in question (thanks to TPM)...
The Alaska Independence Party (AIP) is a fringe political organization which advocates dissolving the United States of America under various scenarios, such as "if any federal order attempts to make it unlawful for individual Americans to own firearms or to confiscate firearms."
Now, here's the AIP Vice Chairman on Sarah Palin:
Our current governor who I mentioned at the last conference, the one we were hoping would get elected, Sarah Palin, did get elected . . . .and there was a lot of talk about her moving up. She was an AIP member before she got the job as mayor...
Craaaazy. Of course, Palin also was a Pat "his speech sounded better in the original German" Buchanan* supporter as well, so what do you expect?
*h/t to Molly Ivins for the quote, referring to Buchanan's 1992 Republican convention "culture war" speech.
Again, it makes for great political theatre as long as Mccain/Palin actually lose. If they do happen to pull off the hail mary; then thats a different story I guess.
The campaign of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., likes to herald the independence of its new running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.Officials of the Alaskan Independence Party say that Palin was once so independent, she was once a member of their party, which, since the 1970s, has been pushing for a legal vote for Alaskans to decide whether or not residents of the 49th state can secede from the United States.
And while McCain's motto -- as seen in a new TV ad -- is "Country First," the AIP's motto is the exact opposite -- "Alaska First -- Alaska Always."
Whoops!!!
McCain making a hasty decision? Say it aint so!
My prediction: after McCain is forced to drop Palin, McCain will simply not choose anyone and promise to pick someone between Nov4 and Jan 20 should he be elected. That really simplifies all these VP selection problems.
Even Buchanan had to agree with that one.
Again, the most qualified on "paper" is Gov. Bill Richardson but you have to admire those that make the arguement that Obama is.
It certainly goes a long way AZNEW but alot of these folks are the same ones that discounted Mitt Romney in the GOP Primary for his Olympic experience as not credible. So I wonder how far the campaign running will really get in the mainstream.
Look its never been about Obama's resume. Thats not what gets 200K people (okay the free beer helped) in Germany or 85k in Denver to come out. I think we all can relate to some really successful business folks with big time resumes; how about Jobs,Buffet,Gates and the like but they do not exactly "inspire" us much but they are very intelligent and successful at managing different paradigms.
Obama transcends these typical normal political parameters.
The problem is that she can perform well at the debate without knowing a lot of substance, and create the illusion that she is capable for many voters. The debate will not get into the depth of knowledge that is so critical for a CIC to be able to evaluate the advice they hear and reach good decisions.
Perhaps a few encounters with the press, if they ask her tough, specific questions, will demonstrate whether she knows what is going on. I doubt she does. Apparently, the McCain campaign will not let any reporters interview her.
Also, I saw CampbellBrown on CNN destroy McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds an hour or so ago on CNN over the issue of Palin's experience. I mean, Campbell Brown? She is about as non-confrontational as it gets. Her job, in fact, is just to ask inane questions and them let politicians and surrogates spin for 30 seconds.
Apparently, she needed to question Bounds a little tougher to keep some of her dignity.
That is, if her candidacy survives this week. It has been a very, very bad day for Sarah Palin and family, and for the McCain campaign.
Are we yet in McGovern/Eagleton territory?