Give What You Can to Victims of the Myanmar Cyclone

By: TheGreenMiles
Published On: 5/9/2008 1:02:13 PM

The military leaders of Myanmar continue to stall efforts to deliver help to victims of last week's cyclone. But it's important to do what we can now to make sure aid organizations have the funding to get aid into the disaster zone as soon as political barriers are lifted:

Another 4 inches of rain was forecast to fall next week as more than 1 million people waited for food, clean water, shelter and medicine to reach them. Diplomats and aid groups warned number of dead could eventually exceed 100,000 because of illnesses and said thousands of children may have been orphaned.

Please give what you can to the American Red Cross or the aid organization of your choice.



Comments



I agree that people should give, but... (Lowell - 5/9/2008 1:41:15 PM)
...I also think that the UN Security Council needs to force the dictators in Myanmar to open their borders to relief supplies immediately.  Essentially, the rulers of Myanmar are committing genocide by allowing tens of thousands of people to die when they COULD BE SAVED.  Next stop for the rulers of Myanmar: The Hague.


I agree (Silence Dogood - 5/9/2008 5:20:32 PM)
I have the deepest sympathies for the people influenced by this tragedy and will gladly give what I can as soon as I know that any relief aid I give won't be confiscated by the dictatorial regime in control of that government, as happened with the aid sent by the United Nations.


Don't confuse the UN with the Red Cross (TheGreenMiles - 5/9/2008 5:34:00 PM)
From the Red Cross website:
The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies has successfully shipped shelter kits, made up of tarps, ropes and hammers, and jerry cans for storing clean water to the Myanmar Red Cross, who is partnering with UNICEF to distribute to the hardest hit areas of the coastal delta region.

The American Red Cross and International Federation will continue to tap into their pre-stocked emergency supplies - such as tarps, hygiene kits and insecticide-treated bed nets - located in warehouses in Kuala Lumpur and Dubai as requested.



I'll make a donation (relawson - 5/9/2008 7:40:02 PM)
I'll donate bullets to anyone willing to dispose of dictators in that government.

After their crackdown on the Budhist monks and now their refusal of aid to hundreds of thousands of people who face certain death, I have no qualms with executing every last general and dictator in that government.  

This is where we should be sending our military, not places like Iraq.  The same goes for Darfur.  Our priorities are all wrong.  

There are evil people in this world who most certainly deserve to be on the business end of a guided missile.



I think it's time to get on the phone (Lowell - 5/9/2008 10:14:37 PM)
with the Chinese.  Say to them, "People are dying every minute that goes by, this is intolerable. You tell your Burmese allies that they've got 12 hours; either they let in U.S. helicopters, airplanes, etc. with relief supplies or we're coming in WITHOUT their permission. And tell them not to try any crap either, because we will kick their sorry asses and make sure they stand trial for crimes against humanity."


Hopefully Obama (relawson - 5/9/2008 11:34:10 PM)
Will set our military priorities straight.  We can use our military for good.  We can help people - like those in Darfur and those in Myanmar.

Instead we are fighting permanent and useless wars for BS reasons.  I would like to see us lower ranks in the army and create a new - and large - peace keeping force that does the work the UN doesn't have the courage to do.  Basicly another branch of the military.  I would combine the Marines with the Navy and reduce their forces.  They are already under the same chain of command - I would simply more tightly integrate them.

That would leave us with a smaller army, a combined Navy/Marine Corp, and Air Force.  Plus a new substantial peace keeping force, absorbing marines and soldiers who would be retrained for peace keeping and disaster response.

Peace keeping forces need to be trained differently because armies are designed to kill.  Peace keepers are designed to keep order or respond to disaster - and killing is a last resort, not first resort.

If I were running the show, that's what I'd do. ;-)



I agree it's time to get on the phone (oldsoldier - 5/10/2008 11:43:02 AM)
with the Chinese, but I'd say to them "Are you going to do a relief operation or do you want us to do it?"

I'd be really reluctant to threaten ass-kicking because about all we have left is air and naval power and those boys cause way more collateral damage than ground troops and the Burmese generals have moved their facilities into the civilian population since our Iraq invasion.

   



Well, we'd better do something fast (Lowell - 5/10/2008 11:52:53 AM)
because people are dying by the minute.  This reminds me of Rwanda, except this time the government is killing people by preventing relief supplies from reaching them, not by hacking them to death.


You're absolutely right, except for (oldsoldier - 5/10/2008 2:03:26 PM)
Why WE?  Today's Wall Street Journal wants the security council to suspend or expel Burma (I can't spell or pronounce the other)and the UN is the one getting pee'd on right now.

I feel other nations need to step up and take the lead to give us a break from being the world's combination policeman and disaster insurance payer.

To me, it's like when I'm hit up for donations by kids at store entrances supporting one worthy cause or another, and I have to walk by them because I give what I can afford to give to church and about 4 or 5 charities I chose carefully.  I simply cannot afford to give to 90 or 100+ worthy causes, and I think WE as a country should use whatever political pull Dubya has left in the UN to get the UN to assemble a force to protect and demand its aid be permitted to be delivered directly to the people and not some military depots of the Burmese government.

As a member of the UN, this is our duty.  If the UN fails to act with our encouragement and support, then there is no longer any reason for a UN. It failed Rwanda, how about Darfur and a whole bunch of tiny atrocities all over the globe?  



Well, when I say "we" (Lowell - 5/10/2008 2:07:48 PM)
I mean whichever countries have sufficient capability to do something about the situation.  Of course, I'm an American, so I'm focused on my own country.


DoD HA/DR (South County - 5/10/2008 8:34:39 AM)
DoD has extensive Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HA/DR) capabilities, in support of USAID's OFDA, the lead USG entity for disaster relief.  Recent examples include the extensive U.S. HA/DR response to the tsunami in Indonesia and the earthquake in Pakistan.  In the wake of the cyclone, U.S. Pacific Command initiated a Joint Task Force led by the Marines to lead the effort.  We have helicopters in Thailand waiting to help, cargo planes at the ready, and 4-5 ships offshore.  The only thing we need is permission to help out.  Yesterday, after the situation really started getting worse with a second wave of dispair caused by an inadequate response to the initial tragedy (people suffering a lack of food, water, and medicine), the junta finally agreed to let one U.S. Cargo plane in next Monday.  Apparently the Chinese may have talked to the ruling miitary faction to force the issue.  But so much more could be done.  Unfortunately, a lot of people will suffer due to politics and the inept response by the generals in charge.