Conference Call with Mark Warner

By: Lowell
Published On: 9/13/2007 12:44:24 PM

Ben and I just got off an exclusive (e.g., just "His Excellency," Ben and me) 25-minute phone with Mark Warner.  Overall, I'd say Warner sounds great and is "tanned, rested and ready" to go.  Here are some highlights of what he had to say:

*He had two great options, run for Governor or Senate. He took a lot of time weighing his options.  It was a tough choice, but he's comfortable and "at peace" with the decision he made.

*What drove his decision to run for Senate was "policy issues."  The more he talked to people, he kept hearing "it's worse than you think" on fiscal policy, energy policy, foreign policy...not to mention the Iraq fiasco.

*If we accept the notion that the "business as usual" scenario is all we can aspire to, "that's pretty bleak."  In contrast, Warner says he's "always been a risk taker" and wants to work for "transformstive change" in this country.

*As Senator, Warner's going to bring an "independent voice" and possibly make "both parties equally mad."

*If there's one lesson from the Bush administration, it's that even if you control "all the marbles," if you can't get consensus, you still won't get transformative change.

*On Bill Howell's comments the other day about immigrants not sharing "Virginia's values," Warner says "I do not accept [them]."  The fact is that NOVA is the economic engine driving the state, and many of the people doing that driving have been "new Americans."

*Warner said that, of course, we have to acknowledge the frustration of communities dealing with change.  We need to secure our borders and enforce our current immigration laws.  We need to strengthen enforcement against employers who are breaking the immigration law.  Overall, we need a "more thoughtful approach" and "less heated discussion" on this issue.

*In the Senate, Warner would hope to focus on the military, clean energy technology, underlying financial issues (he says he has some expertise in that area).

*He looks forward to talking about how his administration turned Virginia's fiscal situation around and keep it the best place in the nation to do business.  He is not afraid to talk about his tax reform, in which he "lowered some taxes and raised others."

*Overall, he's "looking forward to the campaign."  He's also looking forward to helping out over the next 50+ days to  get Tim Kaine the allies he needs in the General Assembly.

In conclusion, thanks to Governor Warner for speaking with us today, and I'd just like to say:

Go Mark Warner!


Comments



MARK WARNER IS GOOD (The Grey Havens - 9/13/2007 12:49:48 PM)
Pass it on.


"...And possibly 'make both parties equally mad.'" (Silence Dogood - 9/13/2007 12:56:19 PM)
Yeah, sounds like the perfect replacement for John Warner to me! :-) I love his message of America's choice not being between Democrat or Republican, Left or Right, but the Future or the Past.


Right in line with Jim Webb (DanG - 9/13/2007 1:43:41 PM)
I'm really excited.  Virginia will have the most independent, honorable pair of Senators in the nation!  Woohoo!


Matt Stoller sure jumped the gun: (beachmom - 9/13/2007 2:55:25 PM)
http://www.openleft....

Warner's a centrist, not a partisan, and my guess is that this will turn a lot of people off who had previously 'loved' Mark Warner.  If the Republicans can find a candidate, I think he's going to have a bumpier ride than expected.  He'll still win, in all likelihood, but he's going to be a bad Senator.

But those were delicious chocolate fountains.

I semi-politely told him where he could stick his opinion, including an impassioned defense of Warner's record as governor which upholds liberal/progressive values.

Thanks for the roundup of the conversation, Lowell.



Did he mention anything about (Eric - 9/13/2007 1:32:26 PM)
the environment?  Obviously clean energy has significant environmental implications, but did he have anything to say specifically about addressing any of the environmental problems we currently face?


He talked about clean energy (Lowell - 9/13/2007 1:35:13 PM)
Obviously, energy and the environment are on his mind, and I hope to ask him more about both in the future.


Door still open? (Evan M - 9/13/2007 1:33:58 PM)
Maybe I'm the only one who noticed, but the announcement video said two interesting things to me. First, he made prominent mention of the November legislative elections here in Virginia (it's at about 1:22 in) and then, right after that, Gov. Warner said he'd hold off on his formal Senatorial announcement until AFTER the November elections.

In case you missed it (and I'm guessing it didn't come up on the call this morning) Gov. Warner has kept the door slightly ajar for him to run for Governor not Senator. As I see it, if the DPVA doesn't control at least the State Senate, Mark Warner might run for Governor again, just to be sure the Dems  have a piece of power to play during the 2011 redistricting.

At the end of he day, Mark is a Virginian, and I think he cares to make sure that the Democratic Party of Virginia is thriving before departing for DC. 



His Mind's made up (DukieDem - 9/13/2007 1:41:02 PM)
I think the value of re-districting vs. the value of having a say in the enormously important issues decided in running for the Senate is an easy one.

But of course if he really hates the Senate he can always run again in 2013, 2017, etc. because the election cycles don't match up.



O I Agree (Evan M - 9/13/2007 1:58:17 PM)
I agree he's running for Senate at a 95% probability, but I think the announcement speech was crafted and vetted enough that the door is SLIGHTLY ajar.


99.9999999999% (Lowell - 9/13/2007 2:06:05 PM)
Hell, just round it up and call it 100%. :)


No Rounding (Evan M - 9/13/2007 3:26:07 PM)
There is nothing more dangerous in Politics than a sure thing.

In September of 2005, we didn't have Webb and Ned Lamont was just a Mayor, George Allen was going to be our next President and Mark Foley was still the head of the Protect Our Children Caucus in Congress.

Look, I hope I'm wrong, I want to be wrong, I believe I'm wrong, but there's that nagging piece of my political brain that says "that sentence about November only makes sense if he might not run," after all, he's going to work for us to win in November anyway, we all know that, but by putting it in there, there's wiggle room if he has to get out.

Here's to my being wrong, but cautious!

;-)



Point of Fact (code - 9/13/2007 5:14:50 PM)
The website is called MarkWarner2008, not '2009.


meh (noonan - 9/13/2007 2:04:26 PM)
It was probably worded that way so that in November, he can have a big announcement and the press will come and cover him as being "officially" in the race.  Also the fact that he doesn't want to be officially campaigning for a federal race at the same time that he's running around campaigning in state races.


Nice Conference Call (Jeremiahthemessiah - 9/13/2007 2:12:00 PM)
Congratulations again on having the opportunity, it would have been a lot of fun to be a part of! 

Glad to hear he's going to work some magic for the legislative races.  Can't wait for the senate 2008 race to develope. 



Thanks. (Lowell - 9/13/2007 2:24:11 PM)
Your screen name is very interesting, by the way!


Haha. (Jeremiahthemessiah - 9/13/2007 3:25:51 PM)
I thought of it one day and I liked the rhyme.  I really don't think of myself that way, don't worry, haha. 


? (Adam Malle - 9/13/2007 7:34:20 PM)
I'm being impatient but when will the web sight be more than a sign-up sheet?


Describe for outsider (relawson - 9/13/2007 11:00:00 PM)
In comparison to Senator Webb (who I admire) how does Warner compare when it comes to policy positions?  Is Warner a populist like Webb?