With news of his fundraising prowess ($5.1 million) during the third quarter, there's been a mini-boomlet for libertarian Ron Paul recently. I could spend hours getting into Paul's craziness, but let's just look at one of his most recent votes, AGAINST a resolution "Expressing the Sense of Congress Regarding the Immediate and Unconditional Release of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi." For those of you who aren't familiar with Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, she is the courageous Burmese woman awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1991 for her non-violent struggle against her country's brutal military dictatorship. The vote in Congress to demand her immediate and unconditional release by Burma's
P.S. Actually, there's another recent vote by Paul that's too good...er, bad to pass up. This time, Paul was one of 12 representatives voting "nay" on a bill "To Provide Compensation to Relatives of United States Citizens Who Were Killed As a Result of the Bombings of United States Embassies in East Africa on August 7, 1998." I would point out that one of the other 11 voting against this bill (which passed 409-12) was Virginia's own Eric Cantor. That says it all right there.
And it just goes to show, that no matter what side one is on, it's risky to be a one-issue voter.
Source: TPM Cafe
See here for more.
Why the focus on Ron Paul? Is he a threat? And so he voted against a resolution, which is nothing other than fluff, what's the big deal? For example: "Resolved by the House of Representatives, That Congress firmly supports motherhood and apple pie." Or perhaps everyone's favorite:
Resolved, That the House of Representatives--(1) recognizes the service of General David H. Petraeus, as well as all other members of the Armed Forces serving in good standing, in the defense of the United States and the personal sacrifices made by General Petraeus and his family, and other members of the Armed Forces and their families, to serve with distinction and honor;
(2) commits to judge the merits of the sworn testimony of General David H. Petraeus without prejudice or personal bias, including refraining from unwarranted personal attacks;
(3) condemns in the strongest possible terms the personal attacks made by the advocacy group MoveOn.org impugning the integrity and professionalism of General David H. Petraeus;
(4) honors all members of the Armed Forces and civilian personnel serving in harm's way, as well as their families; and
(5) pledges to move forward on all policy debate regarding the war in Iraq with the solemn respect and the commitment to intellectual integrity that the sacrifices of these members of the Armed Forces and civilian personnel deserve.