Hager vs. Frederick vs. Howell vs. Frederick vs...

By: Lowell
Published On: 5/12/2008 4:42:12 PM

Wow, the race for RPV chairman is getting rough.  In response to these leaked documents, Del. Jeff Frederick's wife Amy wrote the following:

FROM THE DESK OF
Amy N. Frederick

An Open Letter To William Howell, Speaker Of The Virginia House Of Delegates

Dear Mr. Speaker:

I received your letter this morning. To say that I was shocked would be an understatement.

It takes some nerve for you to write me to outline all the reasons my husband should not be Chairman of the Republican Party of Virginia (RPV). Worse, your letter to me was apparently timed to arrive the same day RPV (the organization our opponent currently oversees) leaked misleading documents intended to attack Jeff's integrity.

Can you imagine your reaction if Jeff sent a letter to your wife Cessie telling her -- in light of the House Republican Caucus losing 11 seats to the Democrats since you've become Speaker -- that you should not be Speaker any more? That the House GOP has gone from a very healthy governing majority to now a slim 3 seat majority under your leadership and therefore you're not best qualified to be Speaker?

Then, on the same day after such a letter, you were attacked for standing on the podium at the 1993 Virginia Republican Convention to ask Republicans to defeat a pro-life nominee for Lt. Governor with a pro-choice alternative?

I believe you'd demand an apology from Jeff immediately -- and while I can't demand anything, I do believe you owe me an apology.


I realize Jeff is a young go-getter, and that rubs the old guard the wrong way. Yet, just because you've known Jeff's opponent for over 20 years, as you stated in your letter, doesn't excuse this sort of conduct.

I do find one of your statements rather curious:

"As the Speaker of the House of Delegates, I've stood firm for our conservative values and John Hager has stood with me. I've known John Hager for two decades, and I've always been able to count on him."

Was it the time you were advocating the Party go with a pro-choice statewide candidate over a pro-life leader, or more recently when John Hager was working to advance the agenda of Democratic Governor Mark Warner, that you were counting on him?

True, Jeff was too young to vote two decades ago when you started working with John, but is the old guard really getting things done?

Republicans came to power on the backs of conservative, grassroots activists, and Jeff is a young leader who has shown he can motivate young voters to join those who have spent years doing the volunteer work necessary to elect conservatives.

Jeff is not going to march more in line with the establishment to earn their support; no thanks. It is amazing to me that the old guard has betrayed grassroots conservatives on so many issues, yet still feels it can dictate to the grassroots who they need to select as their Party leaders.

As you recall, John Hager lost his 1992 bid for RPV Chairman running as a moderate. Then the Party was able to get back to its conservative principles on life, taxes and the 2nd Amendment and the result was us winning control of both houses of the General Assembly and sweeping all statewide offices.

On May 31, I believe the Republicans who attend the convention will vote to get back to winning elections and governing as conservatives -- and will defy you and the rest of the old guard to elect Jeff Frederick as RPV Chairman.
Sincerely,
Amy Frederick

P.S. Please take "Mrs. Amy Frederick" out of your contacts, and please don't send me anything further in the future about my husband.

You know, I'm tempted to just say, "ah, the sweet sound of Republican infighting!"  Heck, why not? :)


Comments



wow (Carrington - 5/12/2008 6:50:41 PM)
That's an extremely interesting judgment call on Frederick's part.  No way to make friends (or good committees), for sure..he must be all-in on a changing of the guard in the short term...


Old Guard vs return to conservatives principles? (Teddy - 5/12/2008 7:30:43 PM)
While I certainly must admit I admire Amy Frederick's straightforward, incisive prose, I ended up a bit confused: she is blaming Speaker Howell because he suggested a pro-choice (or, at any rate, soft on pro-life) candidate over a hardline right-to-lifer; according to her, Jeff Frederick represents the young go-getter who will return to basic conservative principles? Did I get that right? In other words, in lala republican land, the rebellious young are more not less rigid than the Old Guard? They believe the republicans lost elections because they were not conservative enough? It is the intention of the rebellious young to be more old fogey than the old fogeys themselves?

Great! Let them take the republican party even further out of the mainstream, off into such extremism that most Americans will recognize that the republicans are nutty fringe cases, and vote Democratic... even in Virginia.  



Teddy you are correct in your assessment (citizenindy - 5/14/2008 9:43:08 AM)
Its part of the reason why I became an independent