Well what a difference a four months makes. Asked by a voter today in New Hampshire, Hil said, not once, but twice, that she would also negotiate with Iran with no conditions.
And now I am confused - would she, or wouldn't she? I don't think she really knows. Certainly with all the EXPERIENCE she keeps pitching, she should be able to have made her mind up on this issue. Or maybe she got some advice from John Kerry on this issue, Mr. "I voted for the 87 billion after I voted against it" who had a propensity to contradict himself, and, as a result, went down in flames in 2004.
But is just goes to show you - good judgment trumps experience. And Obama beats her hands down in the good judgment department.
I suggest you go back to the debate transcript and look at what Hillary said, and tell me where that is any different than what she said yesterday...it isn't. The entire thing is based on a lazily written AP story, jumped on by the pavlovian handlers of Obama and Edwards...a story that has since been rewritten to something closer to the truth. In fact, Hillary said before, during an after the debate that she was for diplomatic negotiations with Iran. She took issue with Obama, correctly, that such negotiations would be done immediately at the Presidential level, which is the question they were asked in that debate, and which Obama answered in the affirmative...
Obama was mistaken then, and he is "mistaken" now...