John Kerry Endorses Obama [UPDATE: Ned Lamont Too]

By: code
Published On: 1/10/2008 10:45:34 AM




Big news this morning from the AP Wire
Kerry to Back Obama for President

MYRTLE BEACH, S.C. (AP) -- The Democrats' 2004 presidential nominee, John Kerry, is endorsing Barack Obama, a person close to Kerry says.

I'll refrain from value judgments or speculation as to whether this helps or hurts Obama. For now, just take it as news.

MSNBC says that Kerry will announce his endorsement at a rally at College of Charleston today.

UPDATE by Rob: Obama is bouncing back well post-NH with endorsements.  In addition to Senator Kerry, Obama was endorsed by Senator Johnson (S.D.), the Mayor of Atlanta, and the most important unions in Nevada this week.

UPDATE by Lowell:  See Lamont video on the "flip."

UPDATE by teacherken also endorsed by George Miller, who is top Lt. to Speaker Pelosi, and would not do it without at least her tacit approval


Comments



My gut is that it won't matter much... (ericy - 1/10/2008 10:48:03 AM)

There are probably not many contrarians who would change their vote away from Obama just because Kerry endorsed him, but I don't think Kerry carries that much weight any more either.


Not many individual endorsements really matter (Jack Landers - 1/10/2008 11:03:23 AM)
Maybe if Al Gore endorsed someone, that would really mean something. Short of that I don't think endorsements generally carry much weight.  


Maybe if Al Gore endorsed someone, that would really mean something. (JSG - 1/10/2008 11:26:09 AM)
How much did it mean for Governor Dean?


Look what Al Gore has accomplished (Chris Guy - 1/10/2008 12:49:03 PM)
in the last 4 years.  


Agreed (Silence Dogood - 1/10/2008 12:37:14 PM)
Gore's much more popular with rank and file Democrats today than he has been in the past eight years.  Wake me up when the Goracle has something to say.  Until then, snooze....


I think it could help (legacyofmarshall - 1/10/2008 11:10:35 AM)
At least in Massachusetts, a large (in terms of Dem Delegates) super Tuesday state.  Also (at the risk of being overly optimistic), I think this might bring in a small wave of important endorsements for Obama, who for now has lacked the sort of "institution" support that Clinton so obviously appeals to.

Finally - It must have taken some real guts on Kerry's part to make this endorsement.  When the race is perceived as being between two Senators, most of their peers have been reluctant to endorse (Obama thus far only has Durbin, Tim Johnson, and Conrad, Clinton has Schumer, Inouye, and Mikulski, Edwards has none).  40 of 49 Democratic Senators are currently not endorsing anyone, and I think the reason is obvious.  In the end they'll all support the nominee (I hope...), and given the heat of the race now, endorsing Obama or Clinton is a guarantee that you'll be on at least slightly sour terms with either the next President or a fellow Senator for years to come.



Behind the scenes may be more important (True Blue - 1/10/2008 11:12:58 AM)
The publicity is nice, and maybe a handful of undecided voters will be convinced, but really it's just the tip of the iceberg.

Kerry has lots of fundraiser lists, GOTV materials, and his own network from 2004 to share with Obama.  This kind of information could provide Obama with a small edge as he heads into some key states.



This hurts John Edwards (Terry - 1/10/2008 11:40:25 AM)
I agree that John Kerry's endorsement is unlikely to mean that much to primary voters. But it's very valuable for these reasons: 1. As mentioned, JK has lists of millions of donors, volunteers that he has maintained contact with since 2004. (I am one of them. 2. It begs the question "Why not John Edwards?" I like JE so this is hard for me to admit but I do think it hurts Edwards that this time Kerry is going with Obama. 3. It opens the door for other senators to endorse. 4. JK is still very popular in the Dem party and will bring along some more "inside the party" supporters that may have been holding back because they do not want to offend the Clintons. 5.  


Edwards statement (Lowell - 1/10/2008 12:54:47 PM)
Our country and our Party are stronger because of John's service, and I respect his decision. When we were running against each other and on the same ticket, John and I agreed on many issues. I continue to believe that this election is about the future, not the past, and that the country needs a President who will fight aggressively to end the status quo and change the Washington system and to give voice to all of those whose voices are ignored in the corridors of power.


Classy move by Edwards (Chris Guy - 1/10/2008 12:56:35 PM)
a stark contrast to Lieberman going on all the morning talk shows 4 years ago and whining about how his former runningmate endorsed someone else.


Lieberman is a dork. (thegools - 1/10/2008 6:24:32 PM)


You're too kind in your description of Lieberman.... (Dianne - 1/11/2008 8:39:14 AM)


An important signal at a critical time (The Grey Havens - 1/10/2008 11:47:56 AM)
This is an endorsement for the long war.

Even though Obama defied expectations and came within 2 points of HRC in NH, her win ensures that this will be a drawn out battle, lasting through super tuesday. With Edwards still in the race, it could be a divided convention if he picks up some delegates.  So, rather than a blowout we have a horse-race.

This endorsement is important, because it shows that Obama has as much institutional support as Hillary, and will have the support he needs to fight through to November.



Kerry's endorsement of Webb was (Lowell - 1/10/2008 11:54:10 AM)
crucial.  Just sayin'.


Outside Virginia (Silence Dogood - 1/10/2008 12:33:47 PM)
It surely helped Webb's fundraising and street cred outside the Commonwealth, but be serious, how much did that matter to Webb with the people who actually cast votes?


I thought I was being serious (Lowell - 1/10/2008 12:52:01 PM)
:)


Oh! (Silence Dogood - 1/10/2008 1:30:41 PM)
Sorry, I just don't rank Kerry's influence that highly, especially compared to some of the other endorsements Webb picked up from Democrats who have consistently won elections in Virginia (Tim Kaine, Mark Warner, Doug Wilder, Donald McEachin, etc.) and I'm not going to award anyone except Warner and Kaine "crucial" status based on a race where we didn't break 50%.

Heck, I think the Ronald Reagan was probably more influential in 2006, considering who Jim Webb chose to highlight in his ads.



the endorsement of Webb by Kerry in context (presidentialman - 1/10/2008 4:19:46 PM)
When Kerry endorsed Webb, he was still stood up against Bush and almost won Kerry, in english, that means pre "botched joke".  We are living in post-botched joke Kerry world, in which the Democrats saved landslide wins and Kerry's 2008 presidential bid went bust when it was launched.  Though for institutional reason I can see how kerry's endorsement of Obama is akin to Webb being endorsed by Kerry.


It cannot help... (Bwana - 1/10/2008 11:49:22 AM)
...John Edwards that the guy he ran with in 2004 is endorsing his opponent in 2008, and in a make or break primary in Edward's back yard.


Agree ... (Rob - 1/10/2008 12:01:03 PM)
... would expect some soft Edwards supporters to shift away from him now.


I don't know-the kind of "in your face" (VA Breeze - 1/11/2008 12:12:57 AM)
thing could backfire-comes across as sort of -bad manners  


Democrat VP = Political Murder by Running Mate (oldsoldier - 1/10/2008 11:57:52 AM)
I could understand why Gore didn't endorse Lubberman but don't understand why he endorsed anyone else.  The right thing to do would be to stay out of endorsing anyone but the guy/gal with whom you lost your presidential shot.

Same holds for Kerry.  You don't see Dubya endorsing anyone yet, and that has to make McCain rue the "you are the man" hug with Dubya.

I hope Gore will endorse Edwards as the guy who not only thinks he can do economic justice and get on with tough laws on global warming, but has the track record to actually do it.  I don't see Obama or Hillary getting tough with polluters or corporate greed except in a nominal, I tried, but Congress (which is in special interest pockets)wouldn't let me do it my way.

I'm getting really super discouraged that our annointed super delegates and party leaders are afraid to back a leader for fear of backing a loser if the polls are right.

I hope Jim Webb considers this if he is asked to join anyone's ticket as VP.



Gary Hart endorses Obama (Bernie Quigley - 1/10/2008 12:25:43 PM)
Likewise, Gary Hart, one of the best foreign-policy minds of he Democrats  has also endorsed Obama.
http://www.denverpost.com/head...


Kerry letter (Lowell - 1/10/2008 1:51:15 PM)
Martin Luther King said, "The time is always right to do what is right." So I'm choosing this time to share an important decision I've made, one I believe is right for this country.

The JohnKerry.com community has been very important to me and very important to the Democratic resurgence over the last couple of years, so I wanted to let all of you know my decision before I confirm it with anyone else. I want to share with you my conviction that in a field of fine Democratic candidates, the next President of the United States can be, should be, and will be Barack Obama. Each of our candidates would make a fine President, and we are blessed with a strong field. But for this moment, at this time in our nation's history, Barack Obama is the right choice.

Please join me in supporting Barack Obama's candidacy.

I'm proud to have helped introduce Barack to our nation when I asked him to speak to our national convention, and there Barack's words and vision burst out. On that day he reminded Americans that our "true genius is faith in simple dreams, an insistence on small miracles." And with his leadership we can build simple dreams, and we can turn millions of small miracles into real change for our country.

At this particular moment, with our country faced with great challenges in our economy, in our environment, and in our foreign policy, and with our politics torn by division, Barack Obama can bring transformation to our country. With Barack, we can build a new majority of Americans from all regions who can turn the page on the politics of Karl Rove and begin a new politics, one worthy of our nation's history and promise. We can bring millions of disaffected people - young and old - to the great task of governing and making a difference, child to child, community to community.

Please click here to give what you can to Barack Obama's campaign for President and help build this future for our country.

The moment is now, and the candidate for this moment is Barack Obama. Like him, I also lived abroad as a young man, and I share with him a healthy respect for the advantage of knowing other cultures and countries, not from a book or a briefing, but by personal experience, by gut, by instinct. He knows the issues from the deep study of a legislator, and he knows them from a life lived outside of Washington. His is the wisdom of real-world experience combined with the intellect of a man who has thought deeply about the challenges we face.

History has given us this moment. But we need to decide what to do with it. I believe, with this moment, we should make Barack Obama President of the United States.

Please join me in supporting his campaign.

Thank you,
John Kerry



Just Recieved (Gordie - 1/10/2008 2:15:31 PM)
email from Kerry about his endorsement and asking for contributions.

Here is something that really got me thinking.

"The moment is now, and the candidate for this moment is Barack Obama. Like him, I also lived abroad as a young man, and I share with him a healthy respect for the advantage of knowing other cultures and countries, not from a book or a briefing, but by personal experience, by gut, by instinct."

Lived abroad as a young man?

As most people know, a persons youth shapes thinking more then most anything one encounters in life. So just what kind of thinking and direction will the country get from one who lived their youth out of this country.

Is this one of the reasons our founders said one had to be  born in American? Did they understand something we fail to envision?

Sure he is an American citizen. And I am not saying he is Muslim or anything else. I am just questioning living so long out of this country in his youth.

I only question, is it a blessing for his knowledge of another culture or will the youth lessons change America into something our descendants will hate us for?

I am just raising a question and make no judgement of any kind. Is what a raise an issue that the other party will use against the candidate?



NOT AFTER BUSH -CHENEY-RUMSFELD (Lee Diamond - 1/10/2008 7:29:54 PM)
NOT AFTER THE 9/11 FEARMONGERS.

What is so bad about a Hopemonger?



Oh good God (Silence Dogood - 1/10/2008 10:55:24 PM)
Be wary when people start spouting talking points at you that don't answer the question you asked.  For the record, you don't have to have lived abroad to be genuinely optimistic or hopefull.

To actually answer the question: someone once said that a nation isn't made out of boundaries or lines drawn on a map, and that it's not defined by a common language or common genetic traits or a common language or flag.  A nation's identity is created by the people who self-identify as belong to and being a part of that nation.  So I don't really care where Barack Obama spent his childhood years, and I don't think it could warp his perspective or make him any less of an American anyone else.  As long as he loves this country--as all our fine candidates do--then that should be good enough for any of us, shouldn't it?  It's certainly good enough for me.

It was kind of a strange thing for Kerry to point out, though, I thought.  Like, hey, I studied abroad for a semester when I was an undergrad, too!...



jesus christ (Sui Juris - 1/10/2008 11:01:17 PM)

I am just raising a question and make no judgement of any kind.

Were you dropped on your head as a child?  I'm not making any judgments, of course.  Just askin'.


Sure he is an American citizen. And I am not saying he is Muslim or anything else.

Right, because if you were, that would mean . . . what?


Karl Rove uses racial code language (Lowell - 1/10/2008 4:21:34 PM)
See here for more.


Endorsements.... (sndeak - 1/10/2008 6:18:20 PM)
Do endorsements mean anything? Some yes, some no. Some may help in certain parts of the country and hurt in others. It also depends on what the candidate gets in return. The unions provide boots on the ground as well as money. Previous elected officials or candidates can bring email and donor lists as well as connections and influence.


Fair weather endorsements (relawson - 1/10/2008 6:25:25 PM)
Why didn't he do the endorsement prior to Iowa?  I think it is silly for these guys to endorse people now - clearly it is for their own political points.

If Hillary was ahead - ie also won Iowa - I'll bet he would be endorsing her right now.  Two races down, and these "elitists" are already trying to decide the election.  

I wish all the pollsters, pundits, and politicians would shut their pie holes during this process.  It's one thing if your are supporting a candidate all the way - but quite another when you wait to see which way the political winds are blowing.



Uh...No (sndeak - 1/10/2008 6:28:43 PM)
I agree the timing is wierd. I don't think Kerry would have endorsed Clinton. There is some bad blood there from 04.


Myth (Silence Dogood - 1/10/2008 10:56:38 PM)
n/t


Fact n/t (sndeak - 1/10/2008 11:46:04 PM)


The Speeches And Endorsements Add Up (Lee Diamond - 1/10/2008 7:36:01 PM)
Kerry's speech was eloquent because Barack Obama is an unusually gifted public servant.  There is a lot one can say about Barack Obama, but it helps when it is said by people who are well known.

I think he has a lot less to hide than most public servants.  What do they have on Barack?  That he lived in a foreign country?  True.

That he's a Christian convert from Islam?  False.  That he is unpatriotic?  False.

So, what do they have on Barack Obama?



They are gonna try to use Rezko. (sndeak - 1/10/2008 8:52:14 PM)
You watch. The howlers at MyDD have already started.


Ned Lamont (Lowell - 1/10/2008 9:46:28 PM)
endorses Barack Obama:

At the end of the day, it just seems to me that Barack Obama is the guy who can energize new voters, build coalitions and be in the position to get real change.



Also, Lamont's got a (Lowell - 1/10/2008 9:49:07 PM)
diary on Daily Kos explaining his Obama endorsement:

Today, with our Presidential primary in Connecticut less than a month away, I am announcing my support of Barack Obama for President because I am convinced that his forward-looking, progressive vision provides the best chance to enact meaningful reforms in the way Washington works.

Sen. Obama has the tone and temperament to bring out the best in our people and our nation, and to bring new coalitions together in support of the progressive policies we all want to see enacted. His campaign has already reflected this, not only by bringing hundreds of thousands of new voters of all ages to the polls, but by inspiring so many who are new to politics to become activists as well.



Good netroots endorsement (DanG - 1/10/2008 10:05:31 PM)
But I get the feeling Obama was probably the leading netroots candidate at this point anyways.


No, Edwards was/is by far. (Lowell - 1/10/2008 10:10:21 PM)
By the way, Hillary just got a big endorsement -- if you like vampires, that is! :)



Ugh (DanG - 1/10/2008 10:13:07 PM)
I hated Interview with the Vampire.  Couldn't even finish it.  

No offense to Ms. Rice, but I hardly think it compares with Kerry or Lamont :)



I just think it's funny (Lowell - 1/10/2008 10:16:09 PM)
My favorite comment so far from Marc Ambinder's blog:

Boy, this is going to cause some big-time confusion for the country-club Republican set. Their favorite hardcore sadomasochistic fantasy novel author endorses their most hated enemy.

ROFLMAO!



Why We Love Lowell (Lee Diamond - 1/10/2008 10:27:35 PM)
Good one Lowell.


Comfort zone (Rebecca - 1/10/2008 10:39:13 PM)
I would feel a lot more comfortable about the election if there were not so many voting machine company executives who turn out to be convicted felons. Turns out there is another felon-executive running the voting machine company in New Hampshire. It seems that a lot of these companies are good places to find a job if you are just getting out of prison.


Kerry's Endorsement (soccerdem - 1/13/2008 2:24:49 PM)
Just as Kerry waited too long to respond to the Swift Boat attackers, so too he has given his blessing to Obama too late for credibility.  Had he endorsed before the Iowa caucuses, I might have thought something of it, but it looks as if Kerry was just going with a [then] certain winner.  Secy of Defense, anyone?

As for oldsoldier's remark that it's proper that Dubya hasn't endorsed anyone yet, do you really think that if Bush knew who was running he wouldn't endorse one of the Republican field? C'mon.