Hillary Clinton: Bully

By: DanG
Published On: 2/17/2008 5:42:23 PM

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/t...

An interesting read from somebody outside of the states.  Hillary is starting to get more and more aggressive against Barack Obama.  Is this the right move?  Or is it destined to backfire?  You decide.


Comments



None of the above . . . (JPTERP - 2/17/2008 7:09:54 PM)
I'd just say she's being unpersuasive.

A doer, not a talker?

I mean come on.  What exactly is it that she's done in elected political office?

In two short years Obama has done more substantive policy work in the Senate than she did in her previous 6.  



Not A Bully (Lee Diamond - 2/17/2008 10:58:49 PM)
This is a political campaign.  I don't think terms like bully are particularly relevant.  Senator Obama and his campaign seem plenty capable to me.

I don't like some of the antics that have been coming from Clinton & Co., but the fact is we are beating them.  Lets get it done.



Most of Europe (TMSKI - 2/17/2008 11:11:04 PM)
.... favors Obama.

The U.K. polls favor Hillary ...  bully is their term.



Not about Bullying (Hugo Estrada - 2/18/2008 12:43:49 PM)
The story is interesting though. It is more about in what poor shape the Hillary campaign is in.


I am getting terribly fatigued by this race. (thegools - 2/19/2008 1:37:57 AM)
What is really tiring is the partisan/biased attacks against supporters of Obama against Hillary, and vise versa.  ....except I hear very little of the vice versa.  I guess it exists but I really haven't heard much about it....but then I tend to read Raising Kaine, and Daily Kos.

  If Obama had never run for president and Hillary were the nominee, would we be hearing people sing her praises here?  

 Hillary Clinton is not Harris Miller, but sometimes it seems like she gets the same treatment.  That said I am not commited to Hillary or Obama.  I am one of the true undecides/Edwards supporters, & I don't have a horse in this race.

 Still all the attacks are terribly fatiguing.