Iraq YES; Children NO

By: Dianne
Published On: 10/4/2007 7:44:52 AM

While Bush is denying American children who have NO health insurance (by vetoing S-CHIP legislation), the Bush Administration is putting it's final touches on the largest American embassy in the world -- the Iraq embassy -- 21 buildings on 104 acres (approximately the size of 80 football fields).

Here's a description from USA Today:

21 STRUCTURES 

-- New office building: Includes classified activities
-- New office annex: For public diplomacy staff, consular affairs and the U.S. Agency for International Development
-- Interim office building: Designed for future use as a school
-- General services annex: Facilities management, break areas, staff locker rooms
-- Recreation building: Gym, exercise room, swimming pool, locker rooms, the American Club, commissary, food court, barber and beauty shop
-- Six staff apartment buildings: Each has one bedroom apartments
-- Residences for the chief and deputy chief of mission
-- Marine security guard quarters
-- Remaining buildings are dedicated to security, vehicle maintenance and facilities management, storage, utilities, and water and wastewater treatment

Sources: State Department, Mall of America, Disneyland, Architect of the Capitol, wire reports and Senate Foreign Relations Committee

And the Guardian reports that " - the embassy is one of the few major projects the administration has undertaken in Iraq that is on schedule and within budget."  And what are the costs of the enormous, permanent militry bases that have been built (by Kuwaitis not Iraqis) in Iraq?

Mr. President, shame on you for chiseling deserving children out of an opportunity for healthcare!  And to the House Republicans who stick with Bush on this issue, well, good luck next year in November....

 


Comments



what did u expect?? (lgb30856 - 10/4/2007 11:32:17 AM)
they are heartless, but u knew that.


It's worse than "heartless" (Lowell - 10/4/2007 11:38:15 AM)
There's no profit for them in healthy children.  War in Iraq, on the other hand, is a huge boondoggle for their buddies.  War profiteering over healthy American children?  A no-brainer for us, and a no-brainer for them too, just in the opposite direction.


When are Congressional Democrats... (tx2vadem - 10/5/2007 11:33:18 PM)
...going to end this occupation?  They have the power.  They don't need the president.  They can end this through refusing to fund it.  They can appropriate enough money to allow for a phased withdrawal.  And in one fell swoop, they can restore some fiscal responsibility to Washington and do something that the majority of people want.

The time for this occupation to end has come and gone.  The time for foot dragging is over.  As fantastic as our military is and as bright as members of it are, there is no military solution for Iraq.  The future of Iraq is in the hands of Iraqis.  It is time for them to master their own destiny and for us to leave them be.

More money for this failed policy?  We need to get every Virginian in every congressional district in this sate to flood the offices of their representatives with letters and phone calls everyday until even the most harden heart must listen.  $190 billion is ridiculous, just ridiculous.  No more, no more.  Stop saddling our children with the Iraq Occupation debt!



Are Republicans Even Capable of Governing a Country? (Dianne - 10/7/2007 8:11:35 AM)
I must recant what I said in this diary.  I wrote about the gargantuan Baghdad Embassy's progress and cost as being "on time and within budget", as had been reported in the media.  But even as I wrote the story, I felt that this was an unusual accomplishment for the Government, especially considering that it was a construction project in the heart of a frightening and barbarous location, Baghdad.

Well, the ever-faithful secretive Bush Administration has just done their usual 180 and now are informing us taxpayers that the Baghdad Fort -- oops Embassy -- "... could cost $144 million more than projected and will open months behind schedule because of poor planning, shoddy workmanship, internal disputes and last-minute changes sought by State Department officials...", as reported in today's WaPo!

The Baghdad Embassy was to have been finished by September 2007 and would have cost us $592 million. But --

The growing price tag and delayed opening have alarmed members of Congress, some of whom regard the troubled project as the latest in a series of State Department management problems in Iraq. The department has been criticized for failing to send enough reconstruction specialists to assist U.S. forces in Baghdad and for not providing adequate oversight of its principal private security force, Blackwater USA, whose personnel have been accused of using excessive force to protect U.S. diplomats.

Bush's lack of personal business acumen always resulted in endless bailouts by others.  So here we are again in a royal Bush screw up costing us more money and lost time.  I contend that this Administration and, by their complicity, Republicans are incapable of running the Government of the United States of America!!! They are 2 for 2 ... so far:  the US and Iraq.



Republicans Can't Govern (Dianne - 10/7/2007 9:00:13 AM)
Just found another example in today's NY Times of how the Bush Administration and Republicans are "giving it to the American public" and this time it's no less than to the elderly. 

Tens of thousands of Medicare recipients have been victims of deceptive sales tactics and had claims improperly denied by private insurers that run the system's huge new drug benefit program and offer other private insurance options encouraged by the Bush administration, a review of scores of federal audits has found.
...
The audits document widespread violations of patients' rights and consumer protection standards. Some violations could directly affect the health of patients - for example, by delaying access to urgently needed medications.
...
For years, Democrats have complained about efforts to "privatize Medicare," and they are likely to cite the findings as evidence that private insurers cannot be trusted to care for the sickest, most vulnerable Medicare recipients.

I have elderly parents who are in the Part D program and I can tell you it's a privatized bureaucratic nether world to deal with! 

From the insurers denying the elderly necessary medications to even trying to figure out which plan is best for your medical circumstance, Bush and the Republicans are lining the pockets of the pharmaceutical and insurance companies and sticking it to the American elderly! 

Why should we be surprised:  the pharmaceutical and insurance industries wrote the legislation and then gave jobs to the legislators that pushed it through.