On The Importance Of Losing

By: Evan M
Published On: 11/8/2007 4:47:16 PM

Losing matters.
(With a tip-o-the-hat to snolan.)

Mark Warner lost in 1996.

The Red Sox lost in 2003.

James Madison lost in 1777.

In each case, the loss led to adjustments and lessons which brought long-term  success for the future. The losses sustained by Karen Schultz, Marty Martinez and Bruce Roemmelt should not be seen as defeats, but as lessons which our Party can take into the future. We need to retain contact with the voters that Karen, Marty and Bruce connected with during the campaign, the combination of which yield a strong starting plurality for races in 2008 and 2009. We need to activate these voters in their local precincts in advance of Novembers to come, and keep Karen, Marty and Bruce in the loop so that voters are reminded of the alternative they had when the Republican Assembly stonewalls Virginia's progress for the next two years.
In every defeat lies and opportunity for learning and changing. Perhaps we need to do a better job or organizing west of Route 15. Perhaps we need to hold some community meetings with independent voters to understand whether we are dealing with people who have a skewed idea of what it means to be a Democrat, or simply people who did not know who Karen, Bruce and Marty were. If nothing else, we need to make sure it is okay to be a Democrat west of Rt. 15 (Sally Kurtz probably knows a thing or two about doing that), since there is always safety in numbers, and with opponents like Bob Marshall and Karen Vogel, we can expect our voters to be ridiculed simply for voting Democratic.

It is in victory that people start taking the voters for granted; that's what happened in Loudoun County. The Board majority forgot that it's not money, or developers, or closed meetings, or titles that matter. It's the voters on election day who matter. The races we lost this year should serve us as inspiration to remember the voters, remember what they care about, and do our best for a better Virginia.

Brian Moran gets the last word: We aren't here just to win elections. We win elections in order to give Virginia the government it deserves.

(Crossposted from Leesburg Tomorrow)


Comments



Jill Vogel (elevandoski - 11/9/2007 8:59:32 AM)
oops...


Stings (Evan M - 11/9/2007 10:34:48 AM)
Yeah, losing that race stings, but there are two points out of that race I would raise.

1. Thank God we WON the senate. Her pernicious influence in the minority will be greatly reduced as a result.

2. Karen Schultz showed the DPVA what needs doing in the next two years. Our candidate won Loudoun and Clarke counties, as well as the city of Winchester, but it wasn't enough to make up the margin in Frederick and Fauquier Counties. In order to flip this district we do not need to win in Frederick and Fauquier next time (though that should be our goal) we simply need to reduce the other side's margins there. Improving our organization and outreach in Fauquier and Frederick should be pretty straightforward, given the continued southwestern migration of suburbia.



These results also bode very well for (Lowell - 11/9/2007 10:39:23 AM)
Judy Feder, btw.  Those counties are getting bluer by the day, and Karen Schultz BARELY lost to Jill Holtzman Vogel.  Should be interesting in a presidential election year...


....with Paul/Tancredo (Lowell - 11/9/2007 10:40:36 AM)
as a right-wing third party possibility.


I was pointing out your typo... (elevandoski - 11/9/2007 1:26:53 PM)
you have "Karen Schultz" listed. 


Indeed (Evan M - 11/9/2007 2:30:25 PM)
I did list Karen, she won Loudoun and Clarke, but lost Fauquier and Frederick, which made the difference.

I did some deeper analysis of the results of this race today.



Certainly you want to organize everywhere (dingojoe - 11/10/2007 12:53:24 AM)
You also want to keep in mind that Karen Schultz district and the other district  in Loudon, Mark Herring's, will be changed substantially by redistricting.  They rank 1-2 in numbers of registered voters among Senate districts, and while there are socioeconomic factors that prevent registration=population, there's little doubt that these are the two fastest growing Senate districts. 

Schultz could tell the Dems a thing or two about organizing in Frederick/Winchester as she ran well ahead of any recent Democrats numbers (Kaine, Webb, Warner)

If redistricting made Fauquier disappear from the equation, she'll be looking good for a rematch.