In Defense of the American Dream: John Edwards 2008

By: Kenton
Published On: 1/10/2008 12:55:07 PM

I've come back from my brief stay in New Hampshire working for John Edwards, and in this frigid state I rediscovered why I was a Democrat. Read on to see why I'm sticking with my candidate.

JohnEdwards.com

"Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope." -Robert F. Kennedy

The New Hampshire primary was over, and the scene at Manchester-Boston Regional Airport the next day resembled a modern-day Exodus. Hundreds of battle-weary volunteers and workers for every candidate sat waiting for their flights home, or to another primary state. Tattered stickers from one last GOTV canvass clung to jackets, buttons pinned to lapels in one last show of support. Bouyant Clinton supporters waited near giggly students for Obama, unfazed by second place. A lone Richardson supporter folded up a yard sign to take home. I had some time to reflect on why I had even come to this frigid state for a  candidate that got third place.
I came because it is my hope that the American Dream will never die. The American Dream that attracted millions to our shores, millions who braved rough seas and war at home, the American Dream that brought my parents here. I came because I believed John Edwards embodied the spirit of the American Dream, and of the Democratic Party that once stood up and defended it. The American Dream--that all would have their voice be heard. The American Dream--that all would have the same chance that Senator Edwards had to rise from the bottom with enough hard work. These were the values staunchly defended by the great liberals of the past--and I am not afraid to say liberal--which we have immortalized in the initials we call them by.

Liberals fought for the voiceless. RFK stood side-by-side with Martin Luther King as the segregationists marched, RFK sent the US Marshals to force integration in schools. He went to South Africa in the age of apartheid when no one else dared and called for its end. Liberals understood the true moral responsibility of government, to protect the less fortunate in life. In America, the richest nation in the world, millions go hungry, without health care, homeless, ignored and in the shadows. The Democratic Party once fought for them.

FDR realigned the economy with his New Deal. Before, the top 10% of America earned nearly 50% of the income, after, the percentage fell to 30%. Millions shared in the middle-class prosperity that dominated. Today, the top 10% once again earns nearly 50%, something seen in the Gilded Age, an economic injustice that I will not stand for. The New Deal brought us Social Security, in the belief that no one in the twilight of their life should be left abandoned.  LBJ renewed the commitment of government against poverty with Medicaid and Medicare, in the belief that no one in the shadows of life should be abandoned. The Democratic Party is to fight for those who cannot fight for themselves.

Today, the voiceless are quashed and the economic justice which attracted so many is under attack. Our Constitution lies in tatters as blood lies on American hands in the form of renegade contractors and neverending wars. Americans are wiretapped, the corpse of habeas corpus lies forgotten at the altar of fear. We once fought for the freedom from fear, now we capitulate to terror and shed our liberties. Meanwhile, the middle class is under attack. Health care costs skyrocket as the cost of the education needed to stay prosperous spirals out of control. The progressive tax system which forged opportunity for every American is being chipped away at.

I chose Johnny Reid Edwards because he was the only candidate with a cohesive plan to restore the promise of a progressive America. To not only restore and renew the legacies of the Democrats past by saving Social Security, the progressive tax system, and our commitment to social justice, but carrying the torch by ending poverty in America and giving every American the right to health care. America is at a crossroads, one that America has been at before. Will the Democratic Party stand and fight, like FDR, RFK, and LBJ did, or will the Democratic Party acquiesce to the notion of "centrism"?

I am a product of the progressive legacies of Democrats past, a middle-class American whose parents fled oppressive regimes to chase the American Dream, but there are millions less fortunate. In the richest, most powerful nation on earth, millions go hungry, millions go without health care, veterans sleep homeless. I met an airline pilot making phone calls for JRE next to me because he had been forced out of his job. I met families struggling to get by, forgotten by the America which should be fighting for them. I met the parents of Nataline Sarkisiyan, who died because corporate beancounters wouldn't pay for her liver transplant. Who will stand and fight for those who cannot fight themselves?

I'm sticking with John because I feel that even if he doesn't pull off the nomination, someone needs to remind the Democratic Party of what it once stood for. Now is not the time for unity or post-partisanship, now is the time for another progressive revolution, just like the one that brought us the New Deal. I'm sticking with John because I am not going to let 98% of the country be left without the choices that 2% had.  I have not been convinced that Hillary Clinton has been set free of the corporate culture that has strangled us in Washington, or that either of them has the plan that John Edwards has to restore to the Democratic Party and to America a commitment to social and economic justice. I find Barack Obama's message of fuzzy sunshine unsettlingly vague. Hope for what? Unity for what? It is my hope that 2008 will be like 1932, a realigning year that swept the forces of corporate corruption out in favor of the New Deal which sowed the seeds for the middle-class America we cherish so much. I am not interested in the mushy center--the time is ripe for a realignment, and I see JRE as the leader who best channels the progressive realignments of the past.

Read the plan for One America. No other candidate has so thoroughly worked out a commitment to restore the progressive ideals that built this country. Give JRE a chance to have his voice heard.

We don't just need a Democrat. We need a true progressive, someone who will carry the torch of the New Deal, of the Progressive Era, a commitment to ending injustice in America and around the world. Our forefathers dreamed of an America where everyone was heard and everyone had a chance, a dream for One America. It is my hope that with John Edwards staying in the race that the dream will never die.

crosspost


Comments



Thanks Kenton (VA Breeze - 1/10/2008 1:31:24 PM)
Just put my Edwards sticker on my car-Go Edwards!


Great Post (WillieStark - 1/10/2008 1:35:07 PM)
It is good to see someone with the guts to stick with the best candidate even after NH.

Good man Kenton. Keep the faith.



Thanks Lowell for Front Paging this Diary (oldsoldier - 1/10/2008 1:41:09 PM)
Very well written and expresses my fear about Obama eloquently.


Kenton - post on John Edwards Blog (totallynext - 1/10/2008 1:57:41 PM)
and daily kos.

I am going to SC to canvass.  It is time to keep fighting.



Edwards all the way (MikeSizemore - 1/10/2008 2:08:20 PM)
By far the best candidate when it actually comes to substance and issues! Good stuff, Kenton!


As an Obama supporter... (Doug in Mount Vernon - 1/10/2008 2:26:05 PM)
....and a 2004 Edwards delegate in Boston from Virginia's 10th District, I hear you.  I certainly agree with the ethic of your argument.

I would like to say, however, that if you listen to Barack Obama and look past just the primetime speeches, there is substance there as well.  Becuase he has a tendency to orate like a preacher, there is a pitfall in listening to him that could miss the important moral righteousness, strength of conviction, and sound judgment that is guiding his movement.  Don't make the mistake that Obama's passion precludes substance, determination, or certitude.

One key point I think you made well....."JRE as the leader who best channels the progressive realignments of the past".  I couldn't agree with you more.  However, is it not possible that Obama is the leader who best channels the progressive realignments of the future?  Time will tell.

They are both excellent men and candidates, and we would be well served by an Obama-Edwards or Edwards-Obama ticket.



siphoning barak's votes (presidentialman - 1/10/2008 4:05:20 PM)
I'm for John Edwards because he's a practicising lawyer-or was, and has a Senate record, and was the 2004 Democratic VP nominee, but after seeing NH, I recognize that NH doesn't want to blindly follow Iowa and that's why Clinton won, but I also think Clinton won because Edwards placed a distant third at 17%, making Obama's close second at 36% rather than the double digit victory predicted. And after Edwards made the we're going all the way speech, I think its helpful noting he's a guerilla candidate. His main strategy was be first in Iowa, while Obama and Clinton were setting up national campaign strategy's.  He placed second in one, third in another, I think he should call it quits and strike a deal for VP nominee or cabinet secretary because he's not Clinton or LBJ or Carter who can carry his region-the South(see 2004) or any other state.


Seen this argument ALOT on Dailykos (VA Breeze - 1/10/2008 5:31:06 PM)
and one of the best replies is why let only 2% of the voters pick our president-can't the rest of us have great choices?


Edwards should run through Super Tuesday (True Blue - 1/10/2008 5:48:13 PM)
I think it's perfectly reasonable for him to run through Super Tuesday.  If he is still polling less than half of the second place finisher (as he did in New Hampshire), he may want to reconsider.

Then again, he may have to stay in so as to be able to broker a convention and through his votes to ensure the nomination for one or the other of Obama or Clinton.

Either way, Edwards is a good man and I'm not surprised he attracts good supporters like Kenton.



Right On Kenton!! (thegools - 1/10/2008 6:00:54 PM)
Or should I say? Here Here!


"Reallignment." (thegools - 1/10/2008 6:20:06 PM)
Edwards scares the bejesus out of big business and the "corporate culture."   That is why he received so little attention &consideration in the press before IOWA, and it is the reason he was ignored after a surprise second place finish in Iowa.  
  In recent (pre-Iowa) polling, no democrat matched up better than Edwards against the GOP contenders, and still he was ignored.  Is it any surprise when we consider who owns the big media?

  I will not let the media dictate my candidates, and myu support will continue to be for the best candidate out there- JRE!  



I am glad Florida moved their primary up (relawson - 1/10/2008 7:00:51 PM)
I'm so sick of a handful of states - with just a handful of people - having so much influence.  And then like lemmings party activists say "Gee, Iowa and NH voted for these two so that's who I should vote for".  

The simple solution is to make the primaries a national election that occur on the same day.

So as a Florida resident, I get just a bit more say than you in Virginia.  It's not like the delagates matter - it's a popularity contest.  Ideas don't matter, just whoever is popular at the time.  Is it fair to you in Virginia?  No.  I hope it pisses you guys off enough to demand change.  Our primary system sucks.

I'll be voting for Edwards.  Hopefully somebody will get off of their ass in both parties and work out a solution to this silly problem.