McClellan: White House Incompetent (Except Bush & Me)

By: TheGreenMiles
Published On: 5/27/2008 11:57:26 PM

When he worked for President Bush, there was no bigger peddler of lies and propaganda than Scott McClellan. But now that he wants you to pay $27.95 for his new book, the former White House press secretary is ready to tell it like it is. Iraq was a mistake! Katrina was botched! The media is too complacent!

In case you've forgotten what an obtuse lapdog McClellan was, here's Jay Rosen back in 2006:

McClellan’s specialty was non-communication; what’s remarkable about him as a choice for press secretary is that he had no special talent for explaining Bush’s policies to the world. In fact, he usually made things less clear by talking about them.
Of course, McClellan absolves two people of blame -- himself and President Bush. Of his own role in the consensus Worst Presidency Ever, he writes, "Although the things I said then were sincere, I have since come to realize that some of them were badly misguided." Translation: It wasn't my fault! Those mean men tricked me! I was a victim of circumstance!

And like all White House staffers, current and former, McClellan maintains his massive man-crush on Dubya. "I still like and admire President Bush," he gushes, repeatedly painting Bush as merely the hapless victim of devious advisers.



Comments



I smell a rat... (snolan - 5/28/2008 10:48:17 AM)
All of the points he makes are things we already knew...

Yet he did nothing about them when it would have made a difference?

Something very fishy is going on.



There's a Special Place in Hell (The Grey Havens - 5/28/2008 1:03:51 PM)
Reserved for this toad.

I hope he has a nice life, because the next is really going to suck.  



CYA? (Rebecca - 5/28/2008 6:04:56 PM)
I suppose he can say he wasn't involved if he tells the truth now. Doesn't make much sense to me, but it may shift the blame.

If I rob a bank and then voluntarily confess will they let me off?



I caught some commentary on Hardball (aznew - 5/28/2008 7:57:05 PM)
to the effect that McClellan feels like Rove, Cheney, et al. abused him and destroyed his credibility by letting him (or requiring that he) "lie" to the press, and that this is payback.

Maybe -- I don't know. But I suspect that once the memoirs of these years come pouring forth, there is going to be some interesting stuff -- some of it CYA, and some of Bush loyalists trying to shape history by putting off the blame for virtually every miscalculation and screw-up on someone else.

And some of it just good old-fashioned score settling against these bullies.  



Discredit the canary (Teddy - 5/28/2008 9:21:45 PM)
So McClellan is singing now (but not, of course, the complete song, revealing Everything). The natural sequence of events will now see the Bushies asassinating Scott's character. Already I have heard "this doesn't sound like Scott. He's terribly distraught," "he has a serious character flaw, so spiteful, blaming everyone but himself," and "the President has been told, but he has better things to do than worry about this" (translation: so the rest of his loyalists will have to do the dirty work of destroying the credibility of this traitor). With the many examples of similar personal destruction before him, like Wilson, Clarke, Plame, etc, I assume McClelland knew what his fate would be. In that vein, maybe he did not go far enough because he still portrayed Bush with adulation--- a mistake, since Bush will feel no gratitude at being protected, but will seek to have McClellan destroyed anyway, while still pretending to be above the dirty work.  


McClellan has a concience after all (relawson - 5/29/2008 12:05:17 AM)
McClellan parroted the lies of the Bush administration and until now I had no idea that he believed he was a paid liar.

I have mixed feelings about this.  Thank God an insider is finally speaking publicly about just how inept this administration is.  Hopefully the history books cite this book.  It is important that the flaws of this administration are documented as historical fact SO THAT THIS IS NEVER REPEATED.  The Bush Administration should be a case study on what not to do.  It would be a crime if Bush doesn't face criminal charges.

That said, I don't think McClellan has atoned for his role in this administration.  He peddled the lies and did so quite willingly.  He wasn't duped, he was complicit.



Comlicit also were the media (Teddy - 5/29/2008 9:29:41 AM)
who hastened to peddle the Bush-Rove lies, never asked serious questions or even follow-up questions, and mocked and disparaged any "reporter" who dared to raise the slightest question about what was going on. McClellan could not have done what he did for as long as he did without the help of the White House press corps. This shared guilt should not go unremarked.


What I find even more discusting (relawson - 5/29/2008 11:38:46 AM)
Is that many members of the media are DEFENDING their coverage.

I mean hello, if your network has a countdown to war with a ticker running 24-7, you are supporting the war.  It became a form of entertainment.  They wanted it to happen.

Of course they didn't want to question the war.  They wanted their moment of glory and to have cameras rolling on the front lines.  From the moment the first bombs were dropped, it was an entertainment event, which resulted in the loss of hundreds of thousands of lives.

I think we should spend as much effort attacking at denouncing these so-called journalists for their role in dixie chicking and donahue-ing anyone who got in their way, as we do attacking the Bush administration.  

I now understand how German citizens came to support Hitler.  I'm sure that Hitler had his own misinformation campaign and a complicit media.  I'm not comparing Bush to Hitler, but I am comparing how both regimes were able to fool the masses and the end results were unfortunate.

If we had an educated public and a media that isn't a puppet of corporations or the government, we wouldn't be in this situation today.