General Assembly Priority 1: Gay Marriage.

By: Kenton
Published On: 1/11/2006 2:00:00 AM

Unsurprisingly, the first day of the General Assembly session was met with the anti-gay marriage amendment being referred out of committee 18-4, with four Democrats siding with 14 Republicans against equality in marriage.

Shows where priorities lie. It seems unfortunate that one of the first acts of this year's session is to add to our state's bill of rights an amendment restricting the rights of gays. Tsk tsk. I'm still waiting for someone to point out to me when a gay couple came in and corrupted their children. I'm waiting.

Virginia's General Assembly is seemingly very, very eager to stop equality.


Comments



Sam: Why should gov (Lowell - 4/4/2006 11:31:15 PM)
Sam:  Why should government favor one group of people over another in taxes, inheritance, legal rights, etc?  Currently, married couples benefit from a panoply of such benefits, which means that outlawing "marriage" for an entire class of people restricts their rights.  This seems very clear to me.


TURKEY BASTER BOB? (PM - 4/4/2006 11:31:15 PM)
TURKEY BASTER BOB?  Love the nickname . . .

Backdoor bigotry, single moms and tequila
  The Virginian-Pilot
© January 12, 2006

Until this week, I had no idea that single women who desperately want children and go to clinics for help were such a menace to the commonwealth.

But I’m getting more REM sleep now that I know Del. Robert Marshall, Republican from Manassas, is on the case.

As lawmakers return to Richmond this week, a firehose of questionable legislation has spewed into the General Assembly. One of the wettest bills is Marshall’s.

See the complete Pilot, exactly as in print
- View stories, photos and ads
- E-mail clippings
- Print copies
Log in or learn more

Email this Page
Print this Page
Get Email Newsletters

Turkey Baster Bob wants to forbid medical professionals, like those at EVMS’ Jones Institute, from performing artificial insemination or in-vitro fertilization on unmarried women.

Marshall, you may remember, boasts an unsurpassed zeal for government meddling in private lives.

His invocations of “family values” make Pat Robertson look like a wuss. He’s set in his sights colleges that distribute morning-after pills, and crusaded to keep newscaster Hugh Finn on life support over his wife’s objections.

So it’s no great surprise that he’s determined to keep Virginians safe from the scourge of single mothers.

Or is that really single women with female partners?

You see, many lesbians conceive with the help of artificial insemination. And while Marshall’s bill, HB187, specifies only “unmarried women,” his previous anti-gay rants make it reasonable to conclude that they’re in his cross hairs yet again.

If Bob can’t stamp out homosexuals, then by gum, he’s going to make darned sure they don’t procreate.

Never mind the anti-family collateral damage.

That includes widows of soldiers killed in Iraq, who froze their husbands’ sperm just in case they didn’t come home. Or spouses of patients who succumbed to cancer, who did the same before undergoing chemotherapy. Or a newly widowed woman with a series of frozen embryos and no doctor to implant them.

Widows, after all, are single women, too.

Look, if unmarried gals who are determined to get pregnant can’t go to clinics, they’ll get the job done the old-fashioned way: a bar, some tequila and a randy guy with good genes.

In other words, Marshall’s bill, if passed, could encourage women to pick up strangers in bars and have unprotected sex in order to conceive. Not exactly family values.

Maybe he should outlaw Jose Cuervo and Barry White while he’s at it.

On the off chance that Marshall is truly targeting single motherhood, not just homosexuality, he should introduce a bill outlawing divorce, and a companion piece mandating IUDs for all females over 12.

Sure, studies show children are better off raised by two parents. They’re also better off eating all their veggies and being born to adults in higher income brackets.

But it’s not Richmond’s place to dictate which Virginians can give birth, lest the government start issuing IQ quizzes, Myers-Briggs tests and bank balance questionnaires, and return to the bad old days of forced sterilization.

On a whim, I called Eastern Virginia Medical School to see how the Jones Institute’s business might be affected if this bill becomes law. I was told they don’t even keep track of whether patients are married or single. Nor do they care.

After all, they’re in the business of medical engineering — not social engineering.

If Marshall’s GOP colleagues — who tend to roll their eyes at his legislation and then vote for it anyway — give this a nod, they should be booted from the party of Goldwater and Reagan.

What happens when a woman’s feet are in the stirrups is none of Marshall’s, or the government’s, business.

Bronwyn Lance Chester is an editorial writer for The Virginian-Pilot. Reach her at 757-446-2307 or e-mail her at bronwyn.chester@pilotonline.com



I'm confused, the De (Steve Nelson - 4/4/2006 11:31:15 PM)
I'm confused, the Democrats voted *against* equality in marriage? So that means they voted against gay marriage?

I don't even know who to be mad at now! YAR!