As many of you know, my top choice for the Democratic nomination during most of 2007 was, by far and away, Al Gore. It's not just because of his Nobel Peace Prize winning work on global climate change. If anything, I was even more impressed by Gore's heroic speech on the "constitutional crisis" facing our nation, as well as his counterattack against the Bush/right-wing "Assault on Reason." Finally, I felt that Gore was -- as the saying goes -- "tanned, rested and ready" to avenge the 2000 election fiasco, in which he won the popular vote by over 500,000 but somehow didn't become president.
Unfortunately, Al Gore didn't run. On the bright side, however, Gore's decision not to seek the nomination helped open the door to the emergence of a man now being compared favorably to the best of what John and Robert Kennedy had to offer. That man, of course, is Barack Obama, the great hope for pulling our nation together after the dark, destructive, divisive Bush years.
It's now time for Al Gore to endorse Barack Obama. Andrew Sullivan quotes David Roberts of Gristmill:
Enter Al Gore. If he has a chance to make an influential endorsement, possibly even to nudge Obama to victory, does he have the willpower to refrain? I don't see how. It would be such sweet balance to his botched endorsement of Howard Dean in '04. Like Ted Kennedy, Gore would become a huge fish in the comparatively small(er) pond of Obama's powerful backers. He would enter 2009 with the full power of an historic new presidency at his back. Imagine what could be done with that power. Gore as climate envoy? Climate czar? Climate secretary?In that event, Gore would have achieved a balance between the conflicting demands of his conscience. He would have the freedom to be a focused advocate and change public opinion, alongside the power of government to affect real change. Best of all, he could get there without the inanities and indignities of a political campaign.
If the Dem. primary reaches the point where Gore could become kingmaker, I suspect the temptation will be irresistible.
Let's hope the temptation IS irresistible for Al Gore. As Andrew Sullivan writes:
Michael Crowley thinks that Gore could deliver a "death blow" of sorts to the Clinton campaign. C'mon, Al. Just do it.
And please, Mr. Vice President, "just do it" now.
Just to make it fun, I predict that Gore will give his endorsement on Friday at noon EST.
Note: I'm not trying to say that Gore was the primary reason Dean lost.
"Well, Obama was riding high with Ted Kennedy's endorsement. Then Gore came along and set him back."
Leaving aside the merits, I don't see how Gore hurts himself by waiting until after Super Tuesday, possibly after Virginia.
I would also add, if Hillary's not defeated in the coming weeks, the party will need a credible peacemaker at some point in the future. I'd rather see Gore, a Nobel Peace Prize winner, save himself for that role.
I don't see why Gore would endorse unless he agrees with the candidate's policy. And that goes for all of them.
I'm not expecting an endorsement. And if the Obama Campaign is wise, they won't either. They'll campaign with what they have NOW.
Al Gore will either endorse Obama, or not endorse at all. And I think he's heavily leaning towards not endorsing at all.
It may hurt him, however, in the GE, to have Kennedy's strong support in the primary.
Gore doesn't know who is going to win this race and he doesn't want to risk having a nominee with a grudge against him that prevents his ideas and agenda from getting anywhere.
Yeah, I wish he would endorse Obama. I just don't think that it would be in Al Gore's best interest.
Gore doesn't have to posture for anybody. He's not playing a power game. He already has all the influence he needs to get his message across. If he endorses, if won't be because somebody may give him a job in the administration. It's because he wants that person to be President.
Al Gore is a sincerely nice person with a wife whom he loves and a life outside of politics that's working just fine for him. Maybe he does feel passionately for one candidate over another. I don't know. But he's gotten to the point where he has everything he needs and doesn't need to feel any more popular or powerful than he already is--otherwise HE would be running--and I think we should respect him for that. If Al doesn't feel the need to remind you how big his nuts are by striking a "death blow" to someone else's campaign.
"How about to save the country?" For Pete's sake, save the cheerleader, save the world....
There is a long time between the end of primaries and the Convention. That is a long time for "buyer's remorse" to set in.
By the time August rolls around, we could be begging for an outsider to come and save the day. I for one would be all for it.
If Gore were the nominee. I would be fine with and Edwards or Obama VP. Obama as VP would get him much needed experience. Edwards as VP would set him up for Presdient down the road, or he could be on the cabinet as AG, of Sec,. of ??
Everyone is happy and we get the president many of us wanted from the get-go. It's a Win/Win
But, yes, there is a lot of time between now and then, and anything could conceivably happen.
Back in the day, when Conventions really were brokered, that's how Lincoln would up with the GOP nomination in 1860. The three frontrunners -- Stanton, Chase and Bates -- could not agree, and gave Lincoln's supporters an opening.
Red state/purple state governors and senators on the one hand -- Caroline Kennedy and Ted Kennedy on the other combined with Sen. Leahy, Kerry, McCaskill, et al.
The main thing at this point seems to be money, and organization.